Chinese Journal of Child Health Care ›› 2025, Vol. 33 ›› Issue (8): 924-928.DOI: 10.11852/zgetbjzz2024-0806

• Appropriate Technology • Previous Articles    

Clinical applicability of artificial intelligence bone age assessment model in children and adolescents

LI Shaowei1, HE Jinshui2, HAN Meimin1, LIU Bowen3, ZHANG Dongxu3   

  1. 1. Department of Child Health Care, Huli District Maternal and Child Health Hospital, Xiamen, Fujian 361001, China;
    2. Department of Pediatrics, Zhangzhou Hospital Affiliated to Fujian Medical University;
    3. State Key Laboratory of Molecular Vaccinology and Molecular Diagnostics, Xiamen University
  • Received:2024-08-05 Revised:2025-03-06 Online:2025-08-10 Published:2025-08-04
  • Contact: HE Jinshui, E-mail:dragonet945@163.com

人工智能骨龄评测模型在儿童青少年的临床适用性

李少维1, 何金水2, 韩梅敏1, 刘博文3, 张东旭3   

  1. 1.厦门市湖里区妇幼保健院儿童保健科,福建 厦门 361001;
    2.福建医科大学附属漳州市医院儿科;
    3.厦门大学分子疫苗学与分子诊断学国家重点实验室
  • 通讯作者: 何金水,E-mail:dragonet945@163.com
  • 作者简介:李少维(1986—),男,硕士学位,主要研究方向为儿科、儿童保健、生长发育。
  • 基金资助:
    博士工作室攀登课题(A)(PDA202105)

Abstract: Objective To explore the clinical applicability of a self-developed artificial intelligence bone age assessment model based on a North American dataset for children and adolescents. Methods Based on the Greulich-Pyle (G-P) bone age assessment method, a deep learning-based artificial intelligence bone age assessment model (AIBAA-GP) was constructed using 14 236 left-hand wrist DR images from the 2017 Radiological Society of North America (RSNA) public bone age dataset. Retrospective collection of imaging data from children who underwent left-hand wrist DR imaging at Xiamen Huli District Maternal and Child Health Hospital between September 2018 and September 2022, due to parental requests for bone age assessment, was conducted. A total of 1 709 eligible images were selected, including 867 images of boys and 842 images of girls. The AIBAA-GP model was used to assess bone age. The assessed bone age results were compared with chronological age, and the model's performance across different age groups was evaluated. Results The assessment results of AIBAA-GP model on the 1709 DR images showed statistically significant differences between bone age and chronological age (P<0.05) for boys aged 4, 5, 6, and 7 years and girls aged 3, 4, and 5 years, with mean differences within 1.6 years. By adjusting the mean differences between bone age and chronological age for each age group, the bone age assessment values for the aforementioned groups could be adjusted by -1.16, -1.14, -1.35, -1.29 years for boys and 1.59, -1.52, -1.06 years for girls, respectively. Chronological age was significantly correlated with computer-predicted bone age for boys (r=0.952) and girls (r=0.885). Conclusions The AIBAA-GP algorithm model, based on a North American population dataset, is applicable to a small portion of age groups in Chinese children and adolescents. However, adjustments are required for most age groups before it can be applied in clinical auxiliary diagnosis.

Key words: artificial intelligence, bone age assessment, adolescent, applicability

摘要: 目的 探讨基于北美数据集自主研发的人工智能骨龄评测模型对儿童青少年的临床适用性。方法 根据Greulich-Pyle骨龄计算方法(G-P法),使用2017年北美放射学会(RSNA)公开的骨龄数据集——14 236张左手腕DR平片,构建基于深度学习的儿童骨龄人工智能评测模型(AIBAA-GP)。回顾收集2018年9月—2022年9月因家长自愿要求评测骨龄而来厦门市湖里区妇幼保健院拍摄左手腕部DR平片的患儿影像学资料。选择符合条件的1 709张,男童867张,女童842张,使用AIBAA-GP模型评测骨龄。评测的骨龄结果与生活年龄进行分析比较,测试完成后获得该模型在不同年龄段的结果差异。结果 AIBAA-GP算法模型在1 709张DR平片的测评结果显示,骨龄评估结果与实际年龄间差异有统计学意义(P<0.05),分别为男童4、5、6、7岁组及女童3、4、5岁组,差异均值均在1.6岁以内。若按各年龄组骨龄评估结果与实际年龄间差异的均值进行相应调整,可将上述各组骨龄评估值分别上调-1.16、-1.14、-1.35、-1.29岁及1.59、-1.52、-1.06岁;男女童生活年龄与计算机预测骨龄显著相关(男r=0.952,r=0.885)。结论 基于北美人群数据集构建的AIBAA-GP算法模型在小部分年龄段适用于我国儿童青少年,需对大部分年龄段评估结果进行微调后方可应用于临床辅助诊断。

关键词: 人工智能, 骨龄测评, 青少年, 适用性

CLC Number: