儿童用家庭功能评估量表的信度和效度研究

doi:10.11852/zgetbjzz2017-25-09-02

中国儿童保健杂志 ›› 2017, Vol. 25 ›› Issue (9): 868-867.DOI: 10.11852/zgetbjzz2017-25-09-02

儿童用家庭功能评估量表的信度和效度研究

栾风焕¹,杜亚松¹,钟向阳²,李梦瑶¹,周慧鸣¹,程永琛³

1 上海交通大学医学院附属精神卫生中心,上海 200030;
2 上海市静安区教育学院,上海 200040;
3 上海市浦东教育发展研究院,上海 200120

收稿日期:2017-02-28 发布日期:2017-09-10 出版日期:2017-09-10
通讯作者: 杜亚松, E-mail:yasongdu@163.com
作者简介:栾风焕(1991-),女,山东人,在读硕士,主要研究方向为儿童青少年心理卫生
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金面上项目(81271510)

Validity and reliability of the Family Functioning Assessment Scale for Children

LUAN Feng-huan¹,DU Ya-song¹,ZHONG Xiang-yang²,LI Meng-yao¹,ZHOU Hui-ming¹,CHENG Yong-chen³

1 Shanghai Mental Health Center,Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine,Shanghai 200030,China;
2 Shanghai Jing'an District College of Education,Shanghai 200040,China;
3 Shanghai Pudong Education Development Institute,Shanghai 200120,China

Received:2017-02-28 Online:2017-09-10 Published:2017-09-10
Contact: DU Ya-song,E-mail:yasongdu@163.com

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 目的检验儿童用家庭功能评估量表(FFAS-C)的信度和效度。方法选取上海市7～12岁学龄期儿童2 931名,以年龄和年级为主要变量按比例分层抽样。所有儿童填写FFAS-C,家长填写家庭功能评估量表-总的功能(GF)。对255名儿童间隔21 d后以同样的程序对FFAS-C进行重测。结果 FFAS-C的Cronbach's α系数为0.808,各维度的内部一致性信度系数在0.603～0.729之间,量表各条目得分与量表总分的Pearson相关系数在0.431～0.607之间(P＜0.01),Spearman-Brown分半信度系数为0.822,Guttman分半信度值为0.815,重测相关系数为0.74(P＜0.01);探索性因子分析结果显示FFAS-C可以分为3个因子,使用验证性因子分析进行检验,三因子模型适配度较好;根据GF得分划分的GF高分组在FFAS-C总分和各维度得分均高于GF低分组(P＜0.01)。结论 FFAS-C具有较好的信度和效度。

关键词: 家庭功能评估量表, 家庭功能, 信度, 效度, 心理测量学

Abstract: Objective To test the reliability and validity of the Family Functioning Assessment Scale for Children (FFAS-C).Methods A total of 2 931 children aged 7~12 years old in Shanghai were selected and stratified by age and grade as the main variables.All children filled out FFAS-C,their parents completed the Family Function Device-the General Function (GF).FFAS-C was retested with the same procedure after 255 days of interval.Results The Cronbach's α coefficient of FFAS-C was 0.808,and the internal consistency reliability coefficient of each dimension was between 0.603 and 0.729.The Pearson correlation coefficient of each item and the total score was between 0.431 and 0.607 (P＜0.01).Spearman-Brown half confidence coefficient was 0.822,Guttman half confidence was 0.815,the retest correlation coefficient was 0.74 (P＜0.01).The results of exploratory factor analysis showed that FFAS-C could be divided into three factors,which were verified by confirmatory factor analysis.The high-score group of GF was higher than those of score group-low of GF in the total score and each dimension score of FFAS-C (P＜0.01).Conclusion The FFAS-C has good reliability and validity.

Key words: Family Functioning Assessment Scale for Children, family function, reliability, validity, psychometrics

中图分类号:

R179

栾风焕,杜亚松,钟向阳,李梦瑶,周慧鸣,程永琛. 儿童用家庭功能评估量表的信度和效度研究[J]. 中国儿童保健杂志, 2017, 25(9): 868-867.

LUAN Feng-huan,DU Ya-song,ZHONG Xiang-yang,LI Meng-yao,ZHOU Hui-ming,CHENG Yong-chen. Validity and reliability of the Family Functioning Assessment Scale for Children[J]. journal1, 2017, 25(9): 868-867.

参考文献

[1] 栾风焕,杜亚松.家庭功能评估量表的应用现状[J].中国儿童保健杂志,2016,24(12):1287-1289.
[2] Stratton P,Bland J,Janes E,et al.Developing an indicator of family function and a practicable outcome measure for systemic family and couple therapy:the SCORE[J].Journal of Family Therapy,2010,32(3):232-258.
[3] Cahill P,O'Reilly K,Carr A,et al.Validation of a 28-item version of the Systemic Clinical Outcome and Routine Evaluation in an Irish context:the SCORE-28[J].Journal of Family Therapy,2010,32(3):210-231.
[4] Vila a M,Silva JTD,Relvas AP,et al.Systemic Clinical Outcome Routine Evaluation:SCORE-15[J].Avalia o Familiar:Funcinamentoe Interven o,2014,1(1):23-41.
[5] Hamilton E,Carr A.Systematic review of self-report family assessment measures[J].Family Process,2015,15(1):1-14.
[6] Jewell T,Carr A,Stratton P,et al.Development of a children's version of the SCORE index of family function and change[J].Family Process,2013,52(4):673-684.
[7] Byles J,Byrne C,Boyle MH,et al.Ontario child health study:reliability and validity of the general functioning subscale of the McMaster Family Assessment Device[J].Family Process,1988,27(1):97-104.
[8] Mansfield AK,Keitner GI,Dealy J.The family assessment device:An update[J].Family Process,2015,54(1):82-93.
[9] Stevens J.Applied multivariate statistics for the social sciences[M]// Applied multivariate statistics for the social sciences/Routledge,2009:68-69.
[10] 吴明隆.问卷统计分析务实:SPSS操作与应用[M].重庆:重庆大学出版社,2010.
[11] 吴明隆.结构方程模型:AMOS的操作与应用[M].重庆:重庆大学出版社,2010.
[12] O'Hanrahan K,White MD,Carr A,et al.Validation of 28 and 15 item versions of the SCORE family assessment questionnaire with adult mental health service users[J].Journal of Family Therapy,2016,1-17.
[13] Fay D,Carr A,O'reilly K,et al.Irish norms for the SCORE-15 and 28 from a national telephone survey[J].Journal of Family Therapy,2013,35(1):24-42.

[1]	王婧涛, 吴骞, 魏文飞, 董柯娜, 王琳, 刘灵, 朱忠良, 卢玉山, 李晖. 中国学龄前儿童社会情绪与交流能力评估量表的研发及应用[J]. 中国儿童保健杂志, 2024, 32(7): 732-738.
[2]	潘虹地, 张悦, 杨玉凤, 郑毅, 金星明, 贾美香, 静进, 邵洁, 王惠珊. 中国婴幼儿心理行为发育里程碑检查表的编制[J]. 中国儿童保健杂志, 2024, 32(7): 739-745.
[3]	王钠, 周树青, 郭晓杰, 张昕, 池霞, 李希翎, 童梅玲. 学龄前儿童视觉认知能力评估量表的编制与信度、效度检验[J]. 中国儿童保健杂志, 2024, 32(2): 138-141.
[4]	李展权, 朱琳, 陈泽恺. 奖惩敏感性问卷的汉化及其在青少年中的信效度检验[J]. 中国儿童保健杂志, 2023, 31(9): 980-985.
[5]	孔文瑞, 许梦雪, 贾妮, 成童, 李秋菊, 刘欣, 吴燕, 冯承芸, 朱宗涵, 关宏岩. 婴幼儿家长养育照护实践自评问卷的编制及信效度检验[J]. 中国儿童保健杂志, 2023, 31(8): 825-830.
[6]	李真真, 李世懿, 于利萍, 赵琳, 韩春芳. 哮喘儿童睡眠障碍与家庭功能的现状调查及相关性分析[J]. 中国儿童保健杂志, 2023, 31(8): 846-850.
[7]	赵瑾, 张云婷, 宋映泉, 江帆. 中国儿童早期发展指数工具及常模制定[J]. 中国儿童保健杂志, 2023, 31(8): 858-863.
[8]	尹晓辉, 王葳, 张姣姣, 王洋, 许亚红. 父亲参与婴儿教养量表的汉化[J]. 中国儿童保健杂志, 2023, 31(4): 369-373.
[9]	张显达, 李雪, 廖敏. 3~6岁儿童汉语语言发育评估量表-语法篇的信效度研究[J]. 中国儿童保健杂志, 2022, 30(8): 822-827.
[10]	贾妮, 许梦雪, 丁美琦, 严双琴, 章青兰, 王宝珍, 李园园, 关宏岩. 中文版亲子互动-喂养量表的信效度初步研究[J]. 中国儿童保健杂志, 2022, 30(8): 839-844.
[11]	王佳, 黄静, 梁亚红, 席静, 王艳艳. 青少年直觉进食量表的编制及信效度检验[J]. 中国儿童保健杂志, 2022, 30(5): 553-557.
[12]	郑瑞璇, 章丽丽, 周自云, 曹佳妍, 周星, 钱雨倩, 堵飞宇, 程灶火. 婴幼儿孤独症筛查问卷的初步编制和信效度分析[J]. 中国儿童保健杂志, 2022, 30(4): 376-380.
[13]	肖婷, 肖湘, 储康康, 柯晓燕. 中文版量化的婴幼儿孤独症筛查量表信效度研究[J]. 中国儿童保健杂志, 2022, 30(4): 381-385.
[14]	黄楹, 张海峰, 童连. 婴幼儿回应性照护评价量表的初步编制与评价[J]. 中国儿童保健杂志, 2022, 30(4): 386-391.
[15]	张晶, 卞晓燕, SQUIRES Jane, 宋魏, 彭咏梅, 杜莉, 朱丽萍. 年龄与发育进程问卷:社会-情绪(第2版)中文版的效度研究[J]. 中国儿童保健杂志, 2022, 30(3): 249-253.

儿童用家庭功能评估量表的信度和效度研究

Validity and reliability of the Family Functioning Assessment Scale for Children

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics