目的 分析超早产儿早期(0~2岁)的体格及神经运动发育特点及存在的问题,为提高及改善超早产儿远期生存质量提供科学依据。方法 分析2016—2019年在南方医科大学附属深圳妇幼保健院高危儿门诊随访的258例超早产儿的体格发育资料,与中国九城市(2005年)的0~2岁儿童的体格发育数据进行比较,对比不同年龄体格发育指标(体重、身长、头围)Z值以及每个指标在不同年龄中小于第10百分位(<P10)及小于第3百分位(<P3)的分布情况;并用贝利Ⅱ婴幼儿量表分别在矫正6、12、18、24月龄进行发育评估。结果 1)超早产儿矫正2岁时体格追赶发育仍不理想,其中身长较好,其次为体重,头围最缓慢,男童身长、体重、头围的Z值分别为:-0.31、-0.51、-0.87,女童为:-0.22、-0.43、-0.54;2)超早产儿矫正2岁以内身长、体重、头围<P10及<P3占比明显高于同龄儿童的理论值P10和P3,其中男童矫正2岁时<P10的对应值分别为17.78、22.22、28.89,<P3的对应值为2.22,13.33,15.56;女童<P10的对应值为13.04、26.09、 21.73;<P3的对应值为8.70、17.39、13.04,身长及体重<P10及<P3的占比随着年龄的增长有逐渐降低的趋势,头围在2岁以内均维持较高水平;3)超早产儿矫正2岁时的智能及运动发育水平与同龄足月儿存在较大差距,2岁以内呈逐渐追赶趋势,女童的发育略优于男童,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论 1)超早产儿矫正2岁以内的体格发育仍然未完成追赶发育,其中身长追赶较好,体重次之,头围追赶最缓慢,早期营养强化的重点应侧重头围及体重的改善。2)超早产儿矫正2岁以内的运动及智能发育均呈逐渐上升趋势,但与同龄儿童比较存在较大差距,应强化训练至2岁以后。
Abstract
Objective To analyze the physical and neuromotor development characteristics and existing problems of extremely preterm infants in the earlylife stage(0 to 2 years old), so as to provide scientific basis for improving the long-term quality of life of extremely preterm infants. Methods The physical development data of 258 extremely preterm infants followed up in the high-risk infant clinic of Shenzhen Maternity & Child Healthcare Hospital from 2016 to 2019 were analyzed and compared with the physical development data of children aged 0 to 2 years in nine cities of China in 2005. Physical development indicators(weight, length and head circumference), the standard deviation Z and the distribution of each indicator less than the 10th percentile(<P10) and less than the 3th percentile(<P3) were compared among different age groups. The development of infants was evaluated by Bayley Ⅱ Infant Scale at the corrected age of 6, 12, 18 and 24 months. Results 1) At the corrected age of 2 years old, the physical catch-up development of extremely preterm infants was still not ideal, in which the body length was better, followed by the weight, while the head circumference developed most slowly. The Z values of body length, weight and head circumference of boys were -0.31, -0.51, -0.87, and those of girls were -0.22, -0.43, -0.54. 2) The proportions of length, weight and head circumference <P10 and <P3 in extremely preterm infants within corrected age of 2 years old were significantly higher than the theoretical values for children with the same age. For boys at the corrected age of 2 years old, the corresponding values of body length, weight and head circumference < P10 were 17.78, 22.22 and 28.89, respectively, while the corresponding values of body length, weight and head circumference < P3 were 2.22, 13.33 and 15.56, respectively. For girls at the corrected age of 2 years old, the corresponding values of body length, weight and head circumference < P10 were 13.04, 26.09 and 21.73, respectively, while the corresponding values of body length, weight and head circumference < P3 were 8.70, 17.39 and 13.04, respectively. The proportions of body length and weight < P10 decreased with age, and the proportion of head circumference maintained a high level within 2 years old. 3) The intelligence and motor development level of extremely preterm infants at the corrected age of 2 years old had a large gap with that of full-term infants with the same age. There was an upward trend of gradually catching up within the age of 2 years. The development of girls was slightly better than that of boys, but the difference was not significant(P>0.05). Conclusions 1) The physical development within corrected age of 2 years old after preterm birth is still not complete catch-up development. The catch-up of body length is ideal, followed by body weight, while the catch-up of head circumference is the slowest. Early nutrition enhancement should be focused on the improvement of head circumference and body weight. 2) The motor and intellectual development of extremely preterm infants within the corrected age of 2 years old shows a gradual increase, but there is a large gap compared to children of the same age and intensive training should be provided until 2 years old.
关键词
超早产儿 /
矫正24月龄内 /
体格发育 /
智能及运动发育
Key words
extremely preterm infants /
corrected age of 24 months old /
physical development /
intellectual and motor development
{{custom_sec.title}}
{{custom_sec.title}}
{{custom_sec.content}}
参考文献
[1] 张应绩,杨传忠,李欢,等.超早产儿和超低出生体重儿存活情况和住院并发症分析[J].中华围产医学杂志,2016,19(10):755-760.
[2] 超未成熟儿与超低出生体重儿研究协作组.广东省2013年与2008年至2012年超低出生体重儿的临床救治结局比较[J].中华围产医学杂志,2017,20(5):358-365.
[3] Marlow N,Wolke D,Bracewell MA,et al.Neurologic and developmental disability at six years of age after extremely preterm birth[J].NEJM, 2005,352(1):9-19.
[4] Hellgren KM,Hellstr MA,Tornqvist K,et al. Ophthalmologic outcome of extremely preterm infants at 6.5 years of age. EXPRESS[J].JAMA Ophthalmology, 2015,19(4):46.
[5] Saroj S, Kimberly LD,Van Lieshout RJ,et al.Health, wealth, social integration, and sexuality of extremely low-birth-weight prematurely born adults in the fourth decade of life[J]. JAMA Pediatrics,2016,170(7):678-686.
[6] 黎海芪.实用儿童保健学[M].北京:北京人民出版社.2016:86-88.
[7] 首都儿科研究所,九市儿童体格发育调查协作组.中国七岁以下儿童体重、身长/身高和头围的生长标准值及标准化生长曲线[J].中华儿科杂志,2009,47(3):173-178.
[8] Moore T,Hennessy EM,Myles J,et al.Neurological and developmental outcome in extremely preterm children born in England in 1995 and 2006:The EPICure studies[J].BMJ,2012, 345(2):49-50.
[9] Serenius F,Ewald U,Farooqi A,et al.Neurodevelopmental outcomes among extremely preterm infants 6.5 years after active perinatal care in Sweden[J].JAMA Pediatrics, 2016,170(10):954.
[10] Marlow N,Wolke D,Bracewell MA,et al.Neurologic and developmental disability at six years of age after extremely preterm birth[J].N Engl J Med,2005,352(1):9-19.
[11] Alicia S, Jane O, Peter JA.et al. Early developmental intervention programmes provided post hospital discharge to prevent motor and cognitive impairment in preterm infants[J]. Cochrane Db Syst Rev,2015,11-14.
[12] 朱志成,陈超.超早产儿运动功能远期预后的研究进展[J].中华儿科杂志,2019,57(4):301-304.
[13] 张玉,丁国芳,郭立琳,等.超低出生体重儿4至11岁时的随访结局[J].中华围产医学杂志,2016,19(9):715-721.
[14] 李蓓,冯菁菁,徐秀.早产儿早期神经运动发育纵向随访[J].中国儿童保健杂志,2013, 21(5):470-472.
[15] 江雯,邱双燕,蒋雪明,等.不同出生胎龄早产儿生长发育趋势分析[J].中国儿童保健杂志, 2016,24(7):742-745.
[16] 屈小莉,陈杰荣,刘世新,等.178例超早产儿1岁以内体格追赶的纵向研究[J].中国儿童保健杂志,2019,27(6):588-591.
[17] 屈小莉,杨玉兰,刘世新,等.超早产儿校正月龄24月龄内体格生长分析[J].中华儿科杂志,2020,58(12):982-988.
[18] Cheong JL,Hunt RW,Anderson PJ,et al.Head growth in preterm infants: correlation with magnetic resonance imaging and neurodevelopmental outcome[J]. Pediatrics,2008,121(6):e1534.
[19] 《中华儿科杂志》编辑委员会,中华医学会儿科学分会新生儿学组,中华医学会儿科学分会儿童保健学组.早产/低出生体重儿喂养建议[J].中华儿科杂志,2009,47(7):508-510.
[20] Ehrenkranz RA.Growth in the neonatal intensive care unit influences neurodevelopmental and growth outcomes of extremely low birth weight infants[J]. Pediatrics, 2006, 117(4):1253.
[21] Verter J, Bauer CR, Steichen JJ, et al. Neurodevelopmental and functional outcomes of extremely low birth weight infants in the national institute of child health and human development neonatal research network,1993-1994[J].Pediatrics,2000,105(6):1216-1226.
[22] 刘维民,鲍秀兰,马磊,等.早期干预降低极低出生体重儿脑瘫发生率的临床研究[J].中国儿童保健杂志,2015,23(4):360-363.
[23] 张国庆,邵肖梅,陆春梅,等.NICU出院早产儿1岁时神经发育预后及干预依从性对其的影响[J].中国当代儿科杂志, 2007, 9(3):193-197.
[24] van Dommelen P,Verkerk PH,van Straaten HLM. Hearing loss by week of gestation and birth weight in very preterm neonates[J].J Pediatr,2015,166(4):840-843.