产前单疗程应用地塞米松对早产儿近远期预后的影响

王进, 耿其蕾, 徐大荣, 朱雪萍

中国儿童保健杂志 ›› 2020, Vol. 28 ›› Issue (11) : 1246-1249.

PDF(398 KB)
PDF(398 KB)
中国儿童保健杂志 ›› 2020, Vol. 28 ›› Issue (11) : 1246-1249. DOI: 10.11852/zgetbjzz2019-1888
临床研究与分析

产前单疗程应用地塞米松对早产儿近远期预后的影响

  • 王进1, 耿其蕾1, 徐大荣1, 朱雪萍2
作者信息 +

Effect of prenatal use of dexamethasone on short-term and long-term prognosis of premature infants

  • WANG Jin1, GENG Qi-lei1, XU Da-rong1, ZHU Xue-ping2
Author information +
文章历史 +

摘要

目的 分析产前单疗程应用地塞米松对早产儿生后近远期影响,为改善早产儿预后提供科学依据。方法 回顾性分析2011年1-12月在盐城市妇幼保健院住院的289例早产儿资料。根据产前是否使用地塞米松分为干预组128例、对照组161例。按胎龄(GA)分成3个亚组:GA<30周、30~33+6周和>34周。对研究对象组一般资料及随访资料进行比较。结果 <30周:干预组点状脑白质损伤和弥漫性脑白质损伤(PWMD+DWMD)、脑室周围白质软化(PVL)、脑室周围-脑室内出血(PIVH-IVH)发生率,3、6岁时个人社交行为评分显著低于对照组(χ2=4.493、4.493、4.305,t =2.454、5.832,P<0.05);1、2、3、6岁时大运动行为评分、精细动作行为评分显著高于对照组(t=3.599、4.231、4.626、8.552、9.171、6.742,P<0.05)。30~33+6周:干预组PVL、PIVH-IVH发生率,3、6岁时个人社交行为评分均显著低于对照组(χ2=4.182、3.852,t=3.431、2.867,P<0.05);1、2、3、6岁的大运动行为评分、精细动作行为评分显著高于对照组(t=2.346、2.975、6.446、5.392、2.541、4.683、1.871、6.043,P<0.05)。>34周:干预组2、3、6岁时大运动行为评分及精细动作行为评分显著高于对照组(t=2.236、3.184、6.130、2.569、5.506、5.131,P<0.05),3、6岁个人社交行为评分显著低于对照组(t=2.473、2.315,P<0.05)。结论 产前单疗程应用地塞米松对小胎龄早产儿脑损伤有一定保护作用,对早产儿远期运动行为有积极影响,但对早产儿远期个人社交行为有不良影响。

Abstract

Objective To investigate effect of prenatal use of dexamethasone on short-term and long-term prognosis of premature infants,so as to provide scientific reference for improving prognosis of preterm infants. Methods A total of 289 premature infants in Yancheng Maternal and Child Health Care Hospital from January to December in 2011 were analyzed retrospectively.All participants were divided into intervention group (n=128) and control group (n=161) according to whether dexamethasone was suitable for prenatal treatment.According to different gestational age (GA),the participants were further divided into three subgroups:GA<30 weeks,30-33+6 weeks and >34 weeks.General data and follow-up data of the different groups were compared. Results In children with GA under 30 weeks,the incidence of PWMD+DWMD,PVL,PIVH-IVH and social interaction score at the age of 3 and 6 years old in intervention group were significantly lower than those in control group(χ2=4.493,4.493,4.305,t=2.454,5.832,P<0.05).And the scores of gross motor behavior and fine motor behavior at the age of 1,2,3,6 years old in intervention group were significantly higher than those in control group(t=3.599,4.231,4.626,8.552,9.171,6.742,P<0.05).In children with GA 30-33+6 weeks,the incidence of PVL and PIVH-IVH,and social interaction score at the age of 3 and 6 years old in intervention group were significantly lower than those in control group(χ2=4.182,3.852, t=3.431,2.867,P<0.05).And the scores of gross motor behavior and fine motor behavior at the age of 1,2,3,6 years old in intervention group were significantly higher than those in control group(t=2.346,2.975,6.446,5.392,2.541,4.683,1.871,6.043,P<0.05).In children with gestational age over 34 weeks,the scores of gross motor behavior and fine motor behavior at the age of 2,3,6 years old in intervention group were significantly higher than those in control group(t=2.236,3.184,6.130,2.569,5.506,5.131,P<0.05),while the scores of social interaction at the age of 3 and 6 years old were significantly lowerer than those in control group (t=2.473,2.315,P<0.05). Conclusion Prenatal application of dexamethasone is of certain protective effect on brain injury of premature infants with small gestational age,and has positive effect on long-term motor and behavior development of premature infants.However,its negative effect on long-term personal social behavior of premature infants is supposed to be considered.

关键词

产前 / 地塞米松 / 早产儿 / 脑损伤 / 神经行为

Key words

prenatal / dexamethasone / premature infants / brain damage / neurobehavior

引用本文

导出引用
王进, 耿其蕾, 徐大荣, 朱雪萍. 产前单疗程应用地塞米松对早产儿近远期预后的影响[J]. 中国儿童保健杂志. 2020, 28(11): 1246-1249 https://doi.org/10.11852/zgetbjzz2019-1888
WANG Jin, GENG Qi-lei, XU Da-rong, ZHU Xue-ping. Effect of prenatal use of dexamethasone on short-term and long-term prognosis of premature infants[J]. Chinese Journal of Child Health Care. 2020, 28(11): 1246-1249 https://doi.org/10.11852/zgetbjzz2019-1888
中图分类号: R722.6   

参考文献

[1] 朱毓纯,杨慧霞,Newnham J,等.早产围产热点问题的循证医学进展[J].中华围产医学杂志,2011,14(6):333-334.
[2] 陈盈,程国强,邵肖梅.产前糖皮质激素临床应用研究进展[J].中国妇幼保健,2012,27(6):946-948.
[3] 虞灿丰.产前应用糖皮质激素对新生儿神经系统的影响[J].儿科药学杂志,2014,20(6):57-61. [4] 中华医学会妇产科学分会产科学组.早产儿的临床诊断与治疗指南[J].中华妇产科杂志,2014,49(7):481-484.
[5] 鲍秀兰.0~3岁儿童最佳的人生开端[M].北京:中国发展出版社,2006.
[6] 中国医师协会新生儿专业委员会.早产儿脑损伤诊断与防治专家共识[J].中国当代儿科杂志,2012,14(12):883-884.
[7] 林传家,李寄平,张秀玲,等.婴幼儿发育检查手册[M].北京:北京市儿童保健所,1986.
[8] 张秀玲,李寄平,秦明镜,等.Gesell发展诊断量表3½~6岁北京修订本的制定[J].中国临床心理学杂志,1994,2(3):148-150.
[9] 黄海燕,陆岸锋,黄国盛,等.新型随访模式下早干预对早产儿神经发育的影响[J].中华妇幼临床医学杂志:电子版,2018,14(3):331-336.
[10] 方学军,谢淑莲,周琛.产前硫酸镁和地塞米松干预治疗对早产儿结局的影响研究[J].基层医学论坛,2017,21(23):3025-3026.
[11] 马新平.早产孕妇产前使用地塞米松对新生儿预后的影响[J].泰山医学院学报,2017,38(7):828-829.
[12] 孟海燕,马新平,邱丹花,等.产前地塞米松对早产儿预后的影响[J].黑龙江医药,2019,32(6):1269-1271.
[13] Elimian A,Garry D,Figueroa R,et al.Antenatal betamethasone compared with dexamethasone(betacode trial):a randomized controlled trial[J].Obstet Gynecol,2007,110(1):26-30.
[14] 郁春,吴明赴,符明凤,等.早产儿颅内出血的高危因素及临床结局[J].贵州医科大学学报,2019,44(12):1486-1490.
[15] 张苑平.早产孕妇产前使用地塞米松对分娩结局及新生儿预后的影响分析[J].中国适用医药,2018,13(23):123-124.
[16] 陶红,商宏恺,仝进毅.产前应用糖皮质激素对胎儿下丘脑-垂体-肾上腺(HPA)轴发育的影响[J].浙江中西医结合杂志,2016,26(5):504-507.
[17] Tijsseling D,Wijnberger LD,Derks JB,et al. Effects of antenatal glucocorticoid therapy on hippocampal histology of preterm infants[J].PLoS One,2012,7(3):e33369.
[18] 曹霞.产前单疗程地塞米松干预对早产儿体格和认知发育的影响[J].山东医药,2016,56(12):79-80.

基金

江苏省优势学科建设工程项目(YSHL1802-33)

PDF(398 KB)

Accesses

Citation

Detail

段落导航
相关文章

/