儿童家庭玩具配置评估的项目反应理论模型

华晶, 池霞, 宋骏, 芮洪新, 周建勇, 林枫

中国儿童保健杂志 ›› 2025, Vol. 33 ›› Issue (12) : 1303-1309.

PDF(2023 KB)
PDF(2023 KB)
中国儿童保健杂志 ›› 2025, Vol. 33 ›› Issue (12) : 1303-1309. DOI: 10.11852/zgetbjzz2025-0183
科研论著

儿童家庭玩具配置评估的项目反应理论模型

  • 华晶1,2,3, 池霞2,3, 宋骏1,2,3, 芮洪新1,2,3, 周建勇2,3, 林枫1,4
作者信息 +

Item response theory model for the home toy inventory assessment in infants

  • HUA Jing1,2,3, CHI Xia2,3, SONG Jun1,2,3, RUI Hongxin1,2,3, ZHOU Jianyong2,3, LIN Feng1,4
Author information +
文章历史 +

摘要

目的 应用项目反应理论构建儿童家庭玩具配置评估工具,为指导家庭科学配置儿童运动玩具提供量化依据。方法 采用横断面便利抽样,选取2023年1—10月在南京市妇幼保健院儿童保健科健康体检的18~42月龄的婴幼儿及其家长为研究对象。选择儿童运动发育家庭环境支持量表中的玩具维度条目(包括粗大运动和精细运动玩具),通过R软件进行项目反应理论建模,计算个人能力值和拟合优度、条目难度、干预获益度以及信效度分析。结果 样本共包括250例婴幼儿及其家长。摩肯量表分析筛选出23个条目用于构建Rasch模型,所得模型具有良好的拟合优度(M2统计量=377.917,df=252,P>0.05)、信度(潜在类别信度系数=0.898)和效度(r=0.60,P<0.01)。其中22个条目有显著干预获益度(P<0.05)。人项图显示条目难度与个体能力适配度良好,呈现正态分布。结论 家庭玩具配置量表与Rasch模型拟合良好,能有效预测儿童运动相关的家庭玩具支持情况。人项图决策工具有利于指导家长制定与其能力更加匹配的个性化家庭干预方案。

Abstract

Objective To apply item response theory (IRT) to develop a tool for assessing home toy inventory, so as to provide a quantitative basis for guiding families in the scientific arrangement of infants′ physical activity toys. Methods A cross-sectional study was conducted using a convenience sample of infants aged 18 - 42 months and their parents recruited between January and October 2023 from the Department of Child Health Care of Nanjing Women and Children′s Healthcare Hospital. Items from the toy dimension (including gross and fine motor toys) of the Affordances in the Home Environment for Motor Development-Self Report (AHEMD-SR) were selected. IRT modeling was performed using R software to calculate person ability, goodness of fit, item difficulty, and intervention benefit, alongside reliability and validity analysis. Results The sample included 250 infants and their parents. Mokken scale analysis screened 23 items for Rasch model construction. The resulting model demonstrated good fit (M2 statistic=377.917, df=252, P>0.05), high reliability (latent class reliability coefficient=0.898) and good validity (r=0.60, P<0.01). Among these, 22 items showed significant intervention benefit (P<0.05).The person-item map indicated good matching between item difficulty and individual ability, presenting a normal distribution. Conclusions The Home Toy Inventory Assessment, constructed based on IRT, fits well with the Rasch model and can effectively evaluate home toy support related to children′s motor development. The person-item map serves as a decision-making tool to assist parents in developing individualized home intervention plans tailored to their capability levels.

关键词

项目反应理论 / 运动发育 / 玩具 / 家庭环境 / 儿童

Key words

item response theory / motor development / toys / home environment / children

引用本文

导出引用
华晶, 池霞, 宋骏, 芮洪新, 周建勇, 林枫. 儿童家庭玩具配置评估的项目反应理论模型[J]. 中国儿童保健杂志. 2025, 33(12): 1303-1309 https://doi.org/10.11852/zgetbjzz2025-0183
HUA Jing, CHI Xia, SONG Jun, RUI Hongxin, ZHOU Jianyong, LIN Feng. Item response theory model for the home toy inventory assessment in infants[J]. Chinese Journal of Child Health Care. 2025, 33(12): 1303-1309 https://doi.org/10.11852/zgetbjzz2025-0183
中图分类号: R179   

参考文献

[1] Panceri C, Silveira R, Procianoy R, et al. Motor development in the first year of life predicts impairments in cognition and language at 3 years old in a Brazilian preterm cohort of low-income families[J]. Front Neurosci, 2022, 16: 1034616.
[2] Kavousipor S, Rassafiani M, Ebadi A, et al. Cultural adaptation and psychometric properties of the persian version of the affordance in the home environment for motor development[J]. Iran J Child Neurol, 2019, 13(1): 25.
[3] 李佳, 余立平. 家庭养育环境对儿童早期发展影响的研究进展[J]. 中国儿童保健杂志, 2021, 29(10): 1096-1099,1104.
Li J, Yu LP. Research progress on the influence of family nurturing environment on early childhood development[J]. Chin J Child Health Care, 2021,29(10): 1096-1099,1104.(in Chinese)
[4] Barros CS, Vieira MF, Ribeiro CMT. The use of participation assessment and contextual factors for extended analysis of child neurodevelopment[J]. Fisioter Bras, 2023, 24(6): 795-811.
[5] Fiss A, Håkstad R, Looper J, et al. Embedding play to enrich physical therapy[J]. Behav Sci (Basel), 2023, 13(6): 440.
[6] Rodrigues LP, Saraiva L, Gabbard C. Development and construct validation of an inventory for assessing the home environment for motor development[J]. Res Q Exerc Sport, 2005, 76(2): 140-148.
[7] Santos J, Lima A, Silva L, et al. Affordances in the home environment of children at risk of developmental delay[J]. Rev Paul Pediatr, 2023, 41: e2022104.
[8] Gabbard C, Caçola P, Rodrigues LP. A new inventory for Assessing Affordances in the Home Environment for Motor Development (AHEMD-SR)[J]. Early Child Educ J, 2008, 36(1): 5-9.
[9] Zhu T, Chen C, Chen S. Validation of a Chinese version of the five facet mindfulness questionnaire and development of a short form based on item response theory[J]. Curr Psychol, 2023, 42(5): 4212-4224.
[10] Chiesi F, Morsanyi K, Donati MA, et al. Applying item response theory to develop a Shortened Version of the Need for Cognition Scale[J]. Adv Cogn Psychol, 2018, 14(3): 75-86.
[11] Feng C, Liu S, Zhou L, et al. Research Paradigm of the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) with item response theory: Clarification, classification, and challenge[J]. Physiother Res Int, 2025, 30(1): e70021.
[12] Asiye Z, Carl G, Masomeh S, et al. The impact of home motor affordances on motor, cognitive and social development of young children[J]. Iran J Child Neurol, 2019, 13(2): 61-69.
[13] Hsieh Y, Hwang A, Liao H, et al. Psychometric properties of a Chinese version of the Home Environment Measure for Motor Development[J]. Disabil Rehabil, 2011, 33(25-26): 2454-2463.
[14] Gabbard C, Caçola P. Evaluating the home for promoting motor skill development[J]. Phys Act Health Promot Early Years, 2018: 197-210.
[15] Straat JH, van Der Ark LA, Sijtsma K. Minimum sample size requirements for Mokken Scale analysis[J]. Educ Psychol Meas, 2014, 74(5): 809-822.
[16] 曹震宇, 王磊, 涂玥, 等. 基于知识图谱和项目反应理论探析运动疗法学课程重点与难点[J]. 中华医学教育杂志, 2022, 42(12): 1083-1088.
Cao ZY, Wang L, Tu Y, et al. Analysis of key and difficult points in kinesitherapy curriculum based on knowledge graph and item response theory[J]. Chin J Med Educ, 2022,42(12): 1083-1088.(in Chinese)
[17] Feng C, Jiang ZL, Sun MX, et al. Simplified post-stroke functioning assessment based on ICF via Dichotomous Mokken Scale analysis and rasch modeling[J]. Front Neurol, 2022, 13: 827247.
[18] 徐浪, 张芹, 江钟立, 等. 基于ICF和项目反应理论建模评估老年终末期肾病血液透析患者的活动和参与的研究[J].中国康复医学杂志,2023,38(10): 1385-1392.
Xu L, Zhang Q, Jiang ZL, et al. Assessment of activity and participation in elderly end-stage renal disease patients undergoing hemodialysis based on ICF and item response theory modeling[J].Chin J Rehabil Med, 2023,38(10): 1385-1392.(in Chinese)
[19] Lunansky G, Naberman J, van Borkulo C, et al. Intervening on psychopathology networks: Evaluating intervention targets through simulations[J]. Methods, 2022, 204: 29-37.
[20] MacGregor-Fors I, Payton ME. Contrasting diversity values: Statistical inferences based on overlapping confidence intervals[J]. PLoS One, 2013, 8(2): e56794.
[21] R Core Team. R: The R project for statistical computing[M]. Vienna, Austria, 2024.
[22] Sulis I, Porcu M. Handling missing data in item response theory. Assessing the accuracy of a multiple imputation procedure based on latent class analysis[J]. J Classif, 2017, 34(2): 327-359.
[23] Subirana I, Sanz H, Vila J. Building bivariate tables: The compare groups package for R[J]. J Stat Softw, 2014, 57: 1-16.
[24] Sijtsma K, van der Ark LA. A tutorial on how to do a Mokken scale analysis on your test and questionnaire data[J]. Br J Math Stat Psychol, 2017, 70(1): 137-158.
[25] Chalmers RP. Mirt: A multidimensional item response theory package for the R environment[J]. J Stat Softw, 2012, 48: 1-29.
[26] Patil I. Visualizations with statistical details: The "ggstatsplot" approach[J]. J Open Source Softw, 2021, 6(61): 3167.
[27] Field A. Discovering statistics using IBM SPSS statistics[M]. 6th ed. London: Sage Publications, 2024.
[28] 范亚蓓, 陈瑾瑾, 葛盼丽, 等. 基于Hammersmith功能运动量表扩展版的脊髓性肌萎缩症功能评估项目反应理论模型研究[J]. 康复学报, 2024, 34(6): 604-610,632.
Fan YB, Chen JJ, Ge PL, et al. Item response theory modeling for functional assessment of spinal muscular atrophy using Hammersmith Functional Motor Scale-Expanded[J]. Rehabil J, 2024,34(6): 604-610,632.(in Chinese)
[29] Wu YC, Luo YQ, Lin F, et al. Dysphagia-specific instrument based on item response theory and international classification of functioning, disability and health[J]. Dysphagia, 2024, 9: 1-17.
[30] Ayanwale MA, Chere-Masopha J, Morena MC. The classical test or item response measurement theory: The status of the framework at the examination council of Lesotho[J]. Int J Learn Teach Educ Res, 2022, 21(8): 384-406.
[31] Yang Q, Yang J, Zheng L, et al. Impact of home parenting environment on cognitive and psychomotor development in children under 5 years old: A Meta-analysis[J]. Front Pediatr, 2021, 9: 658094.
[32] 於伟, 陈群, 耿宝峰, 等. 基于项目反应理论的康复治疗专业技能培训师生互评模型探索[J]. 中华医学教育杂志, 2023, 43(4): 316-320.
Yu W, Chen Q, Geng BF, et al. Exploration of mutual evaluation model between teachers and students in rehabilitation therapy professional skills training based on item response theory[J]. Chin J Med Educ, 2023,43(4): 316-320.(in Chinese)
[33] 崔德刚, 邱芬, 李中浩, 等. 基于ICF-CY残疾儿童青少年身体活动与功能康复的系统综述[J]. 中国康复理论与实践, 2021, 27(5): 542-552.
Cui DG, Qiu F, Li ZH, et al. Systematic review of physical activity and functional rehabilitation in children and adolescents with disabilities based on ICF-CY[J]. Chin J Rehabil Theory Pract, 2021,27(5): 542-552.(in Chinese)
[34] Zhou L, Feng C, Lu Y, et al. Development and validation of health-oriented personal evaluation for the community-dwelling older person based on the international classification of functioning, disability and health[J]. Int J Older People Nurs, 2024, 19(3): e12609.
[35] 周亮. 基于《国际功能、残疾和健康分类》的老年功能评估研究[D].江苏: 南京医科大学, 2024.
Zhou L. Research on functional assessment of the elderly based on International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health[D]. Jiangsu: Nanjing Medical University, 2024.(in Chinese)
[36] 高焱, 燕铁斌, 尤黎明, 等. Rasch模型用于ICF康复组合中活动和参与成分分值转换的多中心研究[J]. 中华物理医学与康复杂志, 2020, 42(8): 685-689.
Gao Y, Yan TB, You LM, et al. Multicenter study on score conversion of activity and participation components in ICF rehabilitation set using Rasch model[J]. Chin J Phys Med Rehabil, 2020,42(8): 685-689.(in Chinese)
[37] Bush NR, Wakschlag LS, LeWinn KZ, et al. Family environment, neurodevelopmental risk, and the environmental influences on child health outcomes (ECHO) initiative: Looking back and moving forward[J]. Front Psychiatry, 2020, 11: 547.

基金

南京医科大学科技发展基金一般项目(NMUB2018129)

PDF(2023 KB)

Accesses

Citation

Detail

段落导航
相关文章

/