Comparative study on the value of interleukin 6 and C reactive protein as early diagnosis markers of neonatal infection

LI Zhi-ling,XU Feng,LIU Hong-xia,HU Wen-juan,XIAO Zhi-jun,LI Jun,SHEN Yang,SUN Hua-jun

Chinese Journal of Child Health Care ›› 2015, Vol. 23 ›› Issue (11) : 1204-1206.

PDF(534 KB)
PDF(534 KB)
Chinese Journal of Child Health Care ›› 2015, Vol. 23 ›› Issue (11) : 1204-1206. DOI: 10.11852/zgetbjzz2015-23-11-26

Comparative study on the value of interleukin 6 and C reactive protein as early diagnosis markers of neonatal infection

  • LI Zhi-ling1,XU Feng2,LIU Hong-xia1,HU Wen-juan1,XIAO Zhi-jun2,LI Jun3,SHEN Yang1,SUN Hua-jun1
Author information +
History +

Abstract

Objective To compare the significance of IL-6 and C reactive protein (CRP) in early diagnosis and prognosis of neonatal sepsis,and to timely detect neonates in high-risk of infection. Methods A total of 80 neonatal sepsis patients from January 2009 to December 2012 in NICU who met the criteria were included,and 80 cases of non-sepsis were set as the control group.After admission,blood was collected before use of antibiotics,and then submitted for CRP,IL-6 detection,blood routine examination and blood culture.The CRP and IL-6 were reviewed at 4 h,24 h after the use of antibiotics for patient in the case group and control group. Results 1) There were significant differences (P<0.05) between the sepsis group and the control group for the IL-6 and CRP.After 4 h of the antibiotics usage,IL-6 increased significantly to a peak;whereas CRP peaked at 24 h after the antibiotics usage.2) In premature and full-term neonates group,the diagnosis sensitivity and specificity of IL-6 were significantly higher than CRP after 4 h of the antibiotics usage. Conclusions IL-6 has a high sensitivity and specificity for the early diagnosis of neonatal sepsis.IL-6 monitoring at 4 h after infection is most sensitive,and CRP is most sensitive at 24 h after infection.Abnormally high levels of IL-6 increased early than CRP.

Key words

neonatal septicemia / interleukin 6 / C reactive protein / early diagnosis

Cite this article

Download Citations
LI Zhi-ling,XU Feng,LIU Hong-xia,HU Wen-juan,XIAO Zhi-jun,LI Jun,SHEN Yang,SUN Hua-jun. Comparative study on the value of interleukin 6 and C reactive protein as early diagnosis markers of neonatal infection[J]. Chinese Journal of Child Health Care. 2015, 23(11): 1204-1206 https://doi.org/10.11852/zgetbjzz2015-23-11-26

References

[1] 马勇,覃艳玲,李志.降钙素原(PCT),hs-CRP 在新生儿败血症早期诊断中的价值[J].实用预防医学,2012,19(5):747-749.
[2] 曹秀红,张学彦,张晓娜.白介素在溃疡性结肠炎发病机制中的研究进展[J].世界华人消化杂志,2011,19(30):3143-3148.
[3] Dulay A,Buhimschi I,Zhao G,et al.625:Systematic evaluation of prototype acute phase reactants [Interleukin-6 (IL-6),C-reactive protein (CRP) and procalcitonin (PCT)] as non-invasive biomarkers of intra-amniotic infection (IAI)[J].American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology,2011,204(1supple):248.
[4] 余加林,吴仕孝.新生儿败血症诊疗方案[J].中华儿科杂志.2004,41(12):897-899.
[5] Rocha G,Proena E,Guedes A,et al.Cord blood levels of IL-6,IL-8 and IL-10 may be early predictors of bronchopulmonary dysplasia in preterm newborns small for gestational age[J].Disease Markers,2012,33(1):51-60.
[6] Hatzidaki E,Gourgiotis D,Manoura A,et al.Interleukin‐6 in preterm premature rupture of membranes as an indicator of neonatal outcome[J].Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica,2005,84(7):632-638.
[7] Zhu G,Zhu J,Song L,et al.Combined use of biomarkers for distinguishing between bacterial and viral etiologies in pediatric lower respiratory tract infections[J].Infectious Diseases,2015,47(5):289-293.
[8] Zabrecky KA,Slovis NM,Constable PD,et al.Plasma C-reactive protein and haptoglobin concentrations in critically Ill neonatal foals[J].Journal of Veterinary Internal Medicine,2015,29(2):673-677.
[9] Wu JH,Chen CY,Tsao PN,et al.Neonatal sepsis:a 6-year analysis in a neonatal care unit in Taiwan[J].Pediatrics & Neonatology,2009,50(3):88-95.
PDF(534 KB)

Accesses

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/