北京市顺义区高危儿早期干预综合管理效果分析
- 毛景霞,刘超
作者信息
+
Effect analysis of early intervention comprehensive management on high-risk neonates in Beijing Shunyi districts.
- MAO Jing-xia,LIU Chao.
Author information
+
文章历史
+
摘要
目的 探讨适用于顺义区高危儿早期干预管理模式。方法 规范管理后,根据患儿就诊的方便程度和家长的意愿,将高危儿分为干预管理组和干预对照组,同时在儿童保健门诊随机选取60例常规体检的正常儿童作为正常对照组,1岁时均采用Gesell发育量表测评;规范管理前后比较:高危儿的建档率、6个月和12个月的随访率。结果 除正常对照组与管理组比较,在大运动、精细动作和平均发育商差异无统计学意义外(P>0.05),其余各能区的每组两两比较差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05);规范管理前后比较:高危儿的建档率、6个月和12个月的随访率,差异有统计学意义(P值均<0.05)。 结论 系统的规范管理高危儿,是提高其建档率、随访率和干预效果的重要途径。
Abstract
Objective To investigate suitable management model of early intervention on the high-risk neonates in Shunyi district. Methods According to conveniences of children and hopes of parent,all high-risk neonates were divided into intervention management group and intervention control group,at the same time random selected 60 cases (n=60) of the normal children health examination in department of child health care as normal control group.All the babies were measured using Gesell developmental scale when they were one year old;and compared before and after the standardize management:high-risk creates file rate,follow-up rate in 6 and 12 months old. Results In addition to the normal control group and management group comparison,in the big movement,fine movement and average development quotient,differences were not statistically significant (P>0.05),and the rest comparisons differences of the every two two groups were statistically significant (P<0.05);the comparison before and after the standardize the management:after standard management,high-risk neonates creates file rate,6 months,and 12 months of follow-up rate,the differences were statistically significant (P<0.05). Conclusion System standard management of high-risk is important way to improve its filing rate,follow-up rate and the intervention effect.
关键词
Key words
early intervention / standardized management / high-risk neonates
{{custom_sec.title}}
{{custom_sec.title}}
参考文献
[1] 晁占湖,王有福,张学聪.NBNA评分筛查足月高危儿脑损伤及早期干预的临床应用[J].中国实用神经疾病杂志,2008,11(1):82-84.
[2] 鲍秀兰.重视高危儿的发育风险和早期科学干预对策[J].中国儿童保健杂志,2011,19(6):393-394.
[3] 郭淑娟,夏经炜,曹丽娟,等.高危儿早期干预模式的建立和评估[J].中国儿童保健杂志,2010,18(11):870-873.
[4] 肖建国,郑俊容,李雪川.高危儿188例早期干预效果分析[J].中国儿童保健杂志,2011,19(9):864-865.
[5] 郭淑娟.高危儿0~3岁早期干预的研究进展[J].中国儿童保健杂志,2008,15(5):255.
[6] 宋凤玲,赵冬梅,李玲,等.社区高危儿监测与管理模式的研究[J].中国儿童保健杂志,2012,20(9):862-864.
[2] 鲍秀兰.重视高危儿的发育风险和早期科学干预对策[J].中国儿童保健杂志,2011,19(6):393-394.
[3] 郭淑娟,夏经炜,曹丽娟,等.高危儿早期干预模式的建立和评估[J].中国儿童保健杂志,2010,18(11):870-873.
[4] 肖建国,郑俊容,李雪川.高危儿188例早期干预效果分析[J].中国儿童保健杂志,2011,19(9):864-865.
[5] 郭淑娟.高危儿0~3岁早期干预的研究进展[J].中国儿童保健杂志,2008,15(5):255.
[6] 宋凤玲,赵冬梅,李玲,等.社区高危儿监测与管理模式的研究[J].中国儿童保健杂志,2012,20(9):862-864.
基金
首都医学发展科研基金项目(2009-3251)
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |






