目的 了解云南省三地区城市流动儿童的忽视现况及主要原因,为有效减少其发生制定干预措施提供科学依据。方法 根据经济及教育水平等因素,2020年9—12月采用多阶段分层整群抽样,抽取昆明市、大理州和临沧市3个地区为调查点,采用《中国城市儿童青少年忽视评价常模量表》,对1 193名学生进行相关调查。结果 云南省三地区6~11岁城市流动儿童总忽视率40.7%(486/1 193),其中城市流动儿童忽视率为40.80%(393/963);非城市流动儿童忽视率为40.4%(93/230)。城市流动儿童男童各层面忽视率大于女童,其中安全层面有统计学意义(χ2=4.417,P<0.05)。不同民族中除医疗层面外,汉族忽视率都高于少数民族,其中身体(χ2=6.963,P<0.05)和情感(χ2=6.850,P<0.05)差异有统计学意义。与云南省农村儿童、中国农村留守儿童、全国儿童相应指标比较,云南省城市流动儿童忽视度较低,差异有统计学意义(6~8岁t=20.281、19.153、13.616,P<0.001;9~11岁t=7.075、13.101、8.047,P<0.001)。结论 云南省三州(市)6~11岁城市流动儿童忽视情况较十年前有所缓解,针对流动儿童实施的相关政策效果逐步显现。家庭教育模式有所转变,“父母教育卷入”使“子女随父母进城务工”逐渐被“父母随子女进城读书”所替代,但是针对低龄流动儿童的社会融合和适应相关问题应持续关注;民族教育层面下儿童忽视率性别差异更小,学校与家庭教育应因地制宜,注重亲子参与。
Abstract
Objective To understand the current situation and main causes of neglect of urban migrant children in three regions of Yunnan Province, so as to provide scientific basis for reducing neglect and formulating intervention measures effectively. Methods According to the economic and educational level and other factors, multi-stage stratified cluster sampling was adopted to select three areas of Kunming, Dali Prefecture and Lincang City were selected as the survey points from September to December 2020. A related survey was conducted among 1 193 students by using the Constant Modulus Table of Neglect Evaluation of Urban Children and Adolescents in China. Results The total neglect rate of urban migrant children aged 6 to 11 in three regions of Yunnan Province was 40.7%(486/1 193), of which the neglect rate of urban migrant children was 40.80%(393/963), the neglect rate of non-urban migrant children was 40.4%(93/230). The neglect rates of urban migrant boys at all levels were significantly higher than those of girls, of which the difference in safety level was statistically significant(χ2=4.417, P<0.05). Except for medical treatment, the neglect rate of Han nationality was higher than that of ethnic minorities(χ2= 6.963, P<0.05), of which the differences in physical neglect and emotional neglect were significant(χ2= 6.963, 6.850, P<0.05). Compared with rural children in Yunnan Province, left-behind children in rural China, and corresponding indicators of children in China, the neglect degree of urban migrant children in Yunnan Province was significantly lower(6- to 8- year-old children t=20.281, 19.153, 13.616, P<0.05; 9- to 11-year-old children t=7.075, 13.101, 8.047, P<0.05). Conclusions Child neglect is less severe than what it was a decade ago, and the effects of relevant policies for migrant children are gradually emerging. The mode of family education has changed. The "involvement of parents in education" has gradually replaced "children working in cities with their parents" by "parents studying in cities with their children". However, the social integration and adaptation of young migrant children should be paid continuous attention. The gender gap in child neglect rates is smaller at the ethnic education level, and school and family education should be tailored to the local context and focus on parent-child participation.
关键词
儿童忽视 /
城市流动儿童 /
家庭教育模式
Key words
child neglect /
urban migrant children /
home education patterns
{{custom_sec.title}}
{{custom_sec.title}}
{{custom_sec.content}}
参考文献
[1] 邝宏达,徐礼平. 流动儿童、留守儿童和随迁儿童的界定及其关系[J]. 青少年研究与实践,2017,32(2):28-33.
[2] 吴石英. 人口变动对居民消费的作用机理和影响效应研究[D].合肥:安徽大学, 2017.
[3] 国家统计局,联合国儿基会,联合国人口基金会.2015 年中国儿童人口状况——事实与数据[EB/OL]. [2020-06-02]. https://www.unicef.cn/media/7711/file.
[4] 潘建平, 古桂雄. 儿童虐待与忽视[M]//古桂雄,戴耀华. 儿童保健学. 北京: 清华大学出版社, 2011: 230-234.
[5] Laura B,Martine BP,RachelZ,et al.Suggestibility in neglectedchildren:The influence of intelligence,language,and socialskills[J].Child Abuse Negl,2018,79: 51-60.
[6] 潘建平.中国儿童青少年忽视评价常模量表[M]//杨玉凤.儿童发育行为心理评定量表.北京:人民卫生出版社,2016:411-416.
[7] 贾芷菁, 凌晓俊. 儿童忽视研究述评[J]. 陕西学前师范学报, 2020,36(9):43-48.
[8] 潘建平, 古桂雄. 儿童虐待与忽视 [M]//古桂雄,戴耀华.儿童保健学. 北京: 清华大学出版社, 2011: 230-234.
[9] 韩芳.云南省农村低年级小学生忽视影响因素分析[J].中国学校卫生, 2014, 35(10):1555-1557.
[10] 韩芳,秦明芳,马春明, 等. 403名农村小学9~11岁学生忽视情况调查分析[J]. 中国儿童保健杂志,2015,23(3):292-294.
[11] 杨文娟, 潘建平, 杨武悦, 等. 中国农村留守与非留守儿童忽视现状分析[J]. 中国学校卫生, 2014, 35(2):169-174.
[12] 潘建平, 王飞, 李敏, 等.中国城市6~11 岁小学生忽视评价常模的研制[J]. 中华预防医学杂志, 2013, 47(2) : 129-134.
[13] 潘建平,张华,王飞,等.中国城市中小学生忽视状况分析[J].中国学校卫生, 2012, 33(4):385-387.
[14] 潘建平,张华,曹春红,等.中国城市小学生忽视状况调查分析[J].中国妇幼卫生杂志,2010,26(1):17-21.
[15] 潘建平. 中国儿童忽视现状与研究展望[J]. 中国学校卫生,2014,35(2):161-164.
[16] 教育部.国家中长期教育改革和发展规划纲要[EB/OL]. (2010-07-29)http://www.moe.gov.cn/srcsite/A01/s7048/201007/t20100729_171904.html
[17] 国务院.中国儿童发展纲要(2011-2020年)[EB/OL].(2011-07-30)http://www.gov.cn/gongbao/content/2011/content_1927200.htm
[18] 代倩倩,娄海琴,刘维韦,等. 南通市城区学龄前非独生儿童忽视状况[J].中国学校卫生, 2022, 43(2):238-246.
[19] 金骏玲. 社会工作机构介入流动儿童社会支持研究[D].昆明:云南大学,2013.
[20] 宋丽群. 小学父母教育卷入类型及对策研究[D]. 曲阜:曲阜师范大学,2019.
[21] 钟引. 中国西部两个省(市) 农村留守与非留守儿童忽视状况[D].重庆:重庆医科大学,2016.
[22] 吕进锋. 少数民族文化教育空间研究 ——以云南省红河州为例[D].昆明:云南师范大学,2021.
[23] 潘建平, 曹春红, 张华, 等. 中国城市小学生忽视影响因素分析[J].中国妇幼健康研究,2010, 21(4):397-401.
[24] 冯晔.儿童忽视问题的成因与对策分析[J].江苏第二师范学院学报,2016,32(2):78-81.
基金
云南省教育厅科研基金项目(2020J1257)