Comparison of therapeutic effect for different mode of positive airway pressure in preterm infants with respiratory distress syndrome

YU Fang,GUO Chun-yan

Chinese Journal of Child Health Care ›› 2015, Vol. 23 ›› Issue (11) : 1201-1203.

PDF(377 KB)
PDF(377 KB)
Chinese Journal of Child Health Care ›› 2015, Vol. 23 ›› Issue (11) : 1201-1203. DOI: 10.11852/zgetbjzz2015-23-11-25

Comparison of therapeutic effect for different mode of positive airway pressure in preterm infants with respiratory distress syndrome

  • YU Fang,GUO Chun-yan
Author information +
History +

Abstract

Objective To compare the advantages and disadvantages of two modes as a primary mode of ventilation in premature infants with neonatal respiratory distress syndrome (RDS). Methods From January 2012 to December 2014,80 preterm infants with RDS who received in our hospital were randomly divided into two groups based on the primary mode of ventilation:nasal continuous positive airway pressure(NCPAP,n=40),bi-level positive airway pressure(SiPAP,n=40).The success rate of treatment and the incidence of different complications were compared. Results 1)Significantly,more infants in the SiPAP group remained extubated compared with those in the NCPAP group,whereas the success rate in SiPAP group was higher in NCPAP group(52% vs 26%,P<0.05).2)No significant difference in the complication was found between two groups(P>0.05). Conclusion The effect of nasal SiPAP for preterm infants with RDS appears to have greater advantage than that of NCPAP obviously,and without increasing the incidence of adverse events.

Key words

nasal continuous positive airway pressure / bi-level positive airway pressure / premature / respiratory distress syndrome / newborn

Cite this article

Download Citations
YU Fang,GUO Chun-yan. Comparison of therapeutic effect for different mode of positive airway pressure in preterm infants with respiratory distress syndrome[J]. Chinese Journal of Child Health Care. 2015, 23(11): 1201-1203 https://doi.org/10.11852/zgetbjzz2015-23-11-25

References

[1] Sweet DG,Carnielli V,Greisen G,et al.European consensus guidelines on the management of neonatal respiratory distress syndrome in preterm infants- 2010 update[J].Neonatology,2011,49(1):27-33.
[2] 植荣昌,李寅环,黄春萍,无创正压通气在急性肺损伤/急性呼吸窘迫综合征中的随机对照研究[J].中国呼吸与危重症杂志,2012,11(6):522-527.
[3] 邵肖梅,叶鸿帽,丘小汕.实用新生儿学[M].4版.北京:人民卫生出版社,2011:395-398.
[4] Bancalari E,Claure N.Principles of respiratory monitoring and therapy[M]//Gleason CA,Davaskar SU.Avrey's Diseases of the Newborn,9th ed.Philadelphia:Elsevier Saunders,2012:612-632.
[5] DiBlasi RM.Neonatal noninvasive ventilation techniques :do we really need to intubate?[J].Respir Care,2011,56:1273-1294.
[6] 高翔羽 黑明燕 双水平气道正压通气在早产儿呼吸窘迫综合征中的应用 中华儿科杂志,2013,51(10):756-757.
[7] Victor S.EXTUBATE:a randomised controlled trial of nasal biphasic positive airway pressure vs nasal continuous positive airway pressure following estuation in infants less than 30 weeks' gestation:study protocol for a randomised controlled trial[J].Trials,2011,12:257-264.
PDF(377 KB)

Accesses

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/