Development and application of a Social-Emotional and Communicative Assessment Scale for preschool children in China

WANG Jingtao, WU Qian, WEI Wenfei, DONG Kena, WANG Lin, LIU Ling, ZHU Zhongliang, LU Yushan, LI Hui

Chinese Journal of Child Health Care ›› 2024, Vol. 32 ›› Issue (7) : 732-738.

PDF(728 KB)
PDF(728 KB)
Chinese Journal of Child Health Care ›› 2024, Vol. 32 ›› Issue (7) : 732-738. DOI: 10.11852/zgetbjzz2023-0923
Original Articles

Development and application of a Social-Emotional and Communicative Assessment Scale for preschool children in China

  • WANG Jingtao1,2, WU Qian3, WEI Wenfei1, DONG Kena1, WANG Lin1, LIU Ling4, ZHU Zhongliang5,6, LU Yushan6, LI Hui1,3
Author information +
History +

Abstract

Objective To develop the Chinese Preschool Children Social Emotional and Communication Development Assessment Scale (CSECA), and to test its reliability and validity, in order to provide an objective standard for early intervention in clinical child care and mental health. Methods The scale development followed internationally recognized procedures and sampled 2 009 children aged 3 - 6 from Xi'an, Foshan, Jiujiang, and Tianshui using convenience sampling from December 2021 to December 2022. Then initial items were generated through interviews, and factor analysis was utilized for item screening and validity testing. Criterion-related validity was assessed through using the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ) as a criterion measure. Results 1) The scale included five dimensions: sense of control, autonomy, emotional management, social skills, and emotional responsiveness, then the scale was divided into four subscales with 22, 24, 26, and 29 items, respectively. All subscales demonstrated good content validity, structural validity, and criterion validity, with cumulative variance contributions ranging from 57.80% to 66.58%. 2) The overall Cronbach′s α coefficients for the subscales ranged from 0.81 to 0.90, with individual dimension coefficients being 0.71 - 0.90. Criterion-related validity of CSECA varied from 0.573 to 0.849. Test-retest reliability for total scores of subscales was 0.78 - 0.89, and 0.51 - 0.58 for dimensions. 3) Scoring standards were categorized into four levels based on percentile ranges: <P10, P10 - P50, P50 - P90, and >P90, which were classified as low, general, good, and excellent level, respectively. 4) The positive rates of early warning signs for social emotional and communication skills were 9.38% for 3-year-old children, 29.44% for 4-year-old children, 11.80% for 5-year-old children, and 8.23% for 6-year-old children, with 4-year-old children displaying a notably higher detection rate in social emotions compared to other age groups. Conclusion The CSECA scale is successfully established and initially applied in clinical settings, which demonstrated a stable factor structure and good reliability and validity.

Key words

preschool children / social emotional and communication skills / scale / reliability and validity

Cite this article

Download Citations
WANG Jingtao, WU Qian, WEI Wenfei, DONG Kena, WANG Lin, LIU Ling, ZHU Zhongliang, LU Yushan, LI Hui. Development and application of a Social-Emotional and Communicative Assessment Scale for preschool children in China[J]. Chinese Journal of Child Health Care. 2024, 32(7): 732-738 https://doi.org/10.11852/zgetbjzz2023-0923

References

[1] Fallucco EM, Blackmore ER, Bejarano CM, et al. Feasibility of screening for preschool behavioral and emotional problems in primary care using the early childhood screening assessment[J].Clin Pediatr (Phila), 2017, 56(1): 37-45.
[2] Elsayed MN,Vogel CA, Luby LJ,et al. Labelling emotional stimuli in early childhood predicts neural and behavioral indicators of emotion regulation in late adolescence[J]. Biol Psychiatry Cog Neurosci Neuroimaging,2020,6(1):89-98.
[3] 赵蓓.儿童情绪社会性发展问题的研究进展[J].中国儿童保健杂志,2011,19(12):1107-1109,1156.
Zhao B. Research progress on Children's emotional-socialdevelopment[J]. Chin J Child Health Care,2011,19(12):1107-1109,1156.(in Chinese)
[4] 郝篆香,蔡敏.情绪词汇课程:美国提高中小学生情绪素养的有效途径[J].比较教育研究,2013,35(5):85-90.
Hao ZX,Cai M. Emotional vocabulary curriculum: An effective way to improve emotional literacy among elementary and middle school students in the United States[J]. Comparative Education Research,2013,35(5):85-90. (in Chinese)
[5] Choi HJ, Gwag MH. The influence of Children's emotional control skills and social competence on adaptation to early childhood education institutes: With emphasis on gender and age difference[J]. Journal of Korea Open Association for Early Childhood Education,2017,22(3). Doi:10.20437/KOAECE22-3-07
[6] 江澜.《婴儿社会性反应问卷》的编制、信效度评价及其影响因素分析[D]. 合肥:安徽医科大学,2014.
Jiang L. Development, reliability and validity evaluation of the Infant Social Response Questionnaire and analysis of its influencing factors [D].Hehei:Anhui Medical University,2014. (in Chinese)
[7] 陈学诗,郑毅,吴桂英,等.幼儿人格评定量表的编制及其信效度研究[J]. 中国临床心理学杂志,2001,9(1):13-16.
Chen XS, Zheng Y, Wu GY, et al. A study on the development of a personality rating scale for young children and its reliability[J]. Chin J Clin Psych,2001,9(1):13-16. (in Chinese)
[8] 王惠珊,张建端,石淑华,等.中国城市幼儿情绪及社会性发展量表标准化的信度和效度分析[J].中国儿童保健杂志,2009,17(3):271-274.
WangHS,Zhang JR,Shi SH, et al. Reliability and validity analyses of standardized emotional and social development scales for young children in urban China[J]. Chin J Child Health Care, 2009,17(3):271-274. (in Chinese)
[9] Mantz LS , Bear GG , Yang C , et al. The Delaware Social-Emotional Competency Scale (DSECS-S): Evidence of validity and reliability[J]. Child Ind Res, 2018, 11(1). DOI:10.1007/s12187-016-9427-6.
[10] Hinton T, Dowdy E, Furlong MJ, et al. Examining the social emotional health survey-secondary for use with Latinx youth[J]. J Psychoeduc Assess, 2021, 39(2), 242-246.
[11] Goodman R. The Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire: A research note[J].J Child Psychol Psychiatry,1997,38(5):581-586.
[12] Lowe JR, Erickson SJ,Ron S, et al.Comparison of the Bayley Ⅱ Mental Developmental Index and the Bayley Ⅲ Cognitive Scale: Are we measuring the same thing[J]. Acta Paediatrica, 2012, 101( 2): e55-e58.
[13] 谢小庆.用于成长评估的学生成长百分等级模型:来自美国的经验[J].教育测量与评价,2019,12(6):3-9.
Xie XQ. A student growth percentile rank model for growth assessment: Experiences from the United States[J]. Educational Measurement and Evaluation, 2019, 12(6):3-9.(in Chinese)
[14] 寇建华,杜亚松,夏黎明.长处和困难问卷(学生版)上海常模的制订[J].中国健康心理学杂志,2007,15(1):3-5.
Kou JH, Du YS, Xia LM. Development of the Shanghai norm of the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (student version)[J]. Chinese Journal of Health Psychology,2007,15(1):3-5. (in Chinese)
[15] 邓延峰,季建林,范建红,等.上海市23325名学龄前儿童行为、情绪问题调查分析[J].中国社区医师,2019,35(11):159-160,163.
Deng YF, Ji JL, Fan JH, et al. Investigation and analysis of behavioral and emotional problems in 23,325 preschool children in Shanghai[J]. China Community Physician, 2019,35(11):159-160,163.(in Chinese)
[16] Aylward GP. Developmental screening and assessment: What are we thinking[J]. J Dev Behav Pediatr, 2009, 30(2):169-173.
[17] Gerdemann SC, McAuliffe K, Blake PR, et al. The ontogeny of Children's social emotions in response to (un)fairness[J].R Soc Open Sci, 2022, 9(8): 191456.
[18] Mclaughlin KA, Breslau J, Green JG, et al. Childhood socio - economic status and the onset,persistence,and severity of DSM- IV mental disorders in a US National sample[J]. Soc Sci Med, 2011,73(7): 1088-1096.
[19] 马天宇,杜亚松,程永琛,等.学前儿童情绪检核量表(教师卷)的信效度检验及上海常模[J].中国健康心理学杂志,2022,30(10):1519-1524.
Ma TY, Du YS, Cheng YC, et al. Reliability test and Shanghai norms of the Preschool Children's Emotional Checklist (Teacher Scale)[J]. Chinese Journal of Health Psychology, 2022, 30(10):1519-1524.(in Chinese)
PDF(728 KB)

Accesses

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/