目的 探讨早期介入丹佛模式(ESDM)对孤独症谱系障碍(ASD)婴幼儿干预效果,为改善ASD预后提供依据。 方法 招募2015年6月—2017年6月中山大学附属第三医院儿童发育行为中心临床诊断为ASD的婴幼儿60例。随机分为两组:实验组30例,均接受ESDM干预;对照组30例,为干预等待的ASD婴幼儿。干预时间为每周1次,每次1 h,持续24周。干预前进行基线系统评估,干预后两组均完成儿童心理教育评估(PEP-3)、Gesell量表评估。 结果 ESDM组和对照组月龄、性别差异无统计学意义,干预前两组沟通、社交互动、重复刻板行为、认知、语言、精细动作差异亦无统计学意义(P>0.05)。干预后ESDM组语言、个人-社交较对照组明显提高,差异具有统计学意义(t=2.215、2.379, P＜0.05);ESDM组认知、语言表达、语言理解、小肌肉、模仿、行为特征-非语言的原积分较对照组明显提升,差异有统计学意义(t=2.336、2.510、2.416、2.578、2.017、2.150,P<0.05)。此外,ESDM组Gesell量表中的语言发育商干预前后的差值高于对照组,差异有统计学意义(Z=2.105,P<0.05)。 结论 经ESDM模式干预后,ASD婴幼儿语言、社交明显改善,认知、语言表达、语言理解、小肌肉、模仿能力明显提升,行为特征-非语言的刻板行为明显减少。
Abstract
Objective To explore the effect of early start denver model (ESDM) on toddlers with autism spectrum disorder (ASD), in order to provide evidence for improving the prognosis of ASD. Methods A total of 60 ASD toddlers were recruited from June 2015 to June 2017 in Child Developmental & Behavioral Center, the Third Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University,and were randomly divided into experimental group (n=30) and control group (n=30).Children in experimental group received ESDM intervention, while the control group was in the period of waiting for intervention.The ESDM intervention lasted one hour once a week for 24 weeks.Baseline system assessments were conducted before intervention, PEP-3 and Gesell Development Scale (GDS) were completed in both two groups after intervention. Results Before intervention, there were no statistically significant differences in age, gender, communication, social interaction, repetitive and stereotyped behavior, cognition, language and fine movements between the experimental group and control group (P >0.05).Compared with control group, language and personal-social scores in ESDM group were significantly improved (t=2.215, 2.379, P＜0.05).Furthermore, the raw score of cognition, language expression, language understanding, small muscles, imitation and non-language behavioral characteristics in ESDM group was significantly improved (t=2.336, 2.510, 2.416, 2.578, 2.017, 2.150, P<0.05).In addition, the score gaps of languagedevelopment quotient of GDS in the ESDM group were significantly higher than those in the control group before and after intervention (Z=2.105, P<0.05). Conclusions After ESDM intervention, the language and social communication, cognitive, verbal expression and comprehension, fine movements and imitation abilities of ASD toddlers are significantly improved. Additionally, non-verbal stereotypical behaviors significantly reduce in ASD toddlers.
关键词
孤独症谱系障碍 /
早期介入丹佛模式 /
干预 /
婴幼儿
Key words
autism spectrum disorder /
early start denver model /
intervention /
infants and toddlers
{{custom_sec.title}}
{{custom_sec.title}}
{{custom_sec.content}}
参考文献
[1] Lai MC, Lombardo MV, Baron-Cohen S.Autism [J].Lancet, 2014, 383(9920): 896-910.
[2] Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.Autism and Developmental Disabilities Monitoring (ADDM.2020 Community Report on Autism[M].Atlanta: Georgia, 2020.
[3] Colombi C, Narzisi A, Ruta L, et al.Implementation of the Early Start Denver Model in an Italian community [J].Autism, 2018, 22(2):126-133.
[4] Green J, Garg S.Annual research review: the state of autism intervention science: progress, target psychological and biological mechanisms and future prospects [J].J Child Psychol Psychiatry, 2018, 59(4):424-443.
[5] Vivanti G, Dissanayake C, Duncan E, et al.Outcomes of children receiving Group-Early Start Denver Model in an inclusive versus autism-specific setting: a pilot randomized controlled trial [J].Autism, 2019, 23(5):1165-1175.
[6] Lin TL, Chiang CH, Ho SY, et al.Preliminary clinical outcomes of a short-term low-intensity Early Start Denver Model implemented in the Taiwanese public health system [J].Autism, 2020, 24(5):1300-1306.
[7] American Psychiatric Association.Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders 5th,DSM-5)(American Psychiatric Association.Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (DSM-5)[M]. 5th ed.Washington, DC:American Psychiatric Association, 2013.
[8] Lord C, Rutter M, DiLavore PC, et al.Autism diagnostic observation schedule[S].Los Angeles:Western Psychological Services, 2000.
[9] Adamou M, Jones SL,Wetherhill S.Predicting diagnostic outcome in adult autism spectrum disorder using the autism diagnostic observation schedule, second edition[J].BMC Psychiatry, 2021,21(1):24.
[10] Shek DT, Yu L.Construct validity of the Chinese version of the psycho-educational profile-3rd edition (CPEP-3)[J].J Autism Dev Disord, 2014, 44(11): 2832-2843.
[11] Chen KL, Chiang FM, Tseng MH, et al.Responsiveness of the psychoeducational profile-third edition for children with autism spectrum disorders [J].J Autism Dev Disord, 2011, 41(12):1658-1664.
[12] You J,Shamsi BH, Hao MC, et al.A study on the neurodevelopment outcomes of late preterm infants [J].BMC Neurol, 2019, 19(1):108.
[13] Rogers SJ, Dawson G.Early Start Denver Model for young children with autism.promoting language, learning and engagement[M].New York:Guilford Press,2010.
[14] Sandbank M,Bottema-Beutel K, Crowley S, et al.Project AIM: autism intervention meta-analysis for studies of young children [J].Psychol Bull, 2020,146(1):1-29.
[15] Fuller EA, Oliver K,Vejnoska SF, et al.The effects of the Early Start Denver Model for children with autism spectrum disorder: a meta-analysis [J].Brain Sci, 2020, 12;10(6):368.
[16] Vismara LA, Colombi C, Rogers SJ.Can one hour per week of therapy lead to lasting changes in young children with autism? [J].Autism, 2009,13, 93-115.
[17] Devescovi R, Monasta L, Mancini A, et al.Early diagnosis and Early Start Denver Model intervention in autism spectrum disorders delivered in an Italian Public Health System service[J].Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat, 2016, 14;12:1379-1384.
[18] Rogers SJ, Estes A, Lord C, et al.A multisite randomized controlled two-phase trial of the Early Start Denver Model compared to treatment as usual [J].J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry, 2019, 58(9):853-865.
基金
国家自然科学基金面上项目(81873801)
PDF(450 KB)
