家庭干预支持度对高危儿运动功能早期干预效果的影响

doi:10.11852/zgetbjzz2022-1419

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 目的探讨家庭干预的投入程度与0～3岁高危儿运动功能干预效果的关系,以期为高危儿早期干预策略提供思路。方法将2020年6月—2022年4月江苏省妇幼保健院儿童保健科收治的81例运动发育迟缓高危儿纳入研究进行随访。所有患儿定期进行医院干预,同时予以家庭指导,根据平均每日家庭参与干预时长将患儿分为<15min/d组和≥15min/d组。分别于干预前及干预3个月后采用Peabody运动发育量表评估患儿的运动功能水平,比较干预效果。结果全部患儿干预后粗大运动发育商(GMQ)、精细运动发育商(FMQ)、总体运动发育商(TMQ)均高于干预前,差异均有统计学意义(t=5.250、5.601、5.705,P<0.05);进一步分组比较,开始干预年龄段为0~12月龄与13~36月龄的患儿在<15min/d组和≥15min/d组中,干预后GMQ、FMQ、TMQ较干预前均提高,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05);<15min/d组中和≥15min/d组中,0~12月龄患儿干预后GMQ、FMQ、TMQ较13~36月龄患儿均提高得更多,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);头颅MRI异常患儿的家庭比无异常患儿的家庭更容易每日投入较多干预时间(χ²=4.516,P=0.034),干预后GMQ、FMQ、TMQ提高得也更多,差异均有统计学意义(t=2.104、2.264、2.757,P<0.05)。结论医院康复干预结合家庭干预的早期干预训练模式对提高0~3岁运动发育迟缓高危儿的运动功能有较好的促进作用,投入程度较高以及尽早开始投入的家庭干预能更好地改善患儿运动发育水平。患儿头颅MRI结果对家庭干预的积极性及干预效果有一定程度的影响。

关键词: 高危儿, 早期干预, 家庭干预, 运动发育迟缓

Abstract: Objective To explore the relationship between the involvement degree of family intervention and the effect of motor function intervention on high-risk infants aged 0 to 3 years, in order to provide ideas for early intervention strategies for high-risk infants. Methods From June 2020 to April 2022, 81 high-risk infants with motor development retardation were included in this study for follow-up. All children received regular intervention in hospital and family guidance, and were divided into group with intervention frequency of <15min/d and group with intervention frequency of ≥15min/d according to the average length of daily family intervention. The level of children′s motor function was evaluated with Peabody Developmental Motor Scale (PDMS-2) before and 3 months after the intervention, and the intervention effect was compared. Results After intervention, gross motor development quotient (GMQ), fine motor development quotient (FMQ) and total motor development quotient (TMQ) of all children were significantly higher than those before intervention (t=5.250, 5.601, 5.705, P<0.05). Further group comparison showed that the GMQ, FMQ and TMQ both in children aged 0 - 12 months and 13 - 36 months were significantly higher than those before intervention in group with intervention frequency of <15min/d and group with intervention frequency of ≥15min/d (P<0.05), but the GMQ, FMQ and TMQ of children aged 0 - 12 months after intervention were significantly higher than those of children aged 13 - 36 months (P<0.05). Families of children with abnormal cranial MRI were more likely to devote more time to the intervention each day than families of children without abnormalities (χ²=4.516, P=0.034), and GMQ, FMQ and TMQ all improved significantly more in families of children with abnormal cranial MRI after the intervention (t=2.104,2.264,2.757,P<0.05). Conclusions The early intervention training mode of hospital rehabilitation intervention combined with family intervention has a good promotion effect on improving the motor function of high-risk children with motor retardation aged 0 - 3 years. Family interventions that involve a higher level of investment and an early start are more likely to improve children′s motor development. The findings of the child′s cranial MRI have a certain influence on the family motivation and the effectiveness of the intervention.

Key words: high-risk children, early intervention, family intervention, delayed motor development

中图分类号:

R179

秦月意, 田甜, 陆晓. 家庭干预支持度对高危儿运动功能早期干预效果的影响[J]. 中国儿童保健杂志, 2023, 31(11): 1168-1173.

QIN Yueyi, TIAN Tian, LU Xiao. Influence of family support on the effect of early intervention on motor function in high-risk children[J]. Chinese Journal of Child Health Care, 2023, 31(11): 1168-1173.

参考文献

[1] 王俊峰,朱莲.高危儿与正常婴幼儿发育商的影响因素分析[J].中国妇幼保健,2021,36(4):829-831.
Wang JF,Zhu L.Analysis of influential factors on developmental quotient of high-risk infants and normal infants[J].Chin Matern Child Health Care,2021,36(4):829-831.(in Chinese)
[2] 周峰,蒋黎艳,高萍萍.Peabody运动发育量表结合配套运动训练方案在运动发育迟缓儿童中早期干预效果[J].中国儿童保健杂志,2022,30(6):603-606.
Zhou F,Jiang LY,Gao PP.Effect of Peabody Developmental Motor Scales and the motor activities program in early intervention of children with motor development retardation[J].Chin J Child Health Care,2022,30(6):603-606.(in Chinese)
[3] 蔡项青,陈红芳,项锦镜.早期干预对152例早产儿体格和神经发育的影响[J].中国医师进修杂志,2020,43(6):552-555.
Cai XQ,Chen HF,Xiang JJ.Effect of early intervention on physical and neurological development of 152 premature infants[J].Chin J Postgraduates of Medicine,2020,43(6):552-555.(in Chinese)
[4] 林玲,张丽珊,章依文,等.早期综合干预对高危儿婴儿期运动和认知发育的影响[J].中国儿童保健杂志,2020,28(12):1313-1316.
Lin L,Zhang LS,Zhang YW,et al.Effects of comprehensive intervention on motor and cognitive development of high-risk infants[J].Chin J Child Health Care,2020,28(12):1313-1316.(in Chinese)
[5] 李航渝,李萍.早期家庭干预对改善高危儿发育商的效果研究[J].中国卫生标准管理,2019,10(19):29-31.
Li HY,Li P.Effect of early family intervention on improving developmental quotient of high-risk infants[J].Chin Health Standard Management,2019,10(19):29-31.(in Chinese)
[6] 李明,武元.运动发育迟缓的早期识别与诊断[J].中国实用儿科杂志,2016,31(10):743-747.
Li M,Wu Y.Early identification and diagnosis of motor developmental delay[J].Chin J Prac Pediatr,2016,31(10):743-747.(in Chinese)
[7] 杨玉凤.高危儿健康管理新理念[J].中国儿童保健杂志,2019,27(2):117-118,122.
Yang YF.New concept of health management for high-risk infants[J].Chin J Child Health Care,2019,27(2):117-118,122.(in Chinese)
[8] 邬思.脑循环治疗仪联合综合康复训练治疗脑瘫患儿的效果观察[J].青岛医药卫生,2021,53(6):448-450.
Wu S.Effect of cerebral circulation therapy instrument combined with comprehensive rehabilitation training in children with cerebral palsy[J].Qingdao Medical Journal,2021,53(6):448-450.(in Chinese)
[9] 鲍秀兰.0~3岁儿童最佳的人生开端[M].北京:中国发展出版社,2006.
Bao XL.The best start of life for children aged 0~3[M].Beijing:China Development Press,2006.(in Chinese)
[10] 刘振寰,戴淑凤.儿童运动发育迟缓康复训练图谱[M].北京:北京大学医学出版社,2007.
Liu ZH,Dai SF.Rehabilitation training atlas for children with motor retardation[M].Beijing:Peking University Medical Press,2007.(in Chinese)
[11] 徐璇,陈茉弦,唐欣,等.Peabody运动发育量表在脑性瘫痪中的应用研究进展[J].中国康复医学杂志,2019,34(9):1121-1124.
Xu X,Chen MX,Tang X,et al.Progress in the application of Peabody Motor Development Scale in cerebral palsy[J].Chin.J.Rehabil.Med,2019,34(9):1121-1124.(in Chinese)
[12] Gill K, Osiovich A, Synnes A, et al. Concurrent validity of the Bayley-Ⅲ and the Peabody Developmental Motor Scales-2 at 18 months[J].Phys Occup Ther Pediatr,2019,39(5):514-524.
[13] 潘燕燕,董超群,赵娴,等.个性化家庭干预对婴儿神经心理发育的效果评价[J].数理医药学杂志,2021,34(6):907-910.
Pan YY,Dong CQ,Zhao X,et al.Effect evaluation of individualized family intervention on infant neuropsychological development[J].J.Math.Med,2021,34(6):907-910.(in Chinese)
[14] 中华医学会儿科学分会发育行为学组,中国医师协会儿科分会儿童保健学组.中国低龄孤独症谱系障碍患儿家庭干预专家共识[J].中华儿科杂志,2022,60(5):395-400.
The Subspecialty Group of Developmental and Behavioral Pediatrics,the Society of Pediatrics,Chinese Medical Association,the Subspecialty Group of Child Health Care,the Society of Pediatrics,Chinese Medical Doctor Association.Expert consensus on family intervention for young children with autism spectrum disorder in China[J].Chin J Pediatr,2022,60(5):395-400.(in Chinese)
[15] 范爱萍,范美兰.肢体功能训练联合家庭干预对粗大运动发育落后早产儿的效果[J].中外医学研究,2020,18(10):160-162.
Fan AP,Fan ML.Effect limb function training combined with family intervention on premature infants with gross motor retardation[J].Chinese and Foreign Medical Research,2020,18(10):160-162.(in Chinese)
[16] 尹春岚,奚翔云,童梅玲,等.婴幼儿家庭养育照护指导需求分析[J].中国儿童保健杂志,2023,31(1):32-36.
Yin CL,Xi XY,Tong ML,et al.Analysis on the needs of family nurturing guidance for infants[J].Chin J Child Health Care,2023,31(1):32-36.(in Chinese)
[17] 顾丽慧,沈敏,徐纯鑫,等.家庭康复结合机构康复对脑性瘫痪患儿早期康复疗效的影响[J].中国康复医学杂志,2019,34(6):656-660.
Gu LH,Shen M,Xu CX,et al.Effects of family recovery combined with institutional recovery on early rehabilitation of children with cerebral palsy[J].Chin J Rehabil Med,2019,34(6):656-660.(in Chinese)
[18] Festante F,Antonelli C,Chorna O,et al.Parent-infant interaction during the first year of life in infants at high risk for cerebral palsy:A systematic review of the literature[J].Neural Plast,2019(2019):1-19.
[19] 罗翠仪.家庭干预训练对高危儿运动发育的影响研究[J].世界复合医学,2021,7(12):8-12.
Luo CY.Research on the effect of family intervention training on the sports development of high-risk children[J].World Journal of Complex Medicine,2021,7(12):8-12.(in Chinese)
[20] Larsson J,Nyborg L,Psouni E.The role of family function and triadic interaction on preterm child development-a systematic review[J].Children (Basel),2022,9(11):1695.
[21] 潘施旭,王佳,武丽杰.孤独症谱系障碍家庭干预国际热点与趋势分析[J].中国学校卫生,2022,43(6): 880-883.
Pan SX,Wang J,Wu LJ.Global research hotspots and trends of family intervention for ASD[J].Chin J Sch Health,2022,43(6): 880-883.(in Chinese)
[22] Hadders-Algra M.Early diagnostics and early intervention in neurodevelopmental disorders-age-dependent challenges and opportunities[J].J Clin Med,2021,10(4):861.
[23] Balen LC,Dijkstra LJ,Dirks T,et al.Early intervention and postural adjustments during reaching in infants at risk of cerebral palsy[J].Pediatr Phys Ther,2019,31(2):175-183.
[24] 邓增稳,张欠,段晓丽,等.脑瘫高危儿早期综合干预效果观察[J].河北医药,2021,43(2):239-242.
Deng ZW,Zhang Q,Duan XL,et al.The clinical effects of early comprehensive intervention for high risk infants[J].Hebei Med J,2021,43(2):239-242.(in Chinese)
[25] 王臣,张超,潘少华.超早期干预对脑瘫高风险儿神经和运动发育的影响[J].温州医科大学学报,2021,51(4):298-302.
Wang C,Zhang C,Pan SH.Effect of ultra-early intervention on nerve and motor development in infants at high risk of cerebral palsy[J].J Wenzhou Med Univ,2021,51(4):298-302.(in Chinese)
[26] 何喜宁,刘俐,侯新芳,等.高危儿早期干预策略的临床研究[J].中国妇幼健康研究,2019,30(9):1129-1132.
He XN,Liu L,Hou XF,et al.Clinical study on early intercention strategies for high-sik infants[J].Chinese Journal of Woman and Child Health Research,2019,30(9):1129-1132.(in Chinese)
[27] Krishna CG,Ramaswamy S,Seshadri S.Integrating child protection and mental health concerns in the early childhood care and development program in India[J].Indian Pediatr,2021,15,58(6):576-583.