Objective To compare the performance on the projective drawing of House-Tree-Person Tests between migrant children and resident children. Methods Synthetic House-Tree-Person Test was adopted to 78 migrant children and 87 resident children,and drawing were rated according to some encoding criteria,then scores on each item and dimension were compared between two groups. Results There were great difference in aggression (t=3.39),inferiority and withdrawal (t=6.23),depression (t=6.86) and anxiety (t=5.50) between the two groups (P all<0.01).The relationships between all the psychological dimensions were significant (r=0.28~0.59,P<0.05). Conclusion Migrant children scored higher than resident children on some mental health indicators like aggression,inferiority and withdrawal,depression and anxiety,and some efficient interference should be considered.
Key words
Synthetic House-Tree-Person /
migrant children /
mental health
{{custom_sec.title}}
{{custom_sec.title}}
{{custom_sec.content}}
References
[1] 严虎,陈晋东.农村留守儿童与非留守儿童房树人测验结果比较[J].中国临床心理学杂志,2013,21(3):417-419.
[2] Buck JN.The House-Tree-Person technique revised manual[M].VC.W.P.Services,1977.
[3] 蔺秀云,方晓义,刘杨,等.流动儿童歧视知觉与心理健康水平的关系及其心理机制[J].心理学报,2009,41(10):967-979.
[4] 张同延,张函诗.揭开你人格的秘密:房、树、人绘图心理测验[M].北京:中国文联出版公司,2007:25-297.
[5] 童辉杰.投射技术-对适合中国人文化的心理测评技术的探索[M].哈尔滨:黑龙江人民出版社,2004:19-75.
[6] 陈侃.绘画心理测验与心理分析[M].广州:广东高教出版社,2008:69-95.
[7] 李洪伟,吴迪.心理画:绘画心理分析图典[M].长沙:湖南人民出版社,2010:73-141.
[8] 王萍萍,许燕,王其峰.汶川地震灾区与非灾区儿童动态房树人测验结果比较[J].中国临床心理学杂志,2010,18(6):720-722.
[9] 陈侃.焦虑症状的绘画评定研究[J].心理科学,2011,34(6):1512-1515.
[10] 张迪,白春玉,牟均,等.流动儿童心理健康状况与自尊关系的研究[J].中国儿童保健杂志,2013,21(3):300-302.
[11] 李晓巍,邹泓,金灿灿,等.流动儿童的问题行为与人格、家庭功能的关系[J].心理发展与教育,2008,24(2):54-59.
[12] 袁晓娇,方晓义,刘 杨,等.流动儿童压力应对方式与抑郁感、社交焦虑的关系:一项追踪研究[J].心理发展与教育,2012,28(3):283-291.