Objective To study the early intervention effect of Peabody Developmental Motor Scales 2 (PDMS-2) and the motor activities program in children with motor development retardation, so as to provide scientific reference for the early intervention of motor development retardation.Methods From June 2019 to June 2020, a total of 101 children diagnosed with motor development retardation who met the inclusion and exclusion criteria were selected into this study, and were divided into the intervention group (n=51) and control group (n=50) according to different training methods. Both groups received routine early intervention training. Children in the observation group received motor activities program additionally based on the evaluation results of PDMS-2. After a course of treatment, PDMS-2 was used to evaluate the motor function of children in two groups, and the PDMS-2 evaluation results before and after intervention were compared between the two groups.Results Before intervention, there were no significant differences in gross motor quotient (GMQ), fine motor quotient (FMQ) and total motor quotient (TMQ) between the intervention group and control group (P>0.05). GMQ, FMQ and TMQ of the intervention group were significantly improved after intervention(t=4.00, 3.17, 3.97, P＜0.01), which were also significantly higher than those in the control group after intervention (t=2.13, 2.04, 2.44, P<0.05). Before intervention, the proportion of children with fine or gross movement deviation was significantly different between groups (χ2=2.60, P<0.05).Which was significant difference before and after intervention in the intervention group(χ2=7.71,P<0.01), but which was not significantly different before and afterinterventionin the control group(χ2=3.73,P>0.05). Conclusion PDMS-2 and the motor activities program in the early intervention training can effectively improve the development of motor function of children with motor development retardation
Key words
motor development retardation /
motor activities program /
Peabody Developmental Motor Scales 2 /
early intervention /
children
{{custom_sec.title}}
{{custom_sec.title}}
{{custom_sec.content}}
References
[1] 励建安.特殊儿童物理治疗[M].南京:南京师范大学出版社,2015:291.
[2] 何慧.儿童发育迟缓的进展研究[J].健康前沿,2016,9:204-205.
[3] 陈彬.儿童精神运动发育迟缓50例临床分析[J].中国实用神经疾病杂志,2011,14(16):51-52.
[4] 陈彩云,王琦.群体康复训练对运动发育迟缓婴幼儿粗大运动功能的影响[J].中国保健营养,2016,26(1):407.
[5] Oberklaid F,Efron D. Developmental delay-identification and management[J]. Aust Fam Physician,2005,34(9):739-742.
[6] 刘振寰,戴淑凤.儿童运动发育迟缓康复训练图谱[M].北京:北京大学医学出版社,2007:1.
[7] Harris SR. Early identification of motor delay:Family-centred screening tool[J]. Can Fam Physician,2016,62(8):629-632.
[8] 刘玉凤.早产儿头颅CT配套干预方案对运动发育预后的影响[J].临床和实验医学杂志,2016,15(10):1025-1027.
[9] 周文萍,余波,陈文华,等.肌内效贴配合运动疗法治疗肌张力低下型脑瘫患儿的临床疗效观察[J].中国康复医学杂志,2014,29(10):938-940.
[10] 李书丽.Bobath康复疗法联合头针滞针法治疗运动发育迟缓患儿的效果观察[J].河南医学研究,2018,27(7):107108.
[11] 曾鹏,于利,钟小萍,等.低频脉冲电刺激疗法在小儿运动发育迟缓治疗中的应用效果分析[J].内科,2017,12(1):88-89.
[12] 周念丽.特殊婴幼儿早期发现和干预的医教结合模式建构[J].教育生物学杂志,2013,1(1):58-61.
[13] 杨珍珍,吴德.早期干预的研究进展[J].安徽医学,2011,32(8):1196-1197.
[14] 王益梅,张惠佳,何金华,等.Peabody运动发育量表-2配套运动训练方案在运动发育落后患儿中的应用[J].中国医师杂志,2013,10(15):1403-1404.
[15] 曾萍芳,李燕娟,张瑞霞.Peabody运动评估方法及配套训练方案在早产儿中的应用[J].齐鲁护理杂志,2017,23(8):105-106.
[16] 王跑球,张惠佳,覃蓉,等.Peabody运动发育量表-2与Gesell发育量表在脑性瘫痪患儿中的平行效度研究[J].中华物理医学与康复杂志,2009,31(7):452-455.
[17] Barbara HC, McClune NO, RobertaG. Concurrent validity of the Bayley-Ⅲ and the Peabody Developmental Motor Scale-2[J]. Pediatric Physical Therapy,2012,24(4):345-352.
[18] Gill K, Osiovich A, Synnes A, et al. Concurrent validity of the Bayley-Ⅲ and the Peabody Developmental Motor Scales-2 at 18 months[J]. Physical & Occupational Therapy In Pediatrics, 2019,39(5):514-524.
PDF(524 KB)
