中国儿童保健杂志 ›› 2024, Vol. 32 ›› Issue (7): 778-784.DOI: 10.11852/zgetbjzz2023-0880

• 荟萃分析 • 上一篇    下一篇

网络认知行为疗法对青少年抑郁症状疗效Meta分析

许婷1, 刘鹏鸿2, 李树峰3, 高胜利1, 刘丽霞1   

  1. 1.山西医科大学汾阳学院生理学教研室,山西 汾阳 032200;
    2.山西医科大学第一医院精神心理科;
    3.山西医科大学汾阳学院预防医学教研室
  • 收稿日期:2023-08-29 修回日期:2023-12-16 发布日期:2024-07-15 出版日期:2024-07-10
  • 作者简介:许婷(1989-),女,讲师,硕士研究生,主要研究方向为抑郁症、焦虑症的致病因素与防治。
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金资助项目(82201691);山西医科大学汾阳学院科技扶持基金(2022C18)

Meta-analysis of the efficacy of internet-based cognitive behavior therapy for adolescents with depressive symptoms

XU Ting1, LIU Penghong2, LI Shufeng3, GAO Shengli1, LIU Lixia1   

  1. 1. Department of Physiology, Fenyang College of Shanxi Medical University, Fenyang, Shanxi 032200, China;
    2. Department of Psychiatry, The First Hospital of Shanxi Medical University;
    3. Department of Preventive Medicine, Fenyang College of Shanxi Medical University
  • Received:2023-08-29 Revised:2023-12-16 Online:2024-07-10 Published:2024-07-15

摘要: 目的 系统评价网络认知行为疗法(iCBT)对青少年抑郁症状的疗效,以期为临床实践提供参考。方法 网络检索PubMed、Embase、Cochrane Library、Web of Science、中国知网、万方数据、维普网数据库中iCBT对青少年抑郁症状疗效的随机对照试验(RCT),检索时限为建库至2023年2月,2名研究者独立筛选符合纳入标准的RCTs并提取数据,评价偏倚风险后运用RevMan 5.4.1和R 4.3.0软件的Metafor程序包进行统计分析。结果 共纳入12个RCTs,2 469 例研究对象。Meta分析结果显示:对于干预后抑郁症状评分的组间比较,疗程≤8周,干预组比对照组降低得更多(SMD=-0.63, 95%CI:-0.93~-0.33),差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);疗程>8周,干预组和对照组的变化都不明显(SMD=-0.23, 95%CI:-0.49~0.04),差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);对于长期随访后抑郁症状评分的组间比较,干预组比对照组降低得更多(SMD=-0.28, 95%CI:-0.53~-0.02),差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);干预组长期随访前后的抑郁症状评分变化不明显(SMD=0.13, 95%CI:-0.03~0.29),差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论 iCBT可改善青少年的抑郁症状,且疗效可持续较长时间,建议在临床实践中推广使用。

关键词: 网络, 认知行为疗法, 青少年, 抑郁症状, Meta分析

Abstract: Objective To systematically evaluate the effect of internet-based cognitive behavior therapy(iCBT) for adolescents with depressive symptoms, so as to provide reference for clinical practice. Methods PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, CNKI, WanFang, VIP database were systematically searched to capture relevant randomized controlled trials(RCTs) from database inception to February 2023. Two reviewers independently screened the retrieved literature, then extracted the data and assessed the risk of bias of the eligible RCTs. Statistical analysis was performed by RevMan 5.4.1 and the Metafor package of R 4.3.0 software. Results Twelve RCTs involving 2 469 participants were included. For the intergroup comparison of depressive symptoms score of posttreatment, the intervention group decreased significantly more than the control group(SMD = -0.63, 95% CI:-0.93 - -0.33, P<0.05) when the treatment course ≤ 8 weeks, but the change of intervention group and control group was not significant(SMD=-0.23, 95% CI: -0.49 - 0.04, P>0.05) when the treatment course>8 weeks. For the intergroup comparison of depressive symptoms score of long-term follow-up, the intervention group decreased significantly more than the control group(SMD =-0.28, 95% CI: -0.53 - -0.02, P<0.05). In addition, there were no statistically significant difference when comparing the depressive symptoms scores of the intervention group before and after the long-term follow-up(SMD =0.13, 95% CI: -0.03 - 0.29, P>0.05). Conclusions iCBT can alleviate depressive symptoms in adolescents and the efficacy of iCBT on depressive symptoms can be sustained for a long time. It is recommended to promote iCBT in clinical practice.

Key words: internet, cognitive behavior therapy, adolescent, depressive symptoms, Meta-analysis

中图分类号: