童年期创伤与知觉压力对青少年焦虑性抑郁障碍的影响

刘传勇, 侯瑞, 王萍

中国儿童保健杂志 ›› 2022, Vol. 30 ›› Issue (10) : 1068-1072.

PDF(848 KB)
PDF(848 KB)
中国儿童保健杂志 ›› 2022, Vol. 30 ›› Issue (10) : 1068-1072. DOI: 10.11852/zgetbjzz2022-0364
科研论著

童年期创伤与知觉压力对青少年焦虑性抑郁障碍的影响

  • 刘传勇, 侯瑞, 王萍
作者信息 +

Influence of childhood trauma and perceived stress in adolescents with anxiety depression disorder

  • LIU Chuan-yong, HOU Rui, WANG Ping
Author information +
文章历史 +

摘要

目的 探讨童年期创伤与知觉压力对青少年焦虑性抑郁障碍(ADD)的影响,为青少年ADD的临床心理治疗提供数据支持。方法 2020年1月—2021年1月首发入住杭州市第七人民医院青少年抑郁障碍患者120例,根据汉密尔顿抑郁量表-17(HAMD17)焦虑/躯体化因子得分分为焦虑性抑郁障碍组(ADD组)和非焦虑性抑郁障碍组(nADD组),每组各60例。分别运用HAMD17、童年期创伤问卷(CTQ-SF)、中文版压力知觉量表(CPSS)测量抑郁水平、童年期创伤和知觉压力水平,比较两组之间的差异,并分析ADD组童年期创伤与知觉压力对焦虑性抑郁的影响模式。结果 1)ADD组与nADD组在年龄、性别、是否独生子女、受教育年限及抑郁病程方面的差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);2)ADD组HAMD17总分、情感虐待、情感忽视、躯体虐待、童年期创伤总分、紧张感、失控感及知觉压力总分高于nADD组,差异有统计学意义(t=3.558、11.374、5.333、4.080、7.796、8.829、11.854、13.276,P<0.01);3)ADD组HAMD17总分与童年期创伤总分、紧张感、失控感及知觉压力总分呈正相关(r=0.415~0.590,P<0.01);ADD组童年期创伤总分与紧张感、失控感及知觉压力总分呈正相关(r=0.306~0.390,P<0.01);4)ADD组知觉压力对焦虑性抑郁有直接路径影响效应(β=0.81,P<0.001),童年期创伤通过知觉压力对焦虑性抑郁有间接路径影响效应(β=0.567,P<0.001)。结论 焦虑性抑郁障碍青少年存在较多的童年期创伤经历和较高的知觉压力水平,知觉压力对焦虑性抑郁不仅具有直接影响,而且在童年期创伤对焦虑性抑郁的影响关系中起着完全中介作用。

Abstract

Objective To explore the influence of childhood trauma and perceived stress in adolescents with anxiety depression disorder(ADD), in order to provide evidence for clinical psychotherapy of adolescents with ADD. Methods From January 2020 to January 2021, a total of 120 adolescents with ADD, who were first hospitalized in Hangzhou Seventh People's Hospital, were divided into ADD group and non-ADD group according to the anxiety/somatization factor score of Hamilton Depression Scale-17(HAMD17), with 60 patients in each group. HAMD17, Childhood Trauma Questionnaire (CTQ-SF) and Chinese Perceived Stress Scale (CPSS) were used to measure the level of depression, childhood trauma and perceived stress. Then the differences of the two groups were compared, and the relationship model among the level of anxiety depression, childhood trauma and perceived stress in ADD group was analyzed. Results 1) There were no significant differences between ADD group and non-ADD group in age, gender, only child or not, years of education and course of depression (P>0.05). 2) The total scores of HAMD17, emotional abuse, emotional neglect, physical abuse, the total score of childhood trauma, tension, loss of control and the total score of perceived stress in the ADD group were significantly higher than those in non-ADD group (t=3.558, 11.374, 5.333, 4.080, 7.796, 8.829, 11.854, 13.276, P<0.01). 3) The total score of HAMD17 in ADD group was positively correlated with the total score of childhood trauma, tension, loss of control and the total score of perceived stress (r=0.415 - 0.590, P<0.01); the total score of childhood trauma in ADD group was positively correlated with tension, loss of control and the total score of perceived stress (r=0.306 - 0.390, P<0.01). 4) Perceived stress had a direct pathway effect on anxiety depression in ADD group (β=0.81, P<0.001), and childhood trauma had an indirect pathway effect on anxiety depression through perceived stress in ADD group (β=0.567, P<0.001). Conclusions Adolescents with anxiety depression disorder have more traumatic experiences in childhood and higher perceived stress level. Perceived stress not only has a direct effect on anxiety depression, but also completely mediates the influence of childhood trauma on anxiety depression.

关键词

焦虑性抑郁 / 童年期创伤 / 知觉压力 / 青少年

Key words

anxiety depression disorder / childhood trauma / perceived stress / adolescent

引用本文

导出引用
刘传勇, 侯瑞, 王萍. 童年期创伤与知觉压力对青少年焦虑性抑郁障碍的影响[J]. 中国儿童保健杂志. 2022, 30(10): 1068-1072 https://doi.org/10.11852/zgetbjzz2022-0364
LIU Chuan-yong, HOU Rui, WANG Ping. Influence of childhood trauma and perceived stress in adolescents with anxiety depression disorder[J]. Chinese Journal of Child Health Care. 2022, 30(10): 1068-1072 https://doi.org/10.11852/zgetbjzz2022-0364
中图分类号: R749.4   

参考文献

[1] Gaynes BN, Rush AJ, Trivedi MH, et al. Major depression symptoms in primary care and psychiatric care settings:A cross-sectional analysis[J]. Ann Fam Med, 2007, 5(2):126-134.
[2] Wirthoff K, Bauer M, Baghai TC, et al. Prevalence and treatment outcome in anxious versus nonanxious depression:Results from the German Algoruthm Project[J]. J Clin Psychiatry, 2010, 71(8):1047-1054.
[3] 张静芳. 计算机认知行为疗法对焦虑性抑郁障碍认知功能的干预研究[D]. 太原:山西医科大学, 2020.
[4] Domschke K, Deckert J, Arolt V, et al. Anxious versus non-anxious depression:Difference in treatment outcome[J]. J Psychopharmacol, 2010, 24(4):621-622.
[5] Fava M, Rush AJ, Alpert JE, et al. Difference in treatment outcome in outpatient with anxious versus nonanxious depression:A STAR* D report[J]. Am J Psychiatry, 2008, 165(3):342-351.
[6] Gaspersz R, Lamers F, Kent JM, et al. Anxious distress predicts subsequent treatment outcome and side effects in depressed patients starting antidepressant teratment[J]. J Psychiatr Res, 2017, 84:41-48.
[7] Kessler RC, Sampson NA, Berglund P, et al. Anxious and non-anxious major depressive disorder in the World Health Organization World Mental Health Surveys[J]. Epidemiol Psych Sci, 2015, 24(3):1-17.
[8] van Bronswijk SC, Lemmens LHJM, Huibers MJH, et al. The influence of comorbid anxiety on the effectiveness of cognitive therapy and interpersonal psychotherapy for major depressive disorder[J]. J Affect Disorders, 2018, 232(1):52-60.
[9] 荆睿. 早期心理干预联合药物治疗对焦虑共病抑郁患者自杀风险、病耻感及依从性的研究[J]. 中国药物与临床, 2020, 20(16):2817-2819.
[10] 侯艳飞, 刘玎, 张小远. 抑郁症患者药物与心理治疗疗效调节变量的系统评价[J]. 中国心理卫生杂志, 2018, 32(3):200-206.
[11] Fava M,Alpert JE, Carmin CN, et al. Clinical correlates and symptom patterns of anxious depression among patients with major depressive disorder in STAR*D[J]. Psychol Med, 2004, 34(7):1299-1308.
[12] 汤毓华. 汉密尔顿抑郁量表 //张作记. 行为医学量表手册[M]. 北京:中华医学电子音像出版社, 2005:225-227.
[13] 赵幸福, 张亚林, 李龙飞, 等. 中文版童年期虐待问卷的信度和效度[J]. 中国临床康复, 2005, 9(20):105-107.
[14] 杨廷忠, 黄汉腾. 社会转型中城市居民心理压力的流行病学研究[J]. 中华流行病学杂志, 2003, 249(1):760-764.
[15] 荣泰生. AMOS与研究方法[M]. 重庆:重庆大学出版社, 2009:123-129.
[16] Kornstein SG, Schneider RK. Clinical features of treatment-resistang depression[J]. J Clin Psychiatry, 2001, 62(Suppl 16):18-25.
[17] Loo HMV, Jonge PD, Romeijn JW, et al. Data-driven subtypes of major depressive disorder:A systematic review[J].BMC Medicine, 2012, 10(1):156.
[18] Adewuya AO, Atilola O, Ola BA, et al. Current prevalence, comorbidity and associated factors for symptoms of depression and gener-alised anxiety in the Lagos State Mental Health Survey(LSMHS), Nigeria[J]. Comprehensive Psychiatry, 2018, 81:60-65.
[19] 杨文敏, 鲁嘉晨, 谭欣, 等. 大学生主观童年创伤对抑郁的影响:抗挫折能力和外向性的多重中介效应[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2021, 37(1):128-136.
[20] Skrautvol K, Naden D. Tolerance limits, self-understanding, and stress resilience in integrative recovery of inflammatory bowel disease[J]. Holist Nurs Pract,2017,31(1):30-41.
[21] 甘宇, 史战明, 胡华. 童年虐待与抑郁发生的机制研究[J]. 四川精神卫生, 2017, 30(6):580-584.
[22] 李雪瑞, 张玲, 胡潇予, 等. 伴自伤行为的女性青少年抑郁障碍患者家庭功能与童年创伤经历的相关性[J]. 四川精神卫生, 2020, 33(4):321-325.
[23] Bick J, Nelson CA. Early adverse experiences and the developing brain[J]. Neuropsychopharmacology, 2016, 41(1):177-196.
[24] 王莹, 杨建立, 焦清艳. 儿童期虐待对伴焦虑的抑郁障碍患者临床症状及个性特征的影响[J]. 中华行为医学与脑科学杂志, 2015, 24(5):451-454.
[25] 杜俊. 催产素系统对经历童年创伤个体在焦虑和抑郁上的调节作用[D]. 成都:电子科技大学, 2020.
[26] 季善玲, 王惠萍, 倪青青. 社会支持在大学生抑郁情绪和童年创伤之间的中介效应[J]. 中国健康心理学杂志, 2017, 25(12):1829-1832.
[27] 叶宝娟, 朱黎君, 方小婷, 等. 知觉压力对大学生抑郁的影响:有调节的中介模型[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2018, 34:497-503.
[28] 富伟伟, 王广曦, 李永娟. 压力与青少年抑郁的关系:有调节的中介效应分析[J]. 中国临床心理学杂志, 2018, 26(4):788-791.
[29] 范志光, 袁群明. 知觉压力对老年人抑郁的影响:有调节的中介模型[J]. 中国临床心理系杂志, 2018, 28(1):168-172.
[30] 马郑豫, 苏志强, 张大均. 抑郁素质-压力理论在童年期的适用性:一项纵向研究[J]. 中国临床心理学杂志, 2018, 26(5):960-965.

基金

浙江省医药卫生科研项目(2021KY254)

PDF(848 KB)

Accesses

Citation

Detail

段落导航
相关文章

/