The revision and according validity research of 〈China Developmental Scale for Children〉.

JIN Chun-hua,LI Rui-li,ZHANG Li-li,ZHANG Yue,LI Na,WANG Jian-hong,WANG Xiao-yan,LIANG Wei-lian,ZHANG Yi-xun,WEI Zhuang,ZHANG Feng,LIANG Ai-min,ZHAO Lu,BAO Ling,KONG Ya-nan,CHEN Bo-wen.

Chinese Journal of Child Health Care ›› 2014, Vol. 22 ›› Issue (12) : 1242-1246.

PDF(701 KB)
PDF(701 KB)
Chinese Journal of Child Health Care ›› 2014, Vol. 22 ›› Issue (12) : 1242-1246. DOI: 10.11852/zgetbjzz2014-22-12-04

The revision and according validity research of 〈China Developmental Scale for Children〉.

  • JIN Chun-hua1,LI Rui-li2,ZHANG Li-li1,ZHANG Yue1,LI Na1,WANG Jian-hong1,WANG Xiao-yan1,LIANG Wei-lian3,ZHANG Yi-xun4,WEI Zhuang5,ZHANG Feng5,LIANG Ai-min6,ZHAO Lu7,BAO Ling8,KONG Ya-nan9,CHEN Bo-wen2.
Author information +
History +

Abstract

Objective To study the construct validity and effective validity of the revised 〈China Developmental Scale for Children〉 and provide support for national norm and diagnostic development scale. Methods The revised 〈China Developmental Scale for Children〉 was used among sampled Beijing population.Item analyse,exploratory factor analysis,confirmatory factor analysis and structural equation modelling analysis were used to determine the scale structure and structure effectiveness.Gesell Development Scale was performed to external effective validity analyse. Results Among 2 779 from 0 to 84 months old children,1 648 were boy and 1 311 were girl.77 329 tests were performed.99.2% (259/261) of the test items had discriminability (critical ratio,P<0.05).Regroup the samples for every three months age.9 subsets KMO were 0.938,0.954,0.933,0.932,0.940,0.942,0.948,0.976,0.956;5 dimension of the scale and extract factor loading analyze generally matched.After performing compulsory testing verify analyses for 9 subsets,idea of five dimension and actual data were fitted well.Considering the characteristic of development scale and the sample request of verify factor analyses,adjacent month aging was regrouped and verify analyses,the analyses parameter CFI and NNFI were both greater than 0.9,79.2% (19/24) of the sample had RMSEA lower than 0.08,the highest value was 0.98 which still matched the five dimension idea.The Pearson factor between Gasell scale was 0.637. Conclusion The revised 〈China Developmental Scale for Children〉 has good structure effectiveness and discrimination.Five dimension structure is reasonable and matches the diagnose development scale parameters.The result can be adapted as the foundation of national norm scale.

Key words

child / development / scale / construct validity / factor analysis / confirmatory factor analysis

Cite this article

Download Citations
JIN Chun-hua,LI Rui-li,ZHANG Li-li,ZHANG Yue,LI Na,WANG Jian-hong,WANG Xiao-yan,LIANG Wei-lian,ZHANG Yi-xun,WEI Zhuang,ZHANG Feng,LIANG Ai-min,ZHAO Lu,BAO Ling,KONG Ya-nan,CHEN Bo-wen.. The revision and according validity research of 〈China Developmental Scale for Children〉.[J]. Chinese Journal of Child Health Care. 2014, 22(12): 1242-1246 https://doi.org/10.11852/zgetbjzz2014-22-12-04

References

[1] J.J.F.ter拉克.心理诊断[M].陈会昌,译.北京:华文出版社,2000,2:103-118.235-247.
[2] 罗伯特.F.德威利斯.量表编制:理论与应用[M].2版,重庆:重庆大学出版,2010,4:89-139,125.
[3] 张秀玲,李寄平,秦明镜,等.Gesell发展诊断量表3~6岁北京修订本的制定[J],中国临床心理学杂志,1994,2(3):148-150.
[4] 王重鸣.心理学研究方法 [M].2版,北京:人民教育出版社,2001:287-297.
[5] 侯杰泰,温忠麟,成子娟.结构方程模型及其应用 [M].北京:教育出版社,2004:157.
[6] 花静,吴擢春,古桂雄,等.城区学龄前儿童运动发育家庭环境量表的信度和效度评价 [J].中华流行病学杂志,2012,33(5):464-469.
[7] 孙晓勉,任永惠,苏祖佑,等.Bayley婴幼儿发育量表的研究[J].中国妇幼保健,1996,11(1):51-53.
[8] 徐姗姗,黄红,张劲松.婴幼儿诊断性发育量表研究及应用进展[J].中国儿童保健杂志,2010,18(11):859-861.
[9] 易受蓉,罗学荣,杨志伟,等.贝利婴幼儿发展量表在我国的修订(城市版)[J].中国临床心理学杂志,1993,1(2):71-75.
[10] 江帆.儿童早期发展-新时期儿童保健工作的挑战 [J].中国儿童保健杂志,2014,22(3):1327-1329.
PDF(701 KB)

Accesses

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/