关系质量问卷中文自评版用于儿童师生关系研究的信效度

孔箴,曹枫林,崔乃雪,李阳,陈倩倩,刘佳佳

中国儿童保健杂志 ›› 2012, Vol. 20 ›› Issue (3) : 221-223.

PDF(419 KB)
PDF(419 KB)
中国儿童保健杂志 ›› 2012, Vol. 20 ›› Issue (3) : 221-223.
科研论著

关系质量问卷中文自评版用于儿童师生关系研究的信效度

  • 孔箴,曹枫林,崔乃雪,李阳,陈倩倩,刘佳佳
作者信息 +

Reliability and validity of the Network of Relationship Inventory-Relationship Quality Version in Chinese teacher-student relationship

  • KONG Zhen,CAO Feng-lin,CUI Nai-xue,LI Yang,CHEN Qian-qian,LIU Jia-jia
Author information +
文章历史 +

摘要

【目的】 考察关系质量问卷中文自评版用于儿童师生关系质量评估的信度和效度。 【方法】 采用分层整群抽样方法,从某小学及某中学中各抽取四个班共979名学生,回收有效问卷822份。随机抽取57人用于重测。 【结果】 关系质量问卷用于评估师生关系时的Cronbach α系数为0.84,重测信度为0.77。限定因子个数为2进行主成分分析解释变异量的39.86%。验证性因素分析的拟合指标χ2/df、RMSEA、GFI、AGFI、NNFI、CFI分别为3.42、0.09、0.78、0.74、0.89、0.90。 【结论】 关系质量问卷的信度、效度均良好,符号心理测量学要求,可用于今后国内的有关研究。

Abstract

【Objective】 To assess the reliability and validity of Chinese children version of Network of Relationship Inventory-Relationship Quality Version (NRI-RQV). 【Method】 The original English version was translated into Chinese and administered to 822 children for teacher-student relationship quality assessment. 【Results】 The Cronbach α was 0.84 and the test-retest reliability was 0.77.Limited number of factors to 2,PCA shows the percentage of variance explained 39.86%.Confirmatory factor analysis showed that the fit indexes:χ2/df,RMSEA,GFI,AGFI,NNFI,CFI were 3.42,0.09,0.78,0.74,0.89,0.90. 【Conclusion】 The NRI-RQV is found to have good psychometrics properties, and applicable to assess the quality of Chinese parent-child relationship.

关键词

心理测量学研究 / 师生关系 / 关系质量问卷 / 信度 / 效度

Key words

psychometrics studies / teacher-student relationship / relationship quality version / reliability / validity

引用本文

导出引用
孔箴,曹枫林,崔乃雪,李阳,陈倩倩,刘佳佳. 关系质量问卷中文自评版用于儿童师生关系研究的信效度[J]. 中国儿童保健杂志. 2012, 20(3): 221-223
KONG Zhen,CAO Feng-lin,CUI Nai-xue,LI Yang,CHEN Qian-qian,LIU Jia-jia. Reliability and validity of the Network of Relationship Inventory-Relationship Quality Version in Chinese teacher-student relationship[J]. Chinese Journal of Child Health Care. 2012, 20(3): 221-223
中图分类号: R749.94   

参考文献

[1] 李瑾瑜.关于师生关系本质的认识[J].教育评论,1998,4(1):34-36.
[2] 刘静.20世纪90年代以来我国师生关系研究评述[J].教育探索,2003,7(1):52-54.
[3] Wyndol F,Duane B.Network of relationships questionnaire manual[R].2010.
[4] Wyndol F,Duane B.The network of relationships inventory:behavioral systems version[J].International Journal of Behavioral Development,2009,33(5):470-478.
[5] 吴明隆.SPSS统计应用实务[M].北京:中国铁道出版社,2000.
[6] 侯杰泰.结构方程模型及其应用[M].北京:教育科学出版社,2004.
[7] 方平,熊端琴,蔡红.结构方程在心理学研究中的应用[J].心理科学,2001,24(4):406-408.
[8] 郝元涛,方积乾.结构方程模型及其在医学中的应用研究[J].中国医院统计,2003,10(4):240-244.
[9] 温忠麟,侯杰泰.结构方程模型检验:拟合指数和卡方准则[J].心理学报,2004,36(2):186-194.
[10] Furman W.The measurement of children and adolescents' perceptions of friendships:Conceptual and methodological issues[M].Cambridge University Press,1996.
[11] Adams RE,Laursen B.The correlates of conflict:disagreement is not necessarily detrimental[J].Journal of Family Psychology,2007,21:445-458.
[12] Hafen CA,Laursen B.More problems and less support:early adolescent adjustment forecasts changes in perceived support from parents[J].Journal of Family Psychology,2009,22:193-202.
[13] Hair JR,Anderson RE,Tatham RL,et al.Multivariate data analysis with readings[M].Prentice-Hall,1995.
[14] 王耘,王晓华.小学生的师生关系特点与学生因素的关系研究[J].心理发展与教育,2002,18(3):18-23.

基金

教育部基金(10YJCXLX001);山东省自然基金(ZR2009CM023);山东大学创新基金(2009TS015)

PDF(419 KB)

Accesses

Citation

Detail

段落导航
相关文章

/