Analysis of the safety monitoring of national immunization program vaccines for children in Anshan City during 2015-2018

ZHONG Wei-wei, ZHANG Lu

Chinese Journal of Child Health Care ›› 2020, Vol. 28 ›› Issue (8) : 936-938.

PDF(702 KB)
PDF(702 KB)
Chinese Journal of Child Health Care ›› 2020, Vol. 28 ›› Issue (8) : 936-938. DOI: 10.11852/zgetbjzz2020-0238

Analysis of the safety monitoring of national immunization program vaccines for children in Anshan City during 2015-2018

  • ZHONG Wei-wei, ZHANG Lu
Author information +
History +

Abstract

Objective To analyze the characteristics of suspected adverse event following immunization (AEFI) in Anshan City during 2015-2018, so as to evaluate the safety of national immunization program vaccines. Methods The AEFI case data of Anshan City during 2015-2018, collected by the AEFI information management system were analyzed by descriptive epidemiological method. Results A total of 863 AEFI cases caused by immunization program vaccines for children were reported in Anshan during 2015-2018, with 199 cases in 2015, 231 cases in 2016, 170 cases in 2017 and 263 cases in 2018.The overall reported incidence was 42.53/105.Among all the reported cases, 796(92.24%) cases were common adverse reactions, 39(4.52%) cases were rare adverse reactions, 26(3.01%) cases were coincidental events, and 1(0.12%) case was psychogenic reaction, 1(0.12%) case was undetermined.A total of 649(75.20%) cases occurred among children under one year old.The vaccine with the highest reported number and incidence of AEFI was the DTaP vaccine, reported by 336 cases (93.19/105). Conclusion AEFI monitoring in Anshan is of high sensitivity, and national immunization program vaccines for children are highly safe.

Key words

suspected adverse events following immunization / national immunization program vaccine / monitoring

Cite this article

Download Citations
ZHONG Wei-wei, ZHANG Lu. Analysis of the safety monitoring of national immunization program vaccines for children in Anshan City during 2015-2018[J]. Chinese Journal of Child Health Care. 2020, 28(8): 936-938 https://doi.org/10.11852/zgetbjzz2020-0238

References

[1] Dub E, Laberge C, Guay M, et al.Vaccine hestitancy[J].Hum Vacc Immunother, 2013, 9(8):1763-1773.
[2] 陈艳军, 徐绍和, 曲帅征, 等.鞍山市2009~2013年疑似预防接种异常反应监测分析[J].中国公共卫生, 2015, 31(2):252-254.
[3] 全国疑似预防接种异常反应监测方案[J].中国疫苗和免疫, 2011, 17(1):72-81.
[4] 许涤沙, 李克莉, 武文娣, 等.中国2016年疑似预防接种异常反应监测数据分析[J].中国疫苗和免疫, 2018, 24(3):299-309, 322.
[5] 唐文钊, 朱秀兰, 王莹.2011~2018年惠州市疑似预防接种异常反应监测数据分析[J].公共卫生与预防医学, 2019, 30(2):112-115.
[6] 叶家楷, 李克莉, 许涤沙, 等.中国2015年疑似预防接种异常反应监测分析[J].中国疫苗和免疫, 2017, 23(5):481-492, 511.
[7] 韩一楠, 杨月, 林茜.大连市2011~2016年疑似预防接种异常反应监测分析[J].中国生物制品学杂志, 2018, 31(2):170-176.
[8] 邱德山, 刘海田, 王怡.2013-2016年潍坊市疑似预防接种异常反应监测分析[J].现代预防医学, 2017, 44(19):3631-3635.
[9] 刘玉霞, 刘玉琳.不同剂次百白破疫苗接种后发生疑似预防接种反应的分析[J].河北医药, 2015, 37(23):3631-3632.
[10] 陈敏, 梁亚琼, 徐鹭, 等.2013~2016年南京市疑似预防接种异常反应监测分析[J].现代预防医学, 2017, 44(23):4284-4288.
[11] 高波, 孙灵英, 袁月荣, 等.浙江省宁波市江东区2010~2015年疑似预防接种异常反应监测分析[J].中国疫苗和免疫, 2017, 23(3):322-326.
[12] 陈翔, 樊芸, 刘鹏, 等.2017-2018年成都市龙泉驿区疑似预防接种异常反应监测分析[J].预防医学情报杂志, 2020, 36(2):234-239.
[13] 谢广钟, 刁连东, 王树巧, 等.预防接种的反应和处理[M].3版.上海:上海科学技术出版社, 2009:431-459.
[14] Shorvon S, Berg A.Pertussis vaccination and epilepsy - an erratic history, new research and the mismatch between science and social policy[J].Epilepsia, 2008, 49(2):219-225
[15] 张梦娜, 邹丽萍.儿童癫痫与接种常规疫苗异常反应研究进展[J].中华实用儿科临床杂志, 2017, 32(8):634-636.
PDF(702 KB)

Accesses

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/