Calibration and evaluation of accelerometer-defined cut-off points for physical activities with different intensities in children aged 5~6 years

LI Kun,XU Meng-xue,WANG Bo,FENG Chao,ZHANG Shu-yi,YIN Yan,WU Si-pu,DING Mei-qi,ZHU Zong-han,ZHANG Ting,WU Jian-xin,GUAN Hong-yan

Chinese Journal of Child Health Care ›› 2017, Vol. 25 ›› Issue (10) : 989-992.

PDF(707 KB)
PDF(707 KB)
Chinese Journal of Child Health Care ›› 2017, Vol. 25 ›› Issue (10) : 989-992. DOI: 10.11852/zgetbjzz2017-25-10-05

Calibration and evaluation of accelerometer-defined cut-off points for physical activities with different intensities in children aged 5~6 years

  • LI Kun1,XU Meng-xue1,WANG Bo1,FENG Chao1,ZHANG Shu-yi2,YIN Yan2,WU Si-pu1,DING Mei-qi1,ZHU Zong-han3,ZHANG Ting2,WU Jian-xin2,GUAN Hong-yan1
Author information +
History +

Abstract

Objective To establish accelerometer count cutoffs to categorize activity intensity of 5-to 6-year-old children and to evaluate the accelerometer as a measure of children's physical activity in preschool. Methods Sixty children aged 5~6 years completed series of activities (watching cartoons,slow walking,brisk walking,running and free activities) while wearing a accelerometer and an Polar H6 heart rate monitor to measure accelerometer counts and HR separately.Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curve analyses identified count cutoffs for four intensities physical activity.Children's Activity Rating Scale(CARS)was used to verify the classification of four physical activity intensities. Results 1)Sixty children attended the test and finally valid data of 56 children were received;2) The cut-off points of different intensities of physical activity level were 0~116,117~780,781~1 005 and ≥1 006 counts/15s respectively;3) Sensitivities of the intensities were 100.0%,85.4% and 98.2%,respectively.Specificities of the intensities were 100.0%,86.5% and 90.0%,respectively;4) The consistency test for the results of CARS observation method was given(κ=0.71). Conclusion The ActiGraph count cutoffs established and validated in this study can be used to objectively categorize the time that preschool-age children spend in different intensity levels of physical activity.

Key words

physical activity / cut points / accelerometer / children

Cite this article

Download Citations
LI Kun,XU Meng-xue,WANG Bo,FENG Chao,ZHANG Shu-yi,YIN Yan,WU Si-pu,DING Mei-qi,ZHU Zong-han,ZHANG Ting,WU Jian-xin,GUAN Hong-yan. Calibration and evaluation of accelerometer-defined cut-off points for physical activities with different intensities in children aged 5~6 years[J]. Chinese Journal of Child Health Care. 2017, 25(10): 989-992 https://doi.org/10.11852/zgetbjzz2017-25-10-05

References

[1] Australian Government Department of Health.Australia's physical activity and sedentary behaviour guidelines:tips and Ideas for children (0~5 years)[EB/OL].http://www.health.gov.au/internet/main/publishing.nsf/Content/ti-5-12years,2014-01-06.
[2] Lees C,Hopkins J.Effect of aerobic exercise on cognition,academic achievement,and psychosocial function in children:a systematic review of randomized control trials[J].Prev Chronic Dis,2013,10(10):E174.
[3] Caspersen CJ.Physical activity epidemiology:concepts,methods,and applications to exercise science[J].Exerc Sport Sci Rev,1989,17:423-473.
[4] Organization WH.Global recommendations on physical activity for health[M]//Geneva:World Health Organization,2010.
[5] Mathias D.Physical activity level[M]// Staying Healthy From 1 to 100.Springer Berlin Heidelberg,2016.
[6] Hills AP,Mokhtar N,Byrne NM.Assessment of physical activity and energy expenditure:an overview of objective measures[J].Front Nutr,2014,1:5-5.
[7] Martyniuk OJ,Tucker P.An exploration of early childhood education students' knowledge and preparation to facilitate physical activity for preschoolers:a cross,sectional study[J].BMC Public Health,2014,14(1):727.
[8] Puhl J,Greaves K,Hoyt M,et al.Children's Activity Rating Scale (CARS):description and calibration[J].Res Q Exerc Sport,1990,61(1):26-36.
[9] Van Cauwenberghe E,Labarque V,Trost SG,et al.Calibration and comparison of accelerometer cut points in preschool children[J].Int J Pediatr Obes,2011,6 (2-2):e582-589.
[10] Oliver MS,Grant MS,Philip J.Accelerometry to assess preschooler's free,play:issues with count thresholds and epoch durations[J].Meas Phys Educ Exerc Sci,2009,13 (4):10.
[11] Beets MW,Bornstein D,Dowda M,et al.Compliance with national guidelines for physical activity in U.S.preschoolers:measurement and interpretation[J].Pediatrics,2011,127(4):658-664.
[12] UK Department of Health.UK physical activity guidelines[EB/OL].https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/uk,physical,activity,guidelines,2011-07-11.
[13] CSEP.24-hour movement guidelines for children and youth[EB/OL].http://www.csep.ca/en/guidelines/canadian-24-hour-movement-guidelines,2016.
[14] Pate RR,Almeida MJ,Mciver KL,et al.Validation and calibration of an accelerometer in preschool children[J].Obesity (Silver Spring),2006,14(11):2000-2006.
[15] Evenson KR,Catellier DJ,Gill K,et al.Calibration of two objective measures of physical activity for children[J].J Sports Sci,2008,26(14):1557-1565.
[16] Sirard JR,Trost SG,Pfeiffer KA,et al.Calibration and evaluation of an objective measure of physical activity in pre-school children[J].J Phy Act Health,2005,2(3):3.
PDF(707 KB)

Accesses

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/