Objective To explore the effect on integrated group intervention on the physical development and bone mineral density of small for gestational age infants(SGA). Methods During August 2013 to February 2014,67 SGA from high-risk-infant clinic were divided into intervention group and non intervention group according to the parents' will.In the intervention group,33 cases were treated with integrated group intervention,34 cases in non intervention group were treated with conventional high-risk-infant management,and 20 preterm appropriate for gestational age infants health examined during the same period were randomized.At the correct age 12 months,body weight,length,head circumference and bone density were measured. Results Among SGA intervention group,SGA non intervention group and preterm appropriate for gestational age infants group,differences of body weight,length,head circumference and bone density had statistical significances (P<0.05).Body weight,length and head circumference were decreasd of preterm appropriate for gestational age infants group,SGA intervention group and SGA non intervention group.Bone density was decreased of the SGA non intervention group,preterm appropriate for gestational age infants group and SGA intervention group. Conclusions The mode of integrated group intervention can promote the physical development of SGA,especially body weight to catch up quickly.But in the process of catching up,the problem of SGA bone mineral density deficiency should be paid more attention,and the quantitative ultrasound bone mineral density test is worth to recommend.
Key words
small for gestational age /
integrated group intervention /
bone mineral density /
physical development
{{custom_sec.title}}
{{custom_sec.title}}
{{custom_sec.content}}
References
[1] 金汉珍,黄德珉,官希吉.实用新生儿学[M].北京:人民卫生出版社,2003:4.
[2] 王庆红,杨于嘉,魏克伦,等.我国小于胎龄儿现状分析[J].中国实用儿科杂志,2009,24(3):177-180.
[3] Boguszewski MC,Mericq V,Bergada I,et al.Latin American consensus:children born small for gestational age[J].BMC Pediatr,2011,11:66.
[4] Buttazzoni C,Rosengren B,Tveit M,et al.Preterm children born small for gestational age are at risk for low adult bone mass[J].Calcif Tissue Int,2015,15.Pub Med ID:26472429.
[5] 《中华儿科杂志》编辑委员会,中华医学会儿科学分会新生儿学组,中华医学会儿科学分会儿童保健学组.早产/低出生体重儿喂养建议[J].中国儿童保健杂志,2011,19(9):868-870.
[6] 鲍秀兰.0~3岁儿童最佳的人生开端[M].北京:中国妇女出版社,2013:117-190.
[7] Folio MR,Rebecca RF.Peabody运动发育量表(下册)[M].2版.北京:北京大学医学出版社,2006:115-187.
[8] Olsen IE,Groveman SA,Lawson ML,et al.New intrauterine growth curves based on United States data[J].Pediatrics,2010,125(2):e214-224.
[9] 彭咏梅,冯玲英,郭志平,等.低出生体重儿体格生长16年纵向随访研究[J].中国儿童保健杂志,2003,11(1):1-3.
[10] Varella MH,Moss WJ.Early growth patterns are associated with intelligence quotient scores in children born small-for-gestational age[J].Early Hum Dev,2015,91(8):491-497.
[11] Van der Steen M,Lem AJ,van der Kaay DC,et al.Metabolic health in short children born small for gestational age treated with growth hormone and gonadotropin-releasing hormone analog:results of a randomized,dose-response trial[J].J Clin Endocrinol Metab,2015,100(10):3725-3734.
[12] 莫清萍,丘小汕,余慕雪,等.早期营养干预对小于胎龄儿大鼠胰岛β细胞功能和形态的影响[J].新医学,2012,(11):783-787.
[13] 张兰,唐久来.引导式教育早期干预对新生儿缺氧缺血性脑病的疗效观察[J].中华全科医学,2014,12(10):1621-1623.
[14] 袁俊英,朱登纳,孙二亮,等.引导式教育对脑瘫儿童粗大运动功能和Gesell发育测试结果的影响[J].中华物理医学与康复杂志,2014,36(10):761-764.
[15] 张桂香,李婧,吴娇娇,等.南京市2岁以内儿童骨强度状况研究[J].中国儿童保健杂志,2010,18(12):985-987.
PDF(730 KB)
