目的 调查分析不同分娩状态对学龄前儿童体质的影响。方法 通过分层整群随机抽样的方法,选取3~6岁学龄前儿童3 240例,调查昆山市学龄前儿童体质现况;同时进行问卷调查,包括研究对象的性别、年级、分娩状态等,采用多重线性回归分析不同分娩状态对学龄前儿童体质的影响。结果 本次研究共纳入研究对象3 240例,其体质测试的综合评分(25.28±4.63)分,其中男童的综合评分(24.44±4.64)分低于女童(26.16±4.45)分,差异有统计学意义(t=-10.78,P<0.001);小班[(24.25±4.64)]分的综合评分低于中班(25.38±4.54)分和大班(26.04±4.55)分(F＝40.52,P<0.001)。多重线性回归分析结果发现,控制了年级和性别的影响后,与顺产组相比,剖宫产对综合评分的影响差异无统计学意义(P＝0.281);与足月产相比,早产会使儿童的体质综合评分降低1.08分(P<0.001),而过期产对综合评分的影响尚无统计学意义(P=0.678)。结论 早产会降低学龄前儿童的体质水平。
Abstract
Objective To analyze the influence of different delivery status on preschool children′s physical fitness. Methods A total of 3 240 preschool children aged 3 to 6 years in Kunshan city were enrolled in this study through cluster sampling method.Children were surveyed about physical fitness and their delivery status.Multiple linear regression was used to analyze the influence of different delivery status on preschool children′s physical fitness. Results The average score of 3 240 preschool children′s physical fitness was 25.28±4.63.The average score of the boys′ physical fitness (24.44±4.64) was lower than that of the girls′ (26.16±4.45) (t=-10.78,P＜0.001).The average physical fitness score of preschool children in low grade (24.25±4.64) was lower than that of the preschool children in middle(25.38±4.54) or high grade (26.04±4.55) (F=40.52,P＜0.001).Multiple linear regressions found that the influence of cesarean and dystocia on the preschool children′s physical fitness was not significant after adjustment for gender,grade level (P=0.281).However,prematurity could reduce the average score of preschool children′s physical fitness by 1.08 points after adjustment for gender,grade level(P＜0.001),while post maturity had no significant influence on the average score of physical fitness(P=0.678). Conclusion Prematurity could have impact on preschool school children′s physical fitness.
关键词
学龄前儿童 /
体质 /
分娩方式 /
分娩孕周
Key words
preschool school children /
physical fitness /
delivery way /
gestational week
{{custom_sec.title}}
{{custom_sec.title}}
{{custom_sec.content}}
参考文献
[1] Abbas S,Mughal S,Hussain SNF,et al.Blood transfusion and high-order cesarean delivery;Report from a developing country[J].Pak J Med Sci,2019,35(6):1520-1525.
[2] 陈云晓.长江中下游4市学龄前儿童哮喘与剖宫产的关联性研究[D]:合肥:安徽医科大学,2017.3.
[3] Khalaf SYA,Oneill SM,O Keeffe LM,et al.The impact of obstetric mode of delivery on childhood behavior[J].Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol,2015,50(10):1557-1567.
[4] 刘婷婷,黄亮.不同分娩方式对婴幼儿生长发育状况的影响[J].中国妇幼保健,2017,32(15):3536-3539.
[5] 刘洋铭,王寒冰,漆洪波.美国妇产科医师学会早产管理指南2016年补充公告解读[J].中国实用妇科与产科杂志,2016,32(12):1189-1192.
[6] Fuentefria RDN,Silveira RC,Procianoy RS.Motor development of preterm infants assessed by the Alberta Infant Motor Scale:systematic review article[J].J Pediatr (Rio J).2017,93(4):328-342.
[7] Jarjour IT.Neurodevelopmental outcome after extreme prematurity:a review of the literature[J].Pediatr Neurol,2015,52(2):143-152.
[8] 康晓玉,李鹏,张妍,等.2009-2014年左家庄社区学龄前儿童体质状况调查[J].中国妇幼保健,2017,32(10):2180-2183.
[9] 陈捷.山西省学龄前儿童体质变化特点的研究[D].太原:中北大学,2014:42.
[10] 国家体育总局.国民体质测定标准手册:幼儿部分[S].2003:1-19.
[11] 谢幸,苟文丽.妇产科学[M].8版.北京:人民卫生出版社,2014:58-62.
[12] Zhou L,He G,Zhang J,et al.Risk factors of obesity in preschool children in an urban area in China[J].Eur J Pediatr,2011,170(11):1401-1406.
[13] Rutayisire E,Wu X,Huang K,et al.Cesarean section may increase the risk of both overweight and obesity in preschool children[J].BMC Pregnancy Childbirth,2016,16(1):338.
[14] Wang Y,Gao E,Wu J,et al.Fetal macrosomia and adolescence obesity:results from a longitudinal cohort study[J].Int J Obes (Lond),2009,33(8):923-928.
[15] 秦利,刘金萍,苟文丽.胎儿宫内行为与中枢神经系统发育的关系[J].国外医学妇幼保健分册,2003,14(5):261-263.
[16] Miller DA,Rabello YA,Paul RH.The modified biophysical profile:antepartum testing in the 1990s[J].Am J Obstet Gynecol,1996,174(3):812-817.
[17] Davidoff MJ,Dias T,Damus K,et al.Changes in the gestational age distribution among US singleton births:Impact on rates of late preterm birth,1992 to 2002[J].Semin Perinatol, 2006,30(1):8-15.
基金
昆山市科技局社会发展计划资助项目(KS18053);昆山市哲学社会科学2018年度应用研究(160)
PDF(479 KB)
