Physical and psychomotor development of children conceived by assisted reproductive technology

ZHANG Lin, ZHANG Yuan, ZHANG Dan, LI Jing, QIN Zhen-ying,
SONG Jia, XIA Xin-ru, GAO Li, CUI Yu-gui, HU You-fang, LIU Jia-yin

Chinese Journal of Child Health Care ›› 2019, Vol. 27 ›› Issue (8) : 816-819.

PDF(579 KB)
PDF(579 KB)
Chinese Journal of Child Health Care ›› 2019, Vol. 27 ›› Issue (8) : 816-819. DOI: 10.11852/zgetbjzz2018-1267

Physical and psychomotor development of children conceived by assisted reproductive technology

  • ZHANG Lin1, ZHANG Yuan2, ZHANG Dan1, LI Jing1, QIN Zhen-ying1,
    SONG Jia1, XIA Xin-ru2, GAO Li2, CUI Yu-gui2, HU You-fang1, LIU Jia-yin2
Author information +
History +

Abstract

Objective To study the long-term status of physical and psychomotor development in children born after assisted reproductive technology(ART),in order to evaluate the safety of ART.Methods Totally 210 children aged 6 months to 6 years,who were born after ART in Reproductive Center of Jiangsu People′s Hospital from January 2010 to June 2015,were enrolled as ART group,and 139 children matched with general characteristics were selected as control group.The psychomotor development of participants were assessed with Chinese Wechsler Preschool and Primary Scale of Intelligence(C-WPPSI) (for children under 4 years old) and Gesell Developmental Diagnosis Scale (GESELL) ( for children over 4 years old). Results Totally 349 children participated in this study,of which 225 were assessed with GESELL test and 124 were tested with C-WPPSI.In addition to the parents′ age (father 33.21±4.46 vs.31.16±3.52,t=2.99;mother 31.65±5.21 vs.29.55±4.07,t=3.93),the proportion of twins (20.0% vs.7.3%,χ2=7.24) and the cesarean section rate (80.4% vs.57.6%,χ2=11.31) of ART group were significantly higher than those of normal control group (P<0.01).However,there were no significant differences on Z scores of height,weight and body mass index (BMI) between ART group and normal control group (P>0.05).The long-term physical and psychomotor development of the offspring by ART group were not statistically significant compared with that in NC group (P>0.05). Conclusion The offspring born after ART and normal delivery have no significant differences on physical and psychomotor development when followed up to 6 years old,indicating ART is relatively safe on physical and psychomotor development.

Key words

assisted reproductive technology / physical development / psychomotor development / children

Cite this article

Download Citations
ZHANG Lin, ZHANG Yuan, ZHANG Dan, LI Jing, QIN Zhen-ying,
SONG Jia, XIA Xin-ru, GAO Li, CUI Yu-gui, HU You-fang, LIU Jia-yin.
Physical and psychomotor development of children conceived by assisted reproductive technology[J]. Chinese Journal of Child Health Care. 2019, 27(8): 816-819 https://doi.org/10.11852/zgetbjzz2018-1267

References

[1] Pandey S,Shetty A,Hamilton M,et al.Obstetric and perinatal outcomes in singleton pregnancies resulting from IVF/ICSI:a systematic review and meta-analysis[J].Hum Reprod Update,2012,18(5):485-503.
[2] Maheshwari A,Raja EA,Bhattacharya S.Obstetric and perinatal outcomes after either fresh or thawed frozen embryo transfer:an analysis of 112,432 singleton pregnancies recorded in the Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority anonymized dataset[J].Fertil Steril,2016,106(7):1703-1708.
[3] Winter C,Acker FV,Bonduelle M,et al.Cognitive and psychomotor development of 5- to 6-year-old singletons born after PGD:a prospective case-controlled matched,study[J].Hum Reprod,2014,29(9):1968-1977.
[4] 陈小琴,张清学,李予,等.266例辅助生殖技术出生1~3岁儿童体格和精神运动发育状况分析[J].国际生殖健康/计划生育杂志,2014,33(2):113-116.
[5] Rimm AA,Katayama AC.Reproductive technologies and the risk of birth defects[J].N Engl J Med,2012,367(9):874-875.
[6] Wennberg AL,Opdahl S,Bergh C,et al.Effect of maternal age on maternal and neonatal outcomes after assisted reproductive technology[J].Fertil Steril,2016,106(5):1142-1149.
[7] Caserta D,Bordi G,Stegagno M,et al.Maternal and perinatal outcomes in spontaneous versus assisted conception twin pregnancies[J].Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol,2014,174:64-69.
[8] 程秀永.辅助生殖技术对子代远期预后的影响[J].国际儿科学杂志,2014,41(1):88-93.
[9] Dhalwani NN,Boulet SL,Kissin DM,et al.Assisted reproductive technology and perinatal outcomes:conventional versus discordant-sibling design[J].Fertil Steril,2016,106(3):710-716.
[10] Leslie GI,Gibson FL,Mcmahon C,et al.Children conceived using ICSI do not have an increased risk of delayed mental development at 5 years of age[J].Hum Reprod,2003,18(10):2067-2072.
[11] Ludwig AK,Katalinic A,Thyen U,et al.Physical health at 5.5 years of age of term-born singletons after intracytoplasmic sperm injection:results of a prospective,controlled,single-blinded study[J].Fertil Steril,2009,91(1):115-124.
[12] Barbuscia A,Mills MC.Cognitive development in children up to age 11 years born after ART-a longitudinal cohort study[J].Hum Reprod,2017,32(7):1482-1488.
[13] Meijerink AM,Ramos L,Janssen AJ,et al.Behavioral,cognitive,and mtor performance and physical development of five-year-old children who were born after intracytoplasmic sperm injection with the use of testicular sperm[J].Fertil Steril,2016,106(7):1673-1682.
[14] 洪琴,池霞,杨蕾,等.卵胞浆内单精子注射子代4岁龄智能发育情况分析[J].中国儿童保健杂志,2016,24(3):235-237.
PDF(579 KB)

Accesses

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/