目的 研究新生儿呼吸衰竭的病因及发病因素,探讨肺表面活性物质(pulmonary surfactant,PS)联合辅助通气在新生儿呼吸衰竭中的治疗效果。 【方法 】 回顾性分析2010年7月-2011年7月遵义市第一人民医院新生儿科收治的121例新生儿呼吸衰竭患儿的病例资料,所有病例均给予呼吸支持为主的综合治疗,联合应用肺表面活性物质的49例为试验组,同期单用辅助通气治疗的72例为对照组,比较两组患儿的辅助通气持续时间、总氧疗时间、治愈率、死亡率及并发症发生率。 结果 试验组的治愈率(89.8%)高于对照组(69.4%),死亡率低于对照组(χ2=7.16,P<0.05);试验组的辅助通气持续时间及总氧疗时间明显低于对照组(U=20.979和12.997,P均<0.01);两组的并发症发生率差异无统计学意义(P均>0.05)。 结论 肺表面活性物质联合辅助通气为主的综合治疗可明显提高呼吸衰竭患儿的治愈率,同时不增加并发症的发生率。
Abstract
Objective To discuss the cause of disease and the correlation factor for neonatal respiratory failure,and evaluate the clinical effect of (pulmonary surfactant,PS) and subsidiary ventilation for the treatment of neonatal respiratory failure. Methods By retrospective analysis the clinical data of 121 neonatal with respiratory failure were received the systemic treatment of subsidiary ventilation at department of neonatology in the First People's Hospital in Zunyi from July 2010 to July 2011.49 infants who received PS treatment were set as in test group,another 72 neonates who only received subsidiary ventilation were set as control group.The ventilation duration,the total oxygen-inhale time,cure rate,mortality and the clinical outcomes were compared between two groups. Results Cure rate in the test group ( 89.8%) was obviously higher than that in the control group(69.4%);while the mortality rate was lower than that of the control group(χ2=7.16,P<0.05);The ventilation duration and total oxygen-inhale time in test group were lower compared with control group(U=20.979 and 12.997,P<0.01);There was no significant difference in the complications between two groups(P>0.05). Conclusion The combined treatment of PS and subsidiary ventilation can obviously improve the cure rate but not increase the incidence of complications.
关键词
呼吸衰竭 /
婴儿 /
新生 /
肺表面活性物质 /
辅助通气
Key words
pulmonary surfactant /
subsidiary ventilation /
respiratory failure /
infant /
newborn
{{custom_sec.title}}
{{custom_sec.title}}
{{custom_sec.content}}
参考文献
[1] 陈平洋.新生儿呼吸衰竭的治疗进展[J].实用儿科临床杂志,2011,26(14):1072-1074.
[2] 邵肖梅,叶鸿瑁,邱小汕.实用新生儿学[M].4版.北京:人民卫生出版社,2011.
[3] Qian LL,Liu CQ,Zhang WZY,et al.Chinese collaborative study group for neonatal respiratory diseases.Neonatal respiratory failure A 12-month clinical epidemiological study in 2004-2005 in china[J].Pediatrics,2008,121(5):1115-1124.
[4] 杨彤,沈琪,黄献文.肺表面活性物质治疗新生儿胎粪吸入综合征的系统评价[J].中国实用儿科杂志,2010,25(3):220-226.
[5] 王薇,孙波.肺表面活性物质与小儿急性肺损伤的临床研究进展[J].中国小儿急救医学,2007,14(2):96-99.
[6] 郏琴,孙建华,杨庆南,等.新生儿重度非透明膜病肺表面活性物质的替代治疗[J].实用儿科临床杂志,2001,16(2):85-86.
[7] 周东元,张建军,王英,等.应用肺表面活性物质治疗新生儿肺透明膜病临床观察[J].中国急救医学,2005,25(5):383-384.
[8] 刘翠青,崔泽,夏耀芳,等.目标容量控制通气治疗新生儿呼吸窘迫综合征的前瞻性随机对照研究[J].中国当代儿科杂志,2011,13(9):696-699.
[9] Kinsella JP.Inhaled nitric oxide therapy in premature newborns[J].Curr Opin Pediatr,2006,18(2):107-111.