目的 探讨家庭康复微信小程序对功能性构音障碍患儿的影响, 为临床治疗提供科学依据。方法 选取2018年1月-2019年7月在上海市儿童医院康复科治疗的36例功能性构音障碍(FAD)患儿为研究对象, 随机分为常规家庭康复组和微信小程序组各18例, 治疗8周, 治疗前后, 采用中国康复研究中心制定的构音障碍检查方法进行评价。结果 治疗前, 常规家庭康复组和微信小程序组组间错误音比较, 差异无统计学意义(t=0.72, P=0.48);经8周治疗后, 两组患儿同组治疗前后的错误音比较, 治疗后错误音均明显少于治疗前(t=10.73, 15.74, P<0.01);但家庭微信小程序组治疗后错误音节显著少于常规家庭康复组, 差异有统计学意义(t=0.37, P<0.05)。结论 应用家庭康复微信小程序能更好的改善功能性构音障碍患儿的错误音。
Abstract
Objective To explore the effect of family rehabilitation Wechat program on children with functional articulation disorder (FAD), in order to provide scientific reference for clinical treatment. Methods Totally 36 FAD children treated in rehabilitation department of Shanghai Children's Hospital from January 2018 to July 2019 were enrolled in this study, and were randomly divided into routine family rehabilitation group and Wechat small program group, with 18 cases in each group.And the intervention last for 8 weeks.Before and after treatment, the articulation disorders were assessed by the method developed by China Rehabilitation Research Center. Results Before treatment, there was no significant difference on error sounds between the conventional home rehabilitation group and the Wechat Mini Program group (t=0.72, P=0.48).After 8 weeks of treatment, the error sounds of the two groups of children significantly improved (t=10.73, 15.74P<0.01).Moreover, the error syllables were significantly reduced in the family WeChat mini-program group compared with the conventional home rehabilitation group (t=0.37, P<0.05). Conclusion Family rehabilitation Wechat program can better improve the mispronunciation of children with functional dysarthria.
关键词
功能性构音障碍 /
微信 /
小程序 /
康复
Key words
functional dysarthria /
Wechat /
small procedures /
rehabilitation
{{custom_sec.title}}
{{custom_sec.title}}
{{custom_sec.content}}
参考文献
[1] 李胜利.语言治疗学[M].2版.北京:人民卫生出版社, 2013:138-139.
[2] 杨文竹, 赵云静, 张成惠.功能性构音障碍儿童与正常儿童的音位对比式言语识别能力的研究[J].中国儿童保健杂志, 2015, 23(10):1027-1029, 1033.
[3] 江茹, 赵生全, 张铁松, 等.功能性构音障碍儿童言语异常及矫治效果研究[J].听力学及言语疾病杂志, 2011, 19(3):260-262.
[4] 蒋黎艳.感觉统合训练结合语音训练治疗儿童功能性构音障碍的疗效分析[J].中华物理医学与康复杂志, 2018, 40(1):55-57.
[5] 马秋艳.言语治疗联合家庭训练治疗功能性构音障碍28例疗效观察[J].中国中西医结合儿科学, 2014, 6(6):522-523.
[6] 李青青, 孙爱军, 张娟娟, 等.22例功能性构音障碍儿童言语矫治的疗效研究[J].中国听力语言康复科学杂志, 2018, 16(2):136-138.
[7] 赵云静, 孙洪伟, 麻宏伟, 等.功能性构音障碍的临床共患病调查及行为问题研究[J].中国当代儿科杂志, 2009, 11(3):225-228.
[8] Quan M, Zhang H, Zhang J, et al.Preschoolers' technology-assessed physical activity and cognitive function:a Cross-sectional study[J].J Clin Med, 2018, 7(5):108.
[9] 张文婧, 陈仁吉.173例功能性构音障碍患者辅音错误特点分析[J].北京口腔医学, 2016, 24(1):29-31.
[10] 王慧, 鲍毓, 徐琳, 等.儿童功能性构音障碍的临床分析及言语治疗[J].中华物理医学与康复杂志, 2011, 33(11):835-838.
[11] 桑晨.微信交往的主体性分析[D].西安:长安大学, 2017.
基金
上海市科委科研基金项目(13DZ1941604);上海市卫生计生系统重要薄弱学科建设(2015ZB0402);上海交通大学医工(理)交叉基金(ZH2018QNA32)