120例典型发育学龄前儿童的言语声诱发听性脑干反应分析

陈碧兰, 刘潘婷, 孙钰英, 俞欣悦, 周佳, 李婷钰, 徐亚琴, 孟黎平, 张蕾, 钱君, 池霞, 洪琴

中国儿童保健杂志 ›› 2025, Vol. 33 ›› Issue (11) : 1256-1260.

PDF(644 KB)
PDF(644 KB)
中国儿童保健杂志 ›› 2025, Vol. 33 ›› Issue (11) : 1256-1260. DOI: 10.11852/zgetbjzz2024-1410
临床研究

120例典型发育学龄前儿童的言语声诱发听性脑干反应分析

  • 陈碧兰1,2, 刘潘婷1,3, 孙钰英4, 俞欣悦2, 周佳4, 李婷钰2, 徐亚琴1, 孟黎平1, 张蕾1, 钱君1, 池霞1,3, 洪琴1,3
作者信息 +

Characteristics of speech evoked auditory brainstem response in 120 preschool children

  • CHEN Bilan1,2, LIU Panting1,3, SUN Yuying4, YU Xinyue2, ZHOU Jia4, LI Tingyu2,XU Yaqin1, MENG Liping1, ZHANG Lei1,QIAN Jun1, CHI Xia1,3, HONG Qin1,3
Author information +
文章历史 +

摘要

目的 分析不同年龄、性别的典型发育学龄前儿童言语声诱发听性脑干反应(speech-ABR)的特征及其影响因素,了解学龄前儿童听处理能力的发展。方法 选取2021年8月参与《学龄前儿童听处理评估量表》南京常模研究中典型发育的120例学龄前儿童进行speech-ABR测试,分析 speech-ABR的年龄、性别差异及影响因素。结果 1)4、5、6岁组间C波振幅差异有统计学意义(H=6.950,P<0.05),两两比较示5岁与6岁组间C波振幅差异有统计学意义(P=0.012)。2)男童的V(Z=3.449)、A(Z=2.845)、D(Z=2.111)、F(Z=3.450)、O波(Z=2.856)潜伏期较女童延长(P<0.05);各波振幅受性别影响小(P>0.05)。3)逐步多元线性回归结果显示,男童较女童的V波潜伏期更长(β=0.290),母亲妊娠年龄25~29岁组比≥35岁组V波潜伏期更短(β=-0.219);与足月生产组(≥37周)相比,早产组(<37周)(β=-0.254)C波潜伏期更短;与本科及以上学历组相比,母亲学历(β=-0.200)大专组的V波振幅更小 (P<0.05)。结论 学龄前儿童speech-ABR存在性别差异,年龄差异较小;母亲妊娠年龄、胎龄、母亲学历可能对脑干编码能力产生影响。

Abstract

Objective To analyze the characteristics and influencing factors of speech-evoked auditory brainstem response (speech-ABR) in typically developed preschool children of different ages and genders, and to understand the development of auditory processing abilities in this population. Methods A total of 120 typically developed preschool children participating in the Nanjing norm study of the Preschool Auditory Processing Assessment Scale in August 2021 were selected for speech-ABR testing.Age and gender differences in speech-ABR parameters, as well as their influencing factors, were analyzed. Results 1) Statistically significant differences in the amplitude of the C-wave were observed among the 4-, 5-, and 6-year-old groups (H=6.950, P<0.05).Post-hoc pairwise comparisons revealed a significant difference between the 5- and 6-year-old groups (P=0.012).2) Boys exhibited prolonged latencies in waves V (Z=3.449), A (Z=2.845), D (Z = 2.111), F (Z=3.450), and O (Z=2.856) compared to girls (P<0.05).Wave amplitudes showed no significant gender-based differences (P>0.05).3) Stepwise multiple linear regression analysis indicated that male gender was associated with longer V-wave latency (β=0.290).Maternal pregnancy age at 25-29 years old (reference:≥35 years old) was associated with shorter V-wave latency (β =-0.219).Preterm birth<37 weeks (reference:≥37 weeks) was associated with shorter C-wave latency (β=-0.254).Higher maternal education level of bachelor′s degree or above (reference: college-educated group) was associated with greater V-wave amplitude (β =-0.200) (all P<0.05). Conclusions Speech-ABR responses in preschool children show significant gender-based differences, with minimal age-related variations.Maternal age at pregnancy, gestational age, and maternal education level may influence brainstem encoding abilities.

关键词

言语诱发听性脑干反应 / 学龄前儿童 / 性别差异 / 听处理

Key words

speech evoked auditory brainstem response / preschool children / gender difference / auditory processing

引用本文

导出引用
陈碧兰, 刘潘婷, 孙钰英, 俞欣悦, 周佳, 李婷钰, 徐亚琴, 孟黎平, 张蕾, 钱君, 池霞, 洪琴. 120例典型发育学龄前儿童的言语声诱发听性脑干反应分析[J]. 中国儿童保健杂志. 2025, 33(11): 1256-1260 https://doi.org/10.11852/zgetbjzz2024-1410
CHEN Bilan, LIU Panting, SUN Yuying, YU Xinyue, ZHOU Jia, LI Tingyu,XU Yaqin, MENG Liping, ZHANG Lei,QIAN Jun, CHI Xia, HONG Qin. Characteristics of speech evoked auditory brainstem response in 120 preschool children[J]. Chinese Journal of Child Health Care. 2025, 33(11): 1256-1260 https://doi.org/10.11852/zgetbjzz2024-1410
中图分类号: R179   

参考文献

[1] Basoz BM, Guler N, Kuru E, et al.Speech auditory brainstem response in audiological practice: A systematic review[J].Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol, 2023, 280(5): 2099-2118.
[2] Liu P, Lin H, Xiao Z, et al.The development, validity, reliability, and norm of a Preschool Auditory Processing Assessment Scale in China[J].Res Dev Disabil, 2022, 128: 104272.
[3] Moore JK, Linthicum FH.The human auditory system: A timeline of development[J].Int J Audiol, 2007, 46(9): 460-478.
[4] Moore JK, Ponton CW, Eggermont JJ, et al.Perinatal maturation of the auditory brain stem response: Changes in path length and conduction velocity.Ear Hear, 1996, 17(5): 411-418.
[5] Stollman MH, van Velzen EC, Simkens HM, et al.Development of auditory processing in 6-12-year-old children: A longitudinal study[J].Int J Audiol, 2004, 43(1): 34-44.
[6] Chen J, Liang C, Wei Z, et al.Atypical longitudinal development of speech-evoked auditory brainstem response in preschool children with autism spectrum disorders[J].Autism Res, 2019, 12(7): 1022-1031.
[7] Kirbac A, Turkyilmaz MD, Yağc1oglu S.Gender effects on binaural speech auditory brainstem response[J].J Int Adv Otol, 2022, 18(2): 125-130.
[8] Højen A, Schmidt ASM, Møller IS, et al.Unequal home literacy environments between preschool-age boys and girls predict unequal language and preliteracy outcomes[J].Acta Psychol, 2022, 230: 103716.
[9] Bölte S, Neufeld J, Marschik PB, et al.Sex and gender in neurodevelopmental conditions[J].Nat Rev Neurol, 2023, 19(3): 136-159.
[10] Stein J.The magnocellular theory of developmental dyslexia[J].Dyslexia, 2001, 7(1): 12-36.
[11] Guo N, Si X, Zhang Y, et al.Speech frequency-following response in human auditory cortex is more than a simple tracking[J].Neuroimage, 2021, 226: 117545.
[12] Chung WL, Bidelman GM.Mandarin-speaking preschoolers′ pitch discrimination, prosodic and phonological awareness, and their relation to receptive vocabulary and reading abilities[J].Read Writ, 2021, 34(2): 337-353.
[13] MacLean J, Stirn J, Sisson A, et al.Short- and long-term neuroplasticity interact during the perceptual learning of concurrent speech[J].Cereb Cortex, 2024, 34(2): bhad543.
[14] 李曼珊,马兰芳,宋海霞, 等.不同年龄段妊娠并发症/合并症及妊娠结局的分析[J].贵州医药, 2021,45(10):1557-1559.
Li MS, Ma LF, Song HX, et al.Analysis of pregnancy complications/comorbidities and pregnancy outcomes at different ages[J].Guizhou Med J, 2021,45(10):1557-1559.(in Chinese)
[15] Lean SC, Heazell AEP, Dilworth MR, et al.Placental dysfunction underlies increased risk of fetal growth restriction and stillbirth in advanced maternal age women[J].Sci Rep, 2017, 7(1): 9677.
[16] Ribas-Prats T, Arenillas-Alcón S, Lip-Sosa DL, et al.Deficient neural encoding of speech sounds in term neonates born after fetal growth restriction[J].Developmental Sci, 2022, 25(3): e13189.
[17] Coughlan S, Quigley J, Nixon E.Parent-infant conversations are differentially associated with the development of preterm- and term-born infants[J].J Exp Child Psychol, 2024, 239: 105809.
[18] Monson BB, Ambrose SE, Gaede C, et al.Language exposure for preterm infants is reduced relative to fetuses[J].J Pediatr, 2023, 262: 113344.
[19] Almadhoob A, Ohlsson A.Sound reduction management in the neonatal intensive care unit for preterm or very low birth weight infants[J].Cochrane Db Syst Rev, 2015, 1: CD010333.
[20] Di Fiore JM, Liu G, Loparo KA, et al.The effect of early postnatal auditory stimulation on outcomes in preterm infants[J].Pediatr Res, 2024, 96(6): 1389-1396.
[21] Romeo RR, Uchida L, Christodoulou JA.Socioeconomic status and reading outcomes: Neurobiological and behavioral correlates[J].New Dir Child Adolesc Dev, 2022, 2022(183-184): 57-70.

基金

南京市卫生科技发展专项资金项目(YKK21157); 江苏省妇幼健康科研项目(F202113)

PDF(644 KB)

Accesses

Citation

Detail

段落导航
相关文章

/