Objective To investigate the correlation between video electroencephalogram (VEEG) and Gesell Developmental Scale (GDS) in neonates with convulsion, in order to provide theoretical reference for predicting the prognosis of neonates with convulsion. Methods From July 2015 to August 2019, newborns who were hospitalized with neonatal convulsion and underwent VEEG examination in Yulin Second Hospital were collected as study subjects.VEEG characteristics in the neonatal period was analyzed, GDS test was performed 3 months after birth. Results 1) A total of 43 eligible newborns were included, including 20 cases of mild VEEG abnormality, 10 cases of moderate abnormality and 13 cases of severe abnormality.2) Mild VEEG abnormalities were mainly paroxysmal abnormalities (50%), and the moderate abnormality was mainly paroxysmal abnormality (40.0%) and mature abnormality (30%).Background activity (61.5%) was the main abnormal condition.3) A total of 38 children were followed up, including 6 lost in follow-up.The results of GDS test showed that the prognosis of 15 patients was poor(DQ<85), with the poor prognosis rate of 40.5%(15/37).4) The prognosis rate of mild, moderate and severe VEEG patients was about 11.1%, 60.0% and 77.8%, respectively.The consistency test of Kappa between the degree of VEEG abnormality and GDS was 0.60.The sensitivity and specificity of predicting the degree of VEEG abnormality were 86.7%, 72.7%, positive predictive value of 68.4% and negative predictive value of 88.9%. Conclusions The predictive value of VEEG and GDS test in neonatal convulsions is not completely consistent.VEEG has high sensitivity and negative predictive value in predicting prognosis, but low specificity and positive predictive value.Clinically, it often takes a long time for comprehensive evaluation to make a more accurate judgment on the neurodevelopment of children with seizures.
Key words
convulsion /
video electroencephalogram /
neonates /
Gesell Developmental Scale
{{custom_sec.title}}
{{custom_sec.title}}
{{custom_sec.content}}
References
[1] Shellhaas RA.Continuous long-term electroencephalography:The gold standard for neonatal seizure diagnosis[J].Semin Fetal Neonatal Med,2018,20:149-153.
[2] 陈宇,唐慧雯.新生儿脑电图及其在新生儿惊厥诊断中的价值[J].临床儿科杂志,2018,26(3):250-253.
[3] 宋彩虹,姜毅,侯新琳,等.新生儿惊厥视频脑电图特点及对预后判断价值[J].中国妇幼健康研究,2017,28(8):564-567.
[4] 马思敏,杨琳,周文浩.新生儿惊厥诊断和治疗进展[J].中国循证儿科杂志,2015,10(2):126-135.
[5] 熊晖,吴希如.新生儿惊厥诊治进展[J].中华围产医学杂志,2014,17(5):298-301.
[6] 刘晓燕.新生儿脑电图及其在评价脑损伤中的应用[J].中国实用儿科杂志,2016,2l(3):229-230.
[7] Le-Bihannic A,Beau vais K,Busnel A,et al.Prognostic value of EEG in very premature newborns[J].Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed,2019,97(2):106-109.
[8] Kang SK,Kadam SD.Neonatal seizures: Impact on neurodevelopmental outcomes[J].Front Pediatr, 2015,3:101.
[9] Lai YH, Ho CS, Chiu NC, et al.Prognostic factors of developmental outcome in neonatal seizures in term infants[J].Pediatr Neonatol, 2013,54(3):166-172.
[10] Glass HC,Shellhaas RA, Wusthoff CJ, et al.Contemporary profile of seizures in neonates:A prospective cohort study[J].J Pediatr, 2016,174:98-103.
[11] Fauser S, Essang C, Altenmüller DM, et al.Long-term seizure outcome in 211 patients with focal cortical dysplasia[J].Epilepsia, 2015,56(1):66-76.
[12] Uria-Avellanal C, Marlow N, Rennie JM.Outcome following neonatal seizures[J].Semin Fetal Neonatal Med, 2013,18(4):224-32.
[13] Payne ET, Zhao XY,Frndova H, et al.Seizure burden is independently associated with short term outcome in critically ill children[J].Brain, 2014,137(Pt5):1429-1438.
[14] Pisani F, Facini C, Pavlidis E, et al.Epilepsy after neonatal seizures: literature review[J].Eur J Paediatr Neurol, 2015,19(1):6-14.
[15] Altunbaşak S, Incecik F, Hergüner O, et al.Prognosis of patients with seizures occurring in the first 2 years[J].J Child Neurol, 2007,22(3):307-313.
[16] 宋战义,李沁晏,廉荣镇,等.视频脑电图与全身运动质量评估在新生儿缺血缺氧性脑病神经发育结局中的预测价值[J].南学院学报(医学版),2017,19(1):1-4.