不同语言评估工具在12月龄高危儿语言发育评估中的应用价值

doi:10.11852/zgetbjzz2023-0724

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 目的探讨不同语言评估工具在12月龄高危儿语言发育评估中的应用价值,筛选出简便有效的语言评估工具。方法选取2022年3月—2023年5月在贵阳市妇幼保健院儿童保健科高危儿门诊随访的11~13月龄的217例高危儿作为研究对象,分别使用早期语言发育进程量表(ELMS)、汉语沟通发展量表-普通话版本(PCDI)和年龄与发育进程量表-第三版(ASQ-3)进行语言评估,并以Gesell发育量表作为金标准,计算三种评估工具的受试者工作特征曲线下面积(AUC)、灵敏度、特异度、正确率、阳性预测值、阴性预测值、约登指数、Kappa值;应用Spearman相关分析不同语言评估方法之间的相关性;采用逼近理想解的排序(TOPSIS)对三种评估工具进行综合评价。结果 1)217例高危儿中最多是早产儿78例(35.94%),Gesell、ELMS、PCDI-理解、PCDI-会说及ASQ-3检出语言发育迟缓的比例分别为5.5%、7.8%、36.4%、30.0%、11.5%;2)ASQ-3与Gesell相关性最强(r_s=0.607,P＜0.01),ASQ-3的AUC最大(AUC=0.812,P＜0.05),ASQ-3与Gesell评估一致性中等(Kappa=0.56,P＜0.01),ASQ-3的灵敏度(91.7%)、正确率(93.1%)、阴性预测值(99.5%)和约登指数(0.85)最高,ELMS的特异度(94.6%)最高;3)采用TOPSIS对三种评估工具进行综合评价,ASQ-3最优,ELMS次之,PCDI-理解最差。结论 ASQ-3在11~13月龄高危儿语言筛查中的应用价值较好,未来可能需要拓展年龄范围和建立ELMS和PCDI的全国性常模。

关键词: 高危儿, 语言评估, 评估工具

Abstract: Objective To explore the application value of different language assessment tools in the assessment of language development of 12-month-old high-risk infants, and to screen out simple and valid language assessment tools. Methods A total of 217 11- to 13-month-old high-risk infants who were followed up at the outpatient service for high-risk infants at the child health clinic of Guiyang Maternal and Child Health Hospital from March 2022 to May 2023 were selected as the study subjects. Their language was evaluated by Early Language Milestone Scale (ELMS), Putonghua Communicative Development Inventory (PCDI) and Ages and Stages Questionnaire-Third Edition (ASQ-3). With Gesell as the gold standard for the assessment of language, the area under receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, Youden index and Kappa value of the three tools were calculated. Spearman correlation analysis was used to analyze the correlation between the different language assessment scales. The Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS) was used to evaluate the three tools. Results 1)Among 217 high-risk infants, 78 preterm infants was the most (35.94%). The rate of delayed language development detected by Gesell, ELMS, PCDI-comprehension, PCDI-expression, ASQ-3 were 5.5%, 7.8%, 36.4%, 30.0% and 11.5%, respectively. 2)ASQ-3 had the strongest correlation with Gesell language region (r_s=0.607, P＜0.01) and it had the most AUC (AUC=0.812, P＜0.05). The consistency between ASQ-3 and Gesell was moderate (Kappa=0.56, P＜0.01). ASQ-3 had the highest sensitivity(91.7%), accuracy(93.1%), negative predictive value(99.5%) and Youden index(0.85), and ELMS had the highest specificity(94.6%). 3) Comprehensive evaluation of three tools by the TOPSIS indicated that ASQ-3 was the best, followed by ELMS and PCDI-comprehension was the worse. Conclusion Among the three assessment tools, ASQ-3 has the highest value in assessing the language development of 11- to 13-month-old high risk infants, and it may be necessary to expand the age range and establish a national norm of ELMS and PCDI in the future.

Key words: high-risk infant, language assessment, assessment tools

中图分类号:

R179

简兰英, 骆艳, 朱焱, 沈成威, 涂可心, 覃会玲, 金骊芳. 不同语言评估工具在12月龄高危儿语言发育评估中的应用价值[J]. 中国儿童保健杂志, 2024, 32(2): 149-153.

JIAN Lanying, LUO Yan, ZHU Yan, SHEN Chengwei, TU Kexin, QIN Huiling, JIN Lifang. Application value of different language assessment tools in language development assessment of 12-month-old high-risk infants[J]. Chinese Journal of Child Health Care, 2024, 32(2): 149-153.

参考文献

[1] 张悦, 邵洁, 吴婕翎. 高危儿规范化健康管理专家共识[J]. 中国儿童保健杂志, 2023, 31(6):581-585,622.
Zhang Y, Shao J, Wu JL. Experts' consensus on standardized health management of high-risk infants[J]. Chin J Child Health Care, 2023, 31(6):581-585,622. (in Chinese)
[2] Mirnia K, Akrami F, Jodeiry B, et al. Clinical outcomes of high-risk infant follow-up program in a Tertiary care centre[J]. Iran J Nurs Midwifery Res, 2017, 22(6):476-480.
[3] Abou-Elsaad T, Abdel-Hady H, Baz H, et al. Language and cognitive outcome for high-risk neonates at the age of 2 - 3 years-experience from an Arab Country[J]. World J Clin Pediatr, 2017, 6(1):24-33.
[4] 郝燕, 赵瑾珠. 家长实施的儿童早期语言干预策略[J]. 中国儿童保健杂志, 2022, 30(8):818-821.
Hao Y, Zhao JZ. Parent-implemented early language intervention strategies for children[J]. Chin J Child Health Care,2022, 30(8):818-821. (in Chinese)
[5] Horwitz SM, Irwin JR, Briggs-Gowan MJ, et al. Language delay in a community cohort of young children[J]. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry, 2003, 42(8):932-940.
[6] Vermeij BaM, Wiefferink CH, Knoors H, et al. Effects in language development of young children with language delay during early intervention[J]. J Commun Disord, 2023, 103:106326.
[7] 王媛. 养育者沟通技能对婴幼儿早期语言发展的影响[J]. 世界最新医学信息文摘, 2021, 21(94):55-56.
Wang Y. Influence of caregiver communication skills on early language development of infants and young children.[J]. World Latest Medicine Information,2021, 21(94):55-56. (in Chinese)
[8] 赵珊珊, 姚拥华, 许锦平, 等. 基于门诊的厦门儿童语言发育迟缓相关因素前瞻性队列研究[J]. 中华实用儿科临床杂志, 2021, 36(14):1094-1097.
Zhao SS, Yao YH, Xu JP, et al. Prospective cohort study and risk factor analysis of language delay based on outpatient in Xiamen[J]. Chin J Appl Clin Pediatr,2021, 36(14):1094-1097. (in Chinese)
[9] 刘仕祺, 武元, 边旸, 等. 《年龄与发育进程问卷》中文版在高危儿童发育筛查中效度验证[J]. 中国循证儿科杂志, 2016, 11(6):436-440.
Liu SQ, Wu Y, Bian Y, et al. The validity of the Chinese version of ASQ in high risk children[J]. Chin J Evid Based Pediatr,2016, 11(6):436-440. (in Chinese)
[10] 何满芬. 门诊体检婴幼儿语言发育筛查分析[J]. 实用医药杂志, 2011, 28(12):1075-1076.
He MF. Screening analysis of language development of infants in outpatient physical examination[J]. J Practical Medicine&Pharmacy,2011, 28(12):1075-1076. (in Chinese)
[11] 梁卫兰, 郝波, 王爽, 等. 中文早期语言与沟通发展量表--普通话版的再标准化[J]. 中国儿童保健杂志, 2001, 9(5):295-297.
Liang WL, Hao B, Wang S, et al. The study of Chinese language and communicative development-word part[J]. Chin J Child Health Care,2001, 9(5):295-297. (in Chinese)
[12] 桑葵, 刘易苏. 《年龄及发育进程问卷(ASQ-3)》对儿童发育早期筛查及干预的价值分析[J]. 中国妇幼保健, 2020, 35(5):858-860.
Sang K, Liu YS. The value of Ages and Stages Questionnaire-Third Edition(ASQ-3) in early screening and intervention of children's development[J]. Maternal and Child Health Care of China, 2020, 35(5):858-860. (in Chinese)
[13] Zhou XH. Statistical methods in diagnostic medicine[M].New York:Wiley-Interscience.
[14] 刘晓, 金星明, 章依文. 上海市婴幼儿语言发育常模研究[J]. 中华儿科杂志, 2007, 45(12):942-943.
Liu X, Jin XM, Zhang YW. The study of the norm of infants language development in Shanghai[J]. Chin J Pediatr,2007, 45(12):942-943.(in Chinese)
[15] 谭震灵(美). 汉语沟通发展量表使用手册[M]. 北京:北京大学医学出版社, 2008:70-71.
Tardif T.Handbook of Chinese Communication Development Scale[M].Beijing:Peking University Medical Publisher,2008:70-71.(in Chinese)
[16] Tian Y, Zhang C, Yu G, et al. Influencing factors of the neurodevelopment of high-risk infants[J]. Gen Psychiatr, 2018, 31(3):e100034.
[17] Nepomuceno PF, Perissinoto J, Strufaldi MWL, et al. School and language performance in children born with low birth weight[J]. J Pediatr (Rio J), 2023, 99(4):385-390.
[18] 王粉燕, 张冀莉, 闫琦. 婴幼儿语言早期发展1 509例资料分析[J]. 中国妇幼健康研究, 2013, 24(3):282-284.
Wang FY, Zhang JL, Yan Q. Clinical data analysis of language development of 1 509 infants[J]. Chin J Woman and Child Health Research,2013, 24(3):282-284.(in Chinese)
[19] 金星明, 马骏, 章依文, 等. 儿童最初表达50个词语发展进程的初步研究[J]. 中国循证儿科杂志, 2009, 4(3):301-305.
Jin XM,Ma J,Zhang YW, et al. A preliminary study on development of the Chinese children's first 50 words[J]. Chin J Evid Based Pediatr, 2009, 4(3):301-305. (in Chinese)
[20] 张勇, 李燕晖, 梁静, 等. 早产儿2岁内神经心理发育的队列研究[J]. 中国儿童保健杂志, 2020, 28(6):703-705.
Zhang Y, Li YH, Liang J, et al. Cohort study on neuropsychological development in preterm infants under 2 years old[J]. Chin J Child Health Care,2020, 28(6):703-705. (in Chinese)
[21] 黄海燕, 陆岸锋, 黄国盛, 等. 早产儿生后24个月龄的神经心理发育研究[J]. 中国儿童保健杂志, 2018, 26(4):424-426.
Huang HY, Lu AF, Huang GS, et al. Study on neuropsychological development of preterm infants at the age of 24 months old after birth[J]. Chin J Child Health Care,2018, 26(4):424-426. (in Chinese)
[22] Li JJ, Jiang S, Zhu ML, et al. Comparison of three frailty Scales for Prediction of adverse outcomes among older adults:A prospective cohort study[J]. J Nutr Health Aging,2021;25(4):419-424.
[23] 张瑞芳, 周凤娟, 章依文. 语言发育迟缓儿童的发育水平剖析[J]. 临床儿科杂志, 2010, 28(8):718-720.
Zhang RF, Zhou FJ, Zhang YW. Analysis of development levels of children with delayed language development[J]. J Clin Pediatr,2010, 28(8):718-720. (in Chinese)
[24] 刘超, 李诚善. 0～3岁儿童心理行为发育预警征与Gesell发育评估一致性分析[J]. 中国儿童保健杂志, 2022, 30(10):1141-1143.
Liu C, Li CS. Consistency between early warning signs of psychological and behavioral development and Gesell Development Scale of children aged 0 to 3 years[J]. Chin J Child Health Care,2022, 30(10):1141-1143. (in Chinese)
[25] 卞晓燕, 姚国英, Jane S, 等. 年龄与发育进程问卷上海市儿童常模及心理测量学特性研究[J]. 中华儿科杂志, 2010, 48(7):492-496.
Bian XY, Yao GY, Jane S, et al. Studies of norm and psychometric properties of Ages and Stages Questionnaires in Shanghai children[J]. Chin J Pediatr,2010, 48(7):492-496. (in Chinese)
[26] 魏梅, 卞晓燕, Squires J, 等. 年龄与发育进程问卷中国常模及心理测量学特性研究[J]. 中华儿科杂志, 2015, 53(12):913-918.
Wei M, Bian XY, Squires J, et al. Studies of norm and psychometrical properties of the ages and stages questionnaires, third edition, with a Chinese national sample[J]. Chin J Pediatr,2015, 53(12):913-918. (in Chinese)
[27] Schonhaut L, Maturana A, Cepeda O, et al. Predictive validity of Developmental Screening Questionnaires for Identifying Children With Later Cognitive or Educational Difficulties:A systematic review[J]. Front Pediatr, 2021, 9:698549.