【Objectives】 To investigate the important function of neurobehavioral developmental monitoring and early education and intervention within the systematic management of child health care,and to provide a basis for the establishment of a newer model of child health care. 【Methods】 Forty-six normal newborns and forty-six high-risk newborns,who were born in the same period,were randomly divided into a new model group and a control group.For the normal and high-risk newborns within the new model group,beside the conventional model of child health care,regular monitoring of neurobehavioral development and early education and intervention were also carried out.For the control group only the conventional model of child health care was carried out.For each group (equally) at 3,6 months,and 1 year,a development quotient (DQ) assessment was carried out using the Gesell's Infant Development Schedule. 【Results】 1)At 3,6 months and 1 year,the DQ of the five ability areas had improved gradually for the high-risk newborns of the new model group.At 1 year they were evidently higher than the high-risk newborns of the control group.The difference had a degree of statistical significance (P<0.01).The DQ had already reached the level of the normal control group.2)Three months after birth,the DQ of the normal new model group and the normal control group showed no obvious difference (P>0.05).At 6 months and 1 year,the DQ of the 5 ability areas of the normal new model group were evidently higher than the normal control group,the difference showed a degree of statistical significance (P<0.01). 【Conclusion】 The newer model of bringing neurobehavioral developmental monitoring and early education and intervention into the systematic management of conventional child health care can promote the intellectual development of infants,and is beneficial for early childhood development.
Key words
child health care /
newer model /
neurobehavioral development /
early education /
early intervention /
developmental quotient
{{custom_sec.title}}
{{custom_sec.title}}
{{custom_sec.content}}
References
[1] 刘湘云,陈荣华,赵正言.儿童保健学[M].4版.南京:江苏科技出版社,2011:1-8.
[2] 金汉珍,黄德珉,官希杰.实用新生儿学[M].北京:人们卫生出版社,2003:4-10.
[3] 鲍秀兰.新生儿行为与0~3岁潜能开发指南[M].北京:中国商业出版社,2001:66-100,102-184.
[4] 沈晓明,金星明.发育与行为儿科学[M].南京:江苏科学技术出版社,2005:22-47.
[5] Volpe JJ.Neurology of the newborn[M].(4th edition).Philadelphia:WB Saunders Company,2011:141-146.
[6] 鲍秀兰.重视高危儿的发育风险和早期科学干预对策[J].中国儿童保健杂志,2011,19(5):393-397.
[7] 李德乐,施玉麒.规范管理和早期干预对高危儿智能的影响[J].中国儿童保健杂志,2007,15(4):401-402.
[8] 郭书娟,徐秀.高危儿0~3岁早期干预的研究进展[J].中国儿童保健杂志,2008,16(5):551-552.
[9] 李明.高危新生儿随访中的神经发育评估及其意义[J].中国新生儿杂志,2009,24(6):324-327.
[10] 鲍秀兰.0~3岁儿童教育的重要性[J].实用儿科临床杂志,2003,18(4):243-244.
[11] Aderson LM,Shinn C,Fullilove MT,et al.The effeetiveness of early childhood devempment programs A systematic reveiew[J].Am J Prev Med,2003,24(3S):32-46.
[12] 朱宗涵.儿童早期发展面临的挑战[J].中国儿童保健杂志,2005,13(1):53-55.
[13] 戴耀华,关宏岩.儿童早期综合发展[J].中国儿童保健杂志,2005,13(4):327-329.
[14] 程淮,籍孝诚.要重视中国0~3岁儿童发展与早期教育[J].中国儿童保健杂志,2001,9(1):1-2.