江苏省“二胎”学龄前儿童家庭养育环境与行为问题分析

田甜, 宋佳, 李婧, 袁慧, 沈蒙蒙, 丁蓉, 朱小华, 徐鸿泽, 胡幼芳

中国儿童保健杂志 ›› 2023, Vol. 31 ›› Issue (6) : 623-628.

PDF(638 KB)
PDF(638 KB)
中国儿童保健杂志 ›› 2023, Vol. 31 ›› Issue (6) : 623-628. DOI: 10.11852/zgetbjzz2022-1075
科研论著

江苏省“二胎”学龄前儿童家庭养育环境与行为问题分析

  • 田甜, 宋佳, 李婧, 袁慧, 沈蒙蒙, 丁蓉, 朱小华, 徐鸿泽, 胡幼芳
作者信息 +

Family rearing environment and behavior problems of the second child aged 4 to 6 years in Jiangsu Province

  • TIAN Tian, SONG Jia, LI Jing, YUAN Hui, SHEN Mengmeng, DING Rong, ZHU Xiaohua, XU Hongze, HU Youfang
Author information +
文章历史 +

摘要

目的 了解江苏省“二胎”学龄前儿童家庭养育环境及行为问题现状,探索“二胎”儿童行为问题与家庭养育环境关系,为促进“二胎”儿童早期行为健康发展提供理论依据。方法 于2019年3—7月采用分层整群随机抽样,抽取江苏省南京、无锡、南通、镇江、扬州、宿迁、连云港7个城市中符合纳入标准的1 181名4~6岁“二胎”儿童,采用3~6岁幼儿家庭养育环境量表、4~16岁Achenbach儿童行为量表进行调查研究,并采用χ2检验、单因素分析、多因素Logistic回归分析等统计方法进行分析。结果 江苏省4~6岁“二胎”儿童不良家庭养育环境总检出率为9.48%(112/1 181),情感温暖/自我表达维度不良检出率最高。行为问题总检出率高达15.92%(188/1 181),4岁组、5岁组躯体体诉(χ2=4.027)和性问题(χ2=4.374)因子检出率差异有统计学意义(P<0.05),不良家庭养育环境下不良行为检出率显著高于良好以及中等家庭养育环境(χ2=9.901、26.853,P<0.01)。多因素分析显示,语言/认知信息中等环境(OR=0.572)、良好环境(OR=0.464)以及忽视/干涉/惩罚良好环境(OR=0.400)是“二胎”学龄前儿童行为问题的保护因素(P<0.01)结论 江苏省4~6岁“二胎”行为问题现状不容乐观,行为问题的发生与家庭养育环境的多个方面均息息相关。应加强对“二胎”学龄前儿童行为健康发展的关注及相关知识的普及,鼓励养育者积极建立良好的家庭养育环境。

Abstract

Objective To understand the current situation of family rearing environment and behavioral problems of the "second child" aged 4 to 6 years in Jiangsu Province, and to explore the relationship between behavioral problems and family rearing environment, so as to provide theoretical basis for promoting the healthy development of "second child". Methods Using stratified cluster random sampling, a total of 1 181 "second child" aged 4 to 6 years who met the inclusion criteria in Nanjing, Wuxi, Nantong, Zhenjiang, Yangzhou, Suqian and Lianyungang in Jiangsu Province were selected from March to July 2019. The Family Rearing Environment Scale for 3- to 6-year-old children and Achenbach Behavior Scale for 4- to 16-year-old children were used for investigation. χ2 test, univariate analysis, multivariates regression analysis and correlation analysis were used to analyze data. Results The total detection rate of poor family rearing environment of 4- to 6-year-old "second child"preschoolers in Jiangsu Province was 9.48%(112/1 181), and the detection rate of poor environment of emotional warmth/self-expression was the highest. The total detection rate of behavioral problems was as high as 15.92%(188/1 181). There was significant difference in the detection rate of somatic complaints(χ2=4.027) and sexual problem factors(χ2=4.374) between 4-year-old children and 5-year-old children (P<0.05). The detection rate of behavioral problems in poor family rearing environment was significantly higher than that in good and medium family rearing environment (χ2=9.901, 26.853, P<0.01). Multivariate analysis showed that moderate (OR=0.572) to good environment(OR=0.464) of language/cognitive information, good environment of neglect/intervention/punishment (OR=0.400) were protective factors for behavioral problems of "second-child" preschoolers (P<0.01). Conclusions The current situation of behavioral problems of "the second child" aged 4 to 6 in Jiangsu Province is not optimistic, and behavioral problems are closely related to many aspects of family rearing environment. More attention should be paid to the healthy development of the behavior of "second child" preschoolers and the spread of relevant knowledge. Besides, caregiversare encouraged to actively establish a good family rearing environment.

关键词

二胎 / 学龄前儿童 / 行为问题 / 家庭养育环境

Key words

"the second child" / preschool children / behavioral problems / family rearing environment

引用本文

导出引用
田甜, 宋佳, 李婧, 袁慧, 沈蒙蒙, 丁蓉, 朱小华, 徐鸿泽, 胡幼芳. 江苏省“二胎”学龄前儿童家庭养育环境与行为问题分析[J]. 中国儿童保健杂志. 2023, 31(6): 623-628 https://doi.org/10.11852/zgetbjzz2022-1075
TIAN Tian, SONG Jia, LI Jing, YUAN Hui, SHEN Mengmeng, DING Rong, ZHU Xiaohua, XU Hongze, HU Youfang. Family rearing environment and behavior problems of the second child aged 4 to 6 years in Jiangsu Province[J]. Chinese Journal of Child Health Care. 2023, 31(6): 623-628 https://doi.org/10.11852/zgetbjzz2022-1075
中图分类号: R179   

参考文献

[1] 代倩倩,娄海琴,刘维韦,等. 南通市城区学龄前非独生儿童忽视状况[J]. 中国学校卫生, 2022,43(2):238-241, 246.
Dai Q, Lou HQ, Liu WW, et al. Neglect among preschool non-only-child in urban area of Nantong City[J]. Chin J Sch Health, 2022,43(2):238-241, 246.(in Chinese)
[2] Buist KL, Verhoeven M, Hoksbergen R,et al. Associations of perceived sibling and parent-child relationship quality with internalizing and externalizing problems: Comparing Indian and Dutch early adolescents[J]. J Early Adolesc, 2017, 37(8):1163-1190.
[3] 边思倩,田甜,李婧,等. 学龄前期头胎儿童同胞关系影响因素分析[J]. 中国妇幼健康研究, 2020,31(8):1035-1039.
Bian SQ, Tian T, Li J, et al. Analsis on the influencing factors of sibling relationship among the firstborn children in preschool[J]. Chinese Journal of Woman and Child Health Research, 2020,31(8):1035-1039.(in Chinese)
[4] Campione-Barr Nicole. The changing nature of power, control, and influence in sibling relationships[J]. New Dir Child Adolesc Dev, 2017(156):7-14.
[5] 何守森,关春荣,吴茂萍,等. 学龄前儿童行为问题有关影响因素的研究[J]. 中国儿童保健杂志, 2011,19(11):992-995.
He SS, Guan CR, Wu MP, et al. Study on the influence factors of behavior problems of preschoolers[J]. Chin J Child Health Care, 2011,19(11):992-995.(in Chinese)
[6] 田甜,宋佳,秦月意,等. 江苏省学龄前儿童行为问题及其与家庭养育环境关系的研究[J]. 中国儿童保健杂志, 2017,25(12):1215-1217.
Tian T,Song J, Qin YY, et al. Study on relationship between home nurture environment and behavior problems of preschool children in Jiangsu province[J]. Chin J Child Health Care, 2017,25(12):1215-1217.(in Chinese)
[7] 杨玉凤.儿童发育行为心理评定量表[M].北京:人民卫生出版社,2016.
Yang YF. Rating Scales For Children's Development Behavior and Mental Health [M]. Beijing: People's Health Publishing House, 2016.(in Chinese)
[8] 忻仁娥, 张志雄. 全国22个省市26个单位24 013名城市在校少年儿童行为问题调查:—独生子女精神卫生问题的调查,防治和Achenbach's儿童行为量表中国标准化[J]. 上海精神医学,1992(1):47-55.
Xin RE, Zhang ZX. Behavior of 24 013 urban school children in 26 units of 22 Provinces and cities nationwide Survey: Survey on mental health problems of only children, prevention and treatment and Achenbach's Children's Behavior Scale Standardization in China[J]. Shanghai Arch Psychiatr, 1992(1):47-55.(in Chinese)
[9] Price JM, Chiapa A, Walsh NE. Predictors of externalizing behavior problems in early elementary-aged children: The role of family and home environment[J].J Genet Psychol, 2013,174(4):464-471.
[10] 李文灏,张悦,杨金柳行,等. 我国城市3~5岁儿童家庭常见养育问题的现状调查[J]. 中国儿童保健杂志,2020,28(9):962-966.
Li WH,Zhang Y, Yang JLX, et al. Crossectional study of parenting difficulties in children aged 3 to 5 years in urban China[J]. Chin J Child Health Care, 2020,28(9):962-966.(in Chinese)
[11] 穆立娟,吕莹,赵静,等. 3~6岁儿童行为问题与家庭养育环境的相关性研究[J]. 中国儿童保健杂志,2018,26(1):63-66.
Mu LJ, Lü Y, Zhao J, et al. Study on correlation behavior family rearing environment and behavior development of 3-6 years old children[J]. Chin J Child Health Care, 2018,26(1):63-66.(in Chinese)
[12] 陈静,刘漪,杜亚松,等.中小班学龄前儿童父母亲职压力与儿童心理状况的影响因素研究[J].中国儿童保健杂志,2018,26(7):737-740.
Chen J, Liu Y,Du YS, et al. Survey of parental stress of junior and middle classes of kindergarten and its influence factors[J]. Chin J Child Health Care, 2018, 26(7):737-740.(in Chinese)
[13] 洪秀敏,刘倩倩. 父母养育压力的类型及——基于一孩父母和两孩父母的潜在剖面分析[J]. 中国临床心理学杂志, 2020,28(4): 766-772.
Hong XM, Liu QQ. Types of parenting stress and its influencing factors—based on latent profile analysis of one-child parents and two-child parents[J]. Chinese Journal of Clinical Psychology, 2020, 28(4): 766-772.(in Chinese)
[14] Chau V, Giallo R. The relationship between parental fatigue, parenting self-efficacy and behaviour: Implications for supporting parents in the early parenting period[J]. Child Care Health Dev, 2014, 41(4):626-633.
[15] 程进,谢瑞瑾,王锦等. 安徽省3~6岁儿童行为问题及相关因素[J]. 中华疾病控制杂志, 2022,26(5):615-620.
Cheng J, Xie RJ, Wang J, et al. Behavior problems and relevant factors among children aged 3-6 yeras old in Anhui Province[J].Chinese Journal of Disease Control & Prevention,2022,26(5):615-620.(in Chinese)
[16] Gustafsson BM, Proczkowska-Björklund M, Gustafsson PA. Emotional and behavioral problems in Swedish preschoolchildren rated by preschool teachers with the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ)[J]. BMC Pediatr, 2017, 17(1):110.
[17] Daelmans B, DarmstadtGL, LombardiJ, et al. Early childhood development: The foundation of sustainable development[J].Lancet, 2017, 368(10064):9-11.
[18] Basten M, Tiemeier H, Althoff RR, et al. The stability of problem behavior across the preschool years: An empirical approach in the general population[J]. J Abnorm Child Psychol, 2016(44):393-404.
[19] McCall RB, Groark CJ, Hawk BN, et al. Early caregiver-child interaction and children's development: Lessons from the St. Petersburg-USA orphanage intervention research project[J]. Clin Child Fam Psychol Rev, 2019, 22(2):208-224.
[20] 李佳,王雪娜,杜雯雯,等. 家庭养育环境对儿童早期发展影响的研究进展[J]. 中国儿童保健杂志, 2021,29(10),1096-1099,1104.
Li J, Wang XN, Du WW,et al. Research progress on the influence of family nurturing environment on early childhood development[J]. Chin J Child Health Care, 2021, 29(10): 1096-1099,1104.(in Chinese)
[21] 连光利,王惠珊,黄小娜,等. 幼儿社会性和情绪发展与行为问题的相关性研究[J]. 中国儿童保健杂志, 2008,16(2),139-140,143.
Lian GL, Wang HS, Huang XN, et al. Study on correlation between social emotional development and behavior problems in 2-3 years old children[J]. Chin J Child Health Care, 2008,16 (2), 139-140,143.(in Chinese)
[22] 崔宇杰,张云婷,赵瑾,等.我国儿童早期发展工作现状分析及策略建议[J].华东师范大学学报(教育科学版), 2019,37(3):107-117.
Cui YJ, Zhang YT, Zhao J, et al. Current situation analysis and strategy suggestions for early child development in China[J]. Journal of East China Normal University (Educational Sciences), 2019, 37(3):107-117.(in Chinese)
[23] D'Sa1 S, Foley D, Hannon J, et al. The psychological impact of childhood homelessness—a literature review[J]. Ir J Med Sci, 2021, 190:411-441.

基金

江苏省妇幼健康重点学科(FXK201705);江苏省妇幼健康科研面上重点资助项目(F201804)

PDF(638 KB)

Accesses

Citation

Detail

段落导航
相关文章

/