学龄儿童日常身体活动与家庭支持性因素的关联

李翊嘉, 赵晗华, 高莹

中国儿童保健杂志 ›› 2025, Vol. 33 ›› Issue (5) : 503-507.

PDF(539 KB)
PDF(539 KB)
中国儿童保健杂志 ›› 2025, Vol. 33 ›› Issue (5) : 503-507. DOI: 10.11852/zgetbjzz2024-0818
科研论著

学龄儿童日常身体活动与家庭支持性因素的关联

  • 李翊嘉, 赵晗华, 高莹
作者信息 +

Associations between daily physical activity and family supportive factors for school-aged children

  • LI Yijia, ZHAO Hanhua, GAO Ying
Author information +
文章历史 +

摘要

目的 了解学龄儿童日常身体活动现况,及其与家庭支持性因素的关系,为促进儿童身体活动提供参考依据。方法 2022年4—6月,选取杭州市某小学88名8~12岁学龄儿童为研究对象,平均年龄(10.72±0.96)岁,男童57人(64.8%),连续7天佩戴三轴加速度计采集睡眠、久坐行为、低强度身体活动(LPA)和中高强度身体活动(MVPA)指标,使用身体活动家庭支持性问卷(PAP-C)对儿童自我感知的家庭支持性因素(父母自主支持、父母参与度和父母身体活动结构)进行调查。多重线性回归方法分析身体活动与家庭支持性因素的关联。结果 学龄儿童日均睡眠(9.28±0.71)h,久坐行为(10.12±1.19)h,LPA(2.99±0.86)h,MVPA(1.61±0.57)h。总体而言,家庭支持性因素与学龄儿童MVPA时间存在显著关联(P<0.05),与睡眠时间、久坐时间无显著关联(P>0.05)。性别比较显示,父母自主支持得分与男童MVPA时间呈正相关(β=0.281,P<0.05);父母身体活动结构得分与女童LPA时间呈负相关(β=-0.760,P<0.05)。结论 学龄儿童整体呈现久坐时间较长、身体活动水平较高特征。家庭支持性因素与学龄儿童MVPA关系密切,未来需要重视家庭支持性环境对学龄儿童身体活动的影响。

Abstract

Objective To assess the level of daily physical activity, and associations between daily physical activity and family supportive factors for school-aged children, in order to provide a reference for promoting children's physical activity. Methods From April to June 2024, a total of 88 school-aged children aged 8 - 12 years were recruited from an elementary school in Hangzhou, with the average age of (10.72±0.96) years old. Among them, 57(64.8%) were boys. All the participants wore triaxial accelerometers for 7 consecutive days to collect data on sleep, sedentary behavior , low-intensity physical activity (LPA), and moderate-to-vigorous physical activity (MVPA). The Physical Activity Parenting Questionnaire for Children (PAP-C) was used to assess children's self-perceived family supportive factors, including parental autonomy support, parental involvement, and parental physical activity structure. Multiple linear regression analysis was conducted to examine the associations between physical activity and family supportive factors. Results The average daily sleep duration of school-aged children was (9.28±0.71) hours, sedentary time was (10.12±1.19) hours, LPA was (2.99±0.86) hours, and MVPA was (1.61±0.57) hours. Overall, family supportive factors were significantly associated with MVPA time in school-aged children (P<0.05), but not with sleep duration or SB time (P>0.05). Gender-specific analysis revealed that parental autonomy support scores were positively correlated with MVPA time in boys (β=0.281, P<0.05), while parental physical activity structure scores were negatively correlated with LPA time in girls (β=-0.760, P<0.05). Conclusions School-aged children generally exhibit prolonged sedentary time and relatively high levels of physical activity. Family supportive factors are closely related to MVPA in school-aged children. Future efforts should emphasize the influence of family supportive environments on the physical activity of school-aged children.

关键词

身体活动 / 久坐行为 / 学龄儿童 / 家庭支持性因素

Key words

physical activity / sedentary behavior / school-aged children / family supportive factors

引用本文

导出引用
李翊嘉, 赵晗华, 高莹. 学龄儿童日常身体活动与家庭支持性因素的关联[J]. 中国儿童保健杂志. 2025, 33(5): 503-507 https://doi.org/10.11852/zgetbjzz2024-0818
LI Yijia, ZHAO Hanhua, GAO Ying. Associations between daily physical activity and family supportive factors for school-aged children[J]. Chinese Journal of Child Health Care. 2025, 33(5): 503-507 https://doi.org/10.11852/zgetbjzz2024-0818
中图分类号: R179   

参考文献

[1] Tremblay MS, Leblanc AG, Kho ME, et al. Systematic review of sedentary behaviour and health indicators in school-aged children and youth[J]. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act, 2011, 8: 98.
[2] Roth SE, Gill M, Chan-golstoN AM, et al. Physical activity correlates in middle school adolescents: Perceived benefits and barriers and their determinants[J]. J Sch Nurs, 2019, 35(5): 348-58.
[3] 国务院办公厅. 国务院关于实施健康中国行动的意见[EB/OL].[2019-07-15]. https://www.gov.cn/zhengce/content/2019-07/15/content_5409492.htm.
[4] Saunders RP, Dowda M, Dishman RK, et al. A longitudinal examination of direct and indirect influences of parental behaviors on child physical activity[J]. J Child Fam Stud, 2024, 33(7): 2262-2270.
[5] Petersen TL, Møller LB, Brønd JC, et al. Association between parent and child physical activity: A systematic review[J]. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act, 2020;17(1):67.
[6] Gao Y, Cronin NJ, Nevala N, et al. Validity of long-term and short-term recall of occupational sitting time in Finnish and Chinese office workers[J]. J Sport Health Sci, 2020, 9(4): 345-51.
[7] 刘静民, 侯筱, 管健,等. 家庭体育环境特征对青少年身体活动水平影响[J]. 中国公共卫生, 2021, 37(10): 1556-1561.
Liu JM, Hou X, Guan J,et al. Influence of family sports environment on physical activity among urban adolescents in China[J].Chin J Public Health, 2021, 37(10): 1556-1561.(in Chinese)
[8] Corder K, van Sluijs EM, McMinn AM, et al. Perception versus reality awareness of physical activity levels of British children[J]. Am J Prev Med, 2010, 38(1): 1-8.
[9] Kang H. Sample size determination and power analysis using the G Power software[J]. J Educ Eval Health Prof, 2021, 18: 17.
[10] Serdar CC, Cihan M, Yücel D, et al. Sample size, power and effect size revisited: simplified and practical approaches in pre-clinical, clinical and laboratory studies[J]. Biochem Med (Zagreb), 2021, 31(1):010502.
[11] Laukkanen A, Aunola K, Korhonen E, et al. Construct validity and reliability of the physical activity parenting questionnaire for children (PAP-C)[J]. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act, 2021, 18(1): 61.
[12] Anderson CB, Hagströmer M, Yngve A. Validation of the PDPAR as an adolescent diary: Effect of accelerometer cut points[J]. Med Sci Sports Exerc, 2005, 37(7): 1224-30.
[13] Yang Y, Schumann M, Le S, et al. Reliability and validity of a new accelerometer-based device for detecting physical activities and energy expenditure[J]. Peer J, 2018, 6: e5775.
[14] Yang L, Cao C, Kantor ED, et al. Trends in sedentary behavior among the US population, 2001-2016[J]. JAMA, 2019, 321(16):1587-1597.
[15] Verloigne M, Van Lippevelde W, Maes L, et al. Levels of physical activity and sedentary time among 10- to 12-year-old boys and girls across 5 European countries using accelerometers: An observational study within the ENERGY-project[J]. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act, 2012, 9: 34.
[16] Bull F C, Al-Ansari SS, Biddle S, et al. World Health Organization 2020 guidelines on physical activity and sedentary behaviour[J]. Br J Sports Med, 2020, 54(24):1451-1462.
[17] Motuma A, Gobena T, Roba KT, et al. Long sedentary time is associated with worsened cardiometabolic risk factors among university employees in Eastern Ethiopia[J]. Sci Rep, 2022, 12(1):22431.
[18] Chau JY, Grunseit AC, Chey T, et al. Daily sitting time and all-cause mortality: A meta-analysis[J]. PLoS One, 2013, 8(11):e80000.
[19] Agbaje AO. Accelerometer-based sedentary time and physical activity from childhood through young adulthood with progressive cardiac changes: A 13-year longitudinal study[J]. Eur J Prev Cardiol, 2024, 31(12):1480-1492.
[20] 高莹, 李青阳, 王健. 久坐间断的生理学基础及干预效应[J].中国公共卫生,2022, 38(12): 1623-1629.
Gao Y, Li QY, Wang J. Physiological effects of breaking up prolonged sitting time: A review[J]. Chin J Public Health, 2022, 38(12): 1623-1629. (in Chinese)
[21] 姜晓慧, 赵晗华, 王健,等. 儿童青少年身体活动与静态行为现状及建成环境关联研究进展[J].中国学校卫生,2022, 43(7): 1116-1120.
Jiang XH, Zhao HH, Wang J, et al. Physical activity, sedentary behavior and associations with built environment for children and adolescents[J]. Chin J Sch Health, 2022, 43(7): 1116-1120.(in Chinese)
[22] 郭强, 汪晓赞, 蒋健保. 我国儿童青少年身体活动与久坐行为模式特征的研究[J].体育科学,2017, 37(7): 17-29.
Guo Q,Wang XZ, Jiang JB.The patterns of physical activity and sedentary behavior in Chinese children and adolescents[J]. China Sport Science,2017,37(7):17-29.(in Chinese)
[23] Pugliese J, Tinsley B. Parental socialization of child and adolescent physical activity: A meta-analysis[J]. J Fam Psychol, 2007, 21(3):331-343.
[24] 徐陆璐, 董宝林. 青少年感知父母支持与身体活动的关系:交叉滞后研究[J].中国体育科技. 2021, 57(9): 60-66.
Xu XL, Dong BL. The relationship between perceived parental support and physical activity about adolescents:A cross-lagged analysis[J].China Sport Science and Technology, 2021, 57(9): 60-66.(in Chinese)
[25] Khan SR, Uddin R, Mandic S, et al. Parental and peer support are associated with physical activity in adolescents: Evidence from 74 countries[J]. Int J Environ Res Public Health, 2020,17(12):4435.
[26] Vega-Díaz M, González-García H, de Labra C. Influence of parental involvement and parenting styles in children's active lifestyle: A systematic review[J]. PeerJ, 2023, 11: e16668.
[27] Obradović J, Sulik MJ, Shaffer A. Learning to let go: Parental over-engagement predicts poorer self-regulation in kindergartners[J]. J Fam Psychol, 2021, 35(8): 1160-1170.
[28] Koning M, de Jong A, de Jong E, et al. Agreement between parent and child report of physical activity, sedentary and dietary behaviours in 9-12-year-old children and associations with children's weight status[J]. BMC Psychol, 2018, 6(1): 14.
[29] Go D, Jeon M, Lee S, et al. Analyzing differences between parent- and self-report measures with a latent space approach[J]. PLoS One, 2022, 17(6): e0269376.
[30] Brazendale K, Beets MW, Armstrong B, et al. Children's moderate-to-vigorous physical activity on weekdays versus weekend days: A multi-country analysis[J]. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act, 2021, 18(1):28.
[31] Kretschmer L, Salali GD, Andersen LB, et al. Gender differences in the distribution of children's physical activity: Evidence from nine countries[J]. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act, 2023, 20(1):103.
[32] Brazo-Sayavera J, Aubert S, Barnes JD, et al. Gender differences in physical activity and sedentary behavior: Results from over 200,000 Latin-American children and adolescents[J]. PLoS One, 2021, 16(8): e0255353.

基金

国家自然科学基金项目(82003485,82111530074)

PDF(539 KB)

Accesses

Citation

Detail

段落导航
相关文章

/