Reliability and validity test of Chinese version of the Child Riding Risk Behavior Diagnostic Scale

doi:10.11852/zgetbjzz2021-1640

Abstract

Abstract: Objective To translate and revise Child Riding Risk Behavior Diagnostic Scale(CRRBDS), and to evaluate the reliability and validity test of Chinese version of CRRBDS. Methods After obtaining the authorization of the original author of RBDS, the English version of CRRBDS was translated, retranslated and cross-culturally adjusted by using Brislin translation mode to form the Chinese version of CRRBDS. Then the Chinese version of CRRBDS was used to investigate the parents of child healthcare department in a triple A hospital in Qingdao and the parents of children in a kindergarten in Qingdao, so as to evaluate its reliability and validity. Results The CRRBDS contained 16 items divided into 5 dimensions, including type selection cognition, response efficacy, self-efficacy, perceived severity and perceptual susceptibility, with the cumulative variance contribution rate of 72.939%. The correlation coefficient between the scores of each item and the total score ranged from 0.550 to 0.697. The content validity index(I-CVI) of the Chinese version of CRRBDS items ranged from 0.800 to 1.000, and the content validity index(S-CVI) of the scale level was 0.950. The Cronbach's α coefficient of the scale was 0.886, the split-half reliability coefficient was 0.931 and the test-retest reliability coefficient was 0.862. Conclusion The Chinese version of the CRRBDS has good reliability and validity, which can be used to measure parents' diagnosis of children's riding risk behavior.

Key words: Child Riding Risk Behavior Diagnosis Scale, reliability, validity, children

摘要： 目的翻译并汉化适合我国0～6岁儿童家长的儿童乘车风险行为诊断量表(CRRBDS),并检验其信度和效度。方法获取量表原作者授权后,采用Brislin翻译模式对英文版儿童乘车风险行为诊断量表进行翻译、回译、文化调试,形成中文版CRRBDS;利用中文版CRRBDS对青岛市某三甲医院儿童保健科的儿童父母、青岛市某幼儿园的幼儿家长进行调查,以评价量表的信效度。结果中文版CRRBDS包含类型选择认知、反应效能、自我效能、感知严重性、感知易感性5个维度,共16个条目,累积方差贡献率为72.939%;各项目得分与总分的相关系数为0.550～0.697;中文版CRRBDS条目水平的内容效度指数(I-CVI)为0.800～1.000,量表水平的内容效度指数(S-CVI)为0.950;量表总体的Cronbach's α系数为0.886,折半信度为0.931,重测信度为0.862。结论中文版CRRBDS具有较好的信效度,可以用于测量父母对儿童乘车风险行为的诊断。

关键词: 儿童乘车风险行为诊断量表, 信度, 效度, 儿童

CLC Number:

R179

SUN Ya-ru, LIU Ting, YIN Cui-yan, WANG Xin, NIU Yu-shuo, LI Kui-nan, YANG Xiu-ling. Reliability and validity test of Chinese version of the Child Riding Risk Behavior Diagnostic Scale[J]. Chinese Journal of Child Health Care, 2022, 30(10): 1063-1067.

孙亚茹, 刘婷, 尹翠艳, 王欣, 牛玉硕, 李葵南, 杨秀玲. 儿童乘车风险行为诊断量表的汉化及信效度检验[J]. 中国儿童保健杂志, 2022, 30(10): 1063-1067.

References

[1] 杜文聪,俞浩,周金意,等.2017年江苏省居民伤害发生特征及疾病负担分析[J].上海预防医学,2021,33(9):813-817.
[2] Naranjo M.The safest car seat for your child[J].Consum Rep,2017,82(1):56-58.
[3] 汽车与安全杂志编辑部.道路交通事故成儿童伤害重要原因[J].汽车与安全,2018,24(11):49-50.
[4] 李葵南,牛玉硕,孙孟珂,等.儿童道路交通安全现况及干预措施研究进展[J].中国学校卫生,2021,42(6):950-955,960.
[5] World Health Organization. World report on road traffic injury prevention:summary[R]. Geneva: World Health Organisation,2018.
[6] 王克辉.最好的“六一”礼物是配备儿童安全座椅专家呼吁:中国儿童乘车安全需要法治善治共治[J].汽车与安全,2021,27(6):70-71.
[7] 冯俊琳,方力,陆扬,等.上海某社区部分3～6岁儿童乘车安全座椅使用现况[J].上海预防医学,2018,30(11):937-942.
[8] 傅静媚,陈福祥,彭哲宽,等.2017年汕头市城区儿童约束系统使用情况调查[J/OL].伤害医学(电子版),2018,7(3):33-40.
[9] Kidman R,Piccolo LR,Kohler HP.Adverse childhood experiences: prevalence and association with adolescent health in Malawi[J].Am J Prev Med,2020,58(2):285-293.
[10] 林泽婷,雷珲倩,李丽萍.短期教育干预与实践干预对提升儿童安全座椅认知水平的研究[J/OL].伤害医学:电子版,2019,8(1):29-35.
[11] Will KE, Decina LE, Maple EL, et al. Examining the relative effectiveness of different message framing strategies for child passenger safety:Recommendations for increased comprehension and compliance[J]. Accid Anal Prev,2015,79:170-181.
[12] 吴明隆.问卷统计分析实务:SPSS操作与应用[M].重庆:重庆大学出版社,2010:59-60.
[13] Witte K,Cameron KA, McKeon JK, et al. Predicting risk behaviors:Development and validation of a diagnostic scale[J]. J Health Commun,1996,1(4):317-41.
[14] Brislin RW. Back-translation for cross-cultural research[J]. J Cross Cult Psychol,1970,1(3):185-216.
[15] Beaton DE,Bombardier C,Guillemin F,et al.Guidelines for the process of cross cultural adaptation of self report measures[J].Spine(Phila Pa1976),2000,25(24):3186-3191.
[16] 徐梦蕾,王书梅.儿童及青少年出行安全与交通伤害预防[J].上海预防医学,2021,33(9):861-868.
[17] Fayard G. Road injury prevention in China:Current state and future challenges[J]. J Public Health Policy,2019,40(3):292-307.
[18] 洛尘.国务院印发《中国儿童发展纲要(2021—2030年)》[J].青春期健康,2021,19(21):41.
[19] 李为翊,高淑娜,何丽华,等. 家庭乘用车儿童安全座椅使用现场观察分析[J]. 中国儿童保健杂志,2018,26(8):906-909.
[20] 赵情,王亚飞.“交通强国”目标下的儿童交通安全状况分析[J].汽车与安全,2020,26(8):84-89.
[21] Polit DF,Beck CT.The content validity index:are you sure you know what's being reported? Critique and recommenddtions[J]. Res Nurs Health,2006,29(5):489-497.
[22] 胡雁.护理研究[M].北京:人民卫生出版社,2012:128.