目的 分析家长参与的康复训练对功能性障碍患儿构音清晰度的疗效,为临床综合性治疗提供科学依据。 方法 选取2018年9月—2020年1月在株洲市中心医院康复治疗科治疗的67例功能性构音障碍患儿为研究对象,按随机数字表法随机分为家长参与组33例和常规组34例。两组均予以常规构音训练,家长参与组在常规组的基础上增加家长参与整个治疗过程、每周1次家长培训和每日微信打卡作业,共治疗12周。比较两组治疗前后采用构音清晰度评估和疗效评定。 结果 治疗12周后,两组构音清晰度均较治疗前明显提高(t=22.38、25.50,P<0.01),且家长参与组治疗后构音清晰度高于常规组,差异有统计学意义(t=5.10,P<0.01);家长参与组每周平均家中练习天数与总有效率均显著高于常规组(t=16.08、χ2=19.90 ,P<0.01)。 结论 结合家长参与的康复训练对功能性构音障碍患儿疗效明显。
Abstract
Objective To analyze the efficacy of rehabilitation training combined with parental participation on the articulation of children, so as to lay a scientific foundation for the clinical treatment of functional dysarthria. Methods A total of 67 children with functional dysarthria in the department of rehabilitation, Zhuzhou Central Hospital, from September 2018 to January 2020 were enrolled in this study. According to the random number table method, children were randomly divided into parental participation group (n=33) and conventional group (n=34).Both groups were given regular articulation training, while parents were involved during the entire treatment process in the parental participation group and trained once a week with daily WeChat check-in for a total of 12 weeks. Results After 12 weeks of treatment, the articulation level was significantly improved than that before treatment both in parental participation group and regular group (t=22.38, 25.50, P<0.01). Moreover, the articulation level of the parental participation group was significantly higher than that of the conventional group (t=5.10, P<0.01). The average days of home exercise and the total effective rate of the parental participation group were significantly higher than those of the conventional group(t=16.08, χ2=19.90, P<0.01). Conclusions Rehabilitation training combined with parental participation is more effective for children with functional dysarthria.
关键词
功能性构音障碍 /
家长参与 /
构音训练
Key words
functional dysarthria /
parental participation /
articulation training
{{custom_sec.title}}
{{custom_sec.title}}
{{custom_sec.content}}
参考文献
[1] 王慧,鲍毓,徐琳,等.儿童功能性构音障碍的临床分析及言语[J].中华物理医学与康复杂志,2011,33(11):835-838.
[2] 戈晓蕊.认知行为干预在小儿功能性构音障碍治疗中的应用研究[J].新疆医学,2019,49(2):175-176
[3] George KG,Raabia G,Rauno P.Are RAN deficits in university students with dyslexia due to defective lexical access, impaired anchoring, or slow articulation?[J].Ann Dyslexia,2018,68(2):85-103.
[4] 高铁英,赵婵娟,郝淑红.功能性构音障碍儿童智力结构分析[J].中国儿童保健杂志,2019,27(4):451-453.
[5] Quan MH,Zhang HB,Zhang JY,et al.Preschoolers' technology-assessed physical activity and cognitive function: A cross-sectional study[J]. J Clin Med,2018,7(5):108-108.
[6] 缪鸿石.康复医学理论与实践[M].上海:科学技术出版社,2000:424-430,892.
[7] 张磊,周林灿,黄昭鸣.语言康复训练实用手册[M].上海:华东师范大学出版社,2010:17-18.
[8] 卫冬洁.语言障碍发音手册[M].北京:中国原子能出版社,2014.
[9] 韩知娟.普通话言语的发展:言语清晰度音位对比及声学特征[D].上海:华东师范大学,2005.
[10] 刘湘云,陈荣华.儿童保健学[M].南京:江苏科学技术出社,2006,51-51.
[11] 周秀芳.一对一机构康复结合家庭康复对功能性构音障碍儿童言语矫治的疗效研究[J].心理月刊,2019,14(13):220-220.
[12] Krueger BI,Storkel HL.Children's response bias and identification of misarticulated words[J].J Speech Lang Hear Res,2020,63(1):259-273.
[13] Alhaidary A.Treatment of speech sound disorders in children:Nonspeech oral exercises[J].Int J Pediatr Adolesc Med,2021,8(1):1-4.
[14] 周平,陈丹,沈洁.儿童学习困难家庭环境影响因素的Meta分析[J].中国学校卫生,2018,39(3):376-378.
[15] 陈丽,戴燕琼,唐亮,等.家庭康复微信小程序对功能性构音障碍患儿的影响[J].中国儿童保健杂志,2020,28(8):947-949.