中国婴幼儿期孤独症筛查量表的编制及信效度检验

doi:10.11852/zgetbjzz2018-1182

中国儿童保健杂志 ›› 2019, Vol. 27 ›› Issue (1): 15-18.DOI: 10.11852/zgetbjzz2018-1182

中国婴幼儿期孤独症筛查量表的编制及信效度检验

邵智^1,2, 张雅如^1,2, 赵琴¹, 郭磊²

1 重庆市第九人民医院重庆市儿童孤独症康复治疗中心,重庆 400700;
2 西南大学儿童孤独症临床康复实训研究中心,重庆 400700

收稿日期:2018-08-29 发布日期:2019-01-10 出版日期:2019-01-10
作者简介:邵智(1964-),男,重庆人,主任医师,主要研究方向为儿童心理行为、儿童孤独症康复治疗。
基金资助:
教育部人文社会科学研究青年基金项目(15YJC190003);中国博士后科学基金资助项目(2016M592614)

Development and reliability and validity test of Checklist for Chinese Infants with Autism

SHAO Zhi^1,2, ZHANG Ya-ru^1,2, ZHAO Qin¹, GUO Lei²

1 Chongqing Rehabilitation Center for Children with Autism,the Ninth People's Hospital of Chongqing,Chongqing 400700,China;
2 Rehabilitation Practice and Research Center for Children with Autism of Southwest University,Chongqing 400700,China

Received:2018-08-29 Online:2019-01-10 Published:2019-01-10

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 目的编制中国婴幼儿期孤独症筛查量表(CHCIA),用于12~24个月龄的儿童进行孤独症筛查,并检验其信效度。方法 2016年11月—2018年5月,在国内华北、华南、华西、华东、西南地区共抽取病例组(包括孤独症和发育迟缓儿童)和正常儿童组各60例,采用CHCIA量表进行评定。一周以后,对病例组进行复测,两次评定数据用于量表重测信度评价。同时,运用该量表在北京、深圳、青岛、西安、重庆、贵阳6个城市儿童保健门诊对5 369名儿童进行筛查,对量表得分大于界限分的儿童进行随访,至其2岁以上时由专科医生进行确诊。结果量表的重测信度、评分者一致性信度均大于0.9分,表明信度较好;量表各维度及总分在孤独症组、发育迟缓组和正常儿童组间差异统计学意义,表明量表分效度较好。当量表的筛查界限划定为J值时,诊断界限划定为Z值时,量表的灵敏度、特异度、阳性预测值均达到理想状态。在儿童保健门诊对正常儿童的运用中,15例量表评定为孤独症的儿童,在随访中都得到了确诊,表明量表效标效度较好。结论该量表设计较合理,信效度均较理想,符合量表的编制要求,可用于儿童孤独症的筛查和诊断。同时,该量表题目较少,使用方便,具有较高的临床推广使用价值。

关键词: 中国婴幼儿期孤独症筛查量表, 孤独症, 信度, 效度

Abstract: Objective To develop the Checklist for Chinese Infants with Autism (CHCIA) for children aged 12-24 months,and to test its reliability and validity. Methods A total of 60 children in case group(including autism children and children with language development retardation) and 60 normal children were selected in northern,southern,western,eastern and southwest of China from November 2016 to May 2018.All participants were assessed with CHICA and case group were reassessed in one week,re-test reliability was analyzed by the correlation of the two results.Meantime,5 369 children were screened with CHICIA in the child health care clinic in Beijing,Shenzhen,Qingdao,Xi'an,Chonqging and Guiyang. Children who scored more than the critical value were followed up till 2 years old. Results Coefficients of the test-retest reliability and evaluator consistency were both more than 0.9. There were significant differences on CHCIA scores in each dimension among autism group,development retardation group and normal group,indicating good discriminate validity of the scale. When critical value for screening was set up as J,diagnostic value as Z,the sensitivity,specificity,and positive predictive value all reached ideal state. Finally 15 children sreened as autism by CHICA were diagnosed with autism in the follow-up,indicating the criterion validity of CHICA was good. Conclusions The CHICA scale is well designed with good reliability,validity and criterion validity,and is qualified as a screening and diagnostic tool for autism children. Meantime,it has few items and is easy to use,which can be widely used in clinics.

Key words: the Checklist for Chinese Infants with Autism, autism, reliability, validity

中图分类号:

R749.94

邵智, 张雅如, 赵琴, 郭磊. 中国婴幼儿期孤独症筛查量表的编制及信效度检验[J]. 中国儿童保健杂志, 2019, 27(1): 15-18.

SHAO Zhi, ZHANG Ya-ru, ZHAO Qin, GUO Lei. Development and reliability and validity test of Checklist for Chinese Infants with Autism[J]. journal1, 2019, 27(1): 15-18.

参考文献

[1] American Psychiatric Association. Autism Spectrum Disorder[N/OL].[2018-04-27].http://www.dsm5.org/Documents/Autism Spectrum Disorder Fact Sheet.pdf.
[2] Carpenter LA,Boan AD,Wahlquist AE,et al. Screening and direct assessment methodology to determine the prevalence of autism spectrum disorders[J].Ann Epidemiol,2016,4(26):395-400.
[3] Rogers SJ,Talbott MR. Early identification and early treatment of autism spectrum disorder[C/OL]//International Review of Research in Developmental Disabilities,2016. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/bs.irrdd.2016.05.004
[4] TSa J,Jacoba P,Srinatha S,et al. Toddlers at risk for autism spectrum disorders from Kerala,India- a community based screening[J].Asian J Psychiatr,2018,31(1):10-12.
[5] Bryson SE,Zwaigenbaum L.Autism Observation Scale for Infants[M]//Patel V,Preedy V,Martin C.Comprehensive Guide to Autism. Springer,New York,2014.
[6] Matson JL,Kozlowski AM,Hattier MA,et al. DSM-IV vs.DSM-5 diagnostic criteria for toddlers with autism[J].Dev Neurorehabil,2012,15(3):185-190.
[7] American Psychiatric Association.Autism spectrum disorder[EB/OL].[2013-5-18].http://www.dsm5.org/Documents/Autismspectrum Disorder Fact Sheet.pdf.
[8] Thorup E,Nystrom P,Gredeback G,et al. Altered gaze following during live interaction in infants at risk for autism:an eye tracking study[J].Mol Autism,2016,7(1):12-16.
[9] Dalton JC,Craisa RE,Velleman LS. Joint attention and oromotor abilities in young children with and without autism spectrum disorder[J].J Commun Disord,2017,9(69):27-43.
[10] Wadsworth HM,Maximo JO,Lemelman AR,et al.The action imitation network and motor imitation in children and adolescents with autism[J].Neuroscience,2017,343:147-156.
[11] Sun X,Allison C,Auyeung B,et al. Service provision for autism in mainland China:a service providers perspective[J].Res Dev Disabil,2013,34(1):440-451.
[12] Huang AX,Jia M,Wheeler JJ. Children with autism in the People's Republic of China:diagnosis,legal issues,and educational services[J].J Autism Dev Disord,2013,43(9):1991-2001.
[13] Khowaja MK,Hazzard AP,Robins DL. Sociodemographic barriers to early detection of autism:screening and evaluation using the M-CHAT,M-CHAT-R,and follow-up[J].J Autism Dev Disord,2015,45(6):1797-1808.
[14] Baird G,Charman T,Baron-Cohen S,et al. A screening instrument for autism at 18 months of age:a 6-year follow-up study[J].J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry,2000,39(6):694-702.
[15] Gray A,Edwards DM,O'Callaghan MJ,et al. Screening for autism spectrum disorder in very preterm infants during early childhood[J].Early Hum Dev,2015,91(12):271-276.

中国婴幼儿期孤独症筛查量表的编制及信效度检验

Development and reliability and validity test of Checklist for Chinese Infants with Autism

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

[1]	李廷玉, 韦秋宏, 李燕, 魏华, 代英, 陈立. 养育照护融合家庭干预模式用于孤独症谱系障碍的实践与展望[J]. 中国儿童保健杂志, 2024, 32(9): 937-940.
[2]	静进. 孤独症谱系障碍“神经多样性”的观点及其评价[J]. 中国儿童保健杂志, 2024, 32(7): 709-712.
[3]	王婧涛, 吴骞, 魏文飞, 董柯娜, 王琳, 刘灵, 朱忠良, 卢玉山, 李晖. 中国学龄前儿童社会情绪与交流能力评估量表的研发及应用[J]. 中国儿童保健杂志, 2024, 32(7): 732-738.
[4]	潘虹地, 张悦, 杨玉凤, 郑毅, 金星明, 贾美香, 静进, 邵洁, 王惠珊. 中国婴幼儿心理行为发育里程碑检查表的编制[J]. 中国儿童保健杂志, 2024, 32(7): 739-745.
[5]	丛妍, 王浩, 王栋, 俞露婷, 朱晓春. 婴儿期运动发育指标在孤独症谱系障碍儿童筛查中的应用[J]. 中国儿童保健杂志, 2024, 32(7): 752-756.
[6]	陈丽丽, 关文军. 多重范例训练在孤独症儿童康复中的运用[J]. 中国儿童保健杂志, 2024, 32(5): 516-521.
[7]	张蓓, 王敏囡, 尼罗帕, 古丽加娜提·阿布拉克木, 克日曼·帕尔哈提, 何艳红, 阿曼古丽·卡德尔, 热娜·买买提. 产后早期免疫激活对小鼠孤独症样行为和胶质细胞的影响[J]. 中国儿童保健杂志, 2024, 32(4): 405-411.
[8]	杨峰. 从言语病理学角度看孤独症谱系障碍儿童的沟通障碍[J]. 中国儿童保健杂志, 2024, 32(3): 233-236.
[9]	王峰, 刘泽慧, 张艺霖, 田文茹, 杨凌渊, 邹明扬, 孙彩虹. 孤独症谱系障碍儿童外周血CNR1基因甲基化修饰水平的研究[J]. 中国儿童保健杂志, 2024, 32(3): 237-241.
[10]	侯耀奇, 宋湘勤. 运动干预改善孤独症谱系障碍儿童社会功能的研究进展[J]. 中国儿童保健杂志, 2024, 32(3): 291-295.
[11]	邹红, 朱健芳, 罗佳怡, 李丹丹, 吴迪. 孤独症谱系障碍的干预方法及发展趋势[J]. 中国儿童保健杂志, 2024, 32(3): 317-321.
[12]	蔚然, 孔锐, 关陆阳, 王永露, 叶侃. 益生菌对孤独谱系障碍患者核心症状干预效果的荟萃分析[J]. 中国儿童保健杂志, 2024, 32(3): 322-328.
[13]	胥柯, 周勤, 吴明磊, 宋丽, 柯晓燕. 孤独症谱系障碍儿童的饮食睡眠问题及相关因素[J]. 中国儿童保健杂志, 2024, 32(3): 329-333.
[14]	王钠, 周树青, 郭晓杰, 张昕, 池霞, 李希翎, 童梅玲. 学龄前儿童视觉认知能力评估量表的编制与信度、效度检验[J]. 中国儿童保健杂志, 2024, 32(2): 138-141.
[15]	干凯滟, 黄安琪, 张子一, 关陆阳, 王菲, 柯晓燕. M-CHAT筛查阳性对孤独症谱系障碍早期诊断稳定性的前瞻性研究[J]. 中国儿童保健杂志, 2024, 32(10): 1076-1079.