家庭环境和教养方式对小学生学业成绩的影响研究

雷晓梅, 宁宁, 刘利, 陈丽

中国儿童保健杂志 ›› 2019, Vol. 27 ›› Issue (9) : 962-966.

PDF(669 KB)
PDF(669 KB)
中国儿童保健杂志 ›› 2019, Vol. 27 ›› Issue (9) : 962-966. DOI: 10.11852/zgetbjzz2019-0968
科研论著

家庭环境和教养方式对小学生学业成绩的影响研究

  • 雷晓梅1, 宁宁1, 刘利2, 陈丽3
作者信息 +

Study on effect of family circumstance and upbringing styles on academic performance of pupil

  • LEI Xiao-mei1, NING Ning1, LIU Li2, CHEN Li3
Author information +
文章历史 +

摘要

目的 研究家庭环境和教养方式非智力因素对小学生学业成绩的影响,为促进儿童全面发展提供参考依据。方法 2016年5月采用随机整群抽样方法对陕西省关中地区两个贫困县的4所小学4~6年级学生共841人进行问卷调查。采用自制一般情况问卷获悉学生的基本情况和考试分,采用家庭教养方式问卷(Family Upbring Style Questionaire,FUSQ)对学生的教养方式进行评估,并对教养方式与小学生学业成绩进行相关性分析。结果 家庭类型、父母文化程度、父母职业、父母关系及主要抚养人在高分组和低分组之间比较,差异有统计学意义(χ2=37.82,31.84,23.71,12.14,13.99,P<0.05或<0.001)。高分组和低分组学生在激励-惩罚、民主-独裁、理解-责备、尊重-羞辱、温情-粗暴维度得分上,差异有统计学意义(U=1.699,3.352,3.424,2.821,3.036,P<0.05或<0.01),且低分组学生得分低于高分组学生,说明低分组学生的教养方式偏消极。相关分析发现,高分组儿童的学业成绩与理解-责备、尊重-羞辱、激励-惩罚、温情-粗暴维度上教养方式得分均呈正相关(r值分别为0.645、0.345、0.404、0.357,P<0.05)。低分组学生的学业成绩与尊重-羞辱、理解-责备、民主-独裁、温情-粗暴教养方式得分呈负相关(r值分别为-0.112、-0.184、-0.131、-0.169,P<0.05)。结论 家庭环境和教养方式对小学生的学业成绩有一定影响,应为儿童创造良好的成长环境,采用积极的教养方式,提高其非智力能力,以提升小学生的学业成绩

Abstract

Objective To Study on effect of family circumstance and upbringing styles on academic performance of pupil,in order to stimulate Comprehensive child development. Methods By random sampling,841 students of grade 4-6 in two poor counties of the central Shaanxi plain were collected in May 2016.The basic information and test scores of all subjects were investigated by homemade general questionnaire.The upbringing styles was evaluated by Family Upbring Style Questionaire(FUSQ).The correlation was analysed between upbringing styles and FUSQ. Results There were differences in Family style,parents′culture level,parents′ occupation,parental relations and Principal dependant between highe-score group and low-score group(χ2=37.82,31.84,23.71,12.14,13.99,P<0.05 or <0.001).The score differences were existed in award-penalty,democracy-dictatorship,understanding-blame,respect-shame,tolerant-acolasia between highe-score group and low-score group(U=1.699,3.352,3.424,2.821,3.036,P<0.05 or <0.001),and the higher scores in highe-score group than in low-score group,and maintain negative upbringing styles in students of low-score group.The academic performances of highe-score students were positively related to understanding-blame,respect-shame,award-penalty and tolerant-acolasia(r=0.645,0.345,0.404,0.357,P<0.05).The academic performances of low-score students were negatively related to respect-shame,understanding-blame,democracy-dictatorship and tolerant-acolasia(r=-0.112,-0.184,-0.131,-0.169,P<0.05). Conclusions Family circumstance and upbringing styles effect on academic performance of pupil.Good environment for growth and positive upbringing styles should be created in order to improve non-intellectual ability and academic performance of pupil.

关键词

家庭环境 / 教养方式 / 学业成绩 / 小学生

Key words

family circumstance / upbringing styles / academic performance / pupil

引用本文

导出引用
雷晓梅, 宁宁, 刘利, 陈丽. 家庭环境和教养方式对小学生学业成绩的影响研究[J]. 中国儿童保健杂志. 2019, 27(9): 962-966 https://doi.org/10.11852/zgetbjzz2019-0968
LEI Xiao-mei, NING Ning, LIU Li, CHEN Li. Study on effect of family circumstance and upbringing styles on academic performance of pupil[J]. Chinese Journal of Child Health Care. 2019, 27(9): 962-966 https://doi.org/10.11852/zgetbjzz2019-0968
中图分类号: R749.93    B842.6   

参考文献

[1] 李强,卢尧进.学生学习成绩和学习能力影响因素的研究[D].北京:清华大学,2019.DOI:10.16783/j.cnki.nwnus.2019.03.001
[2] 管益杰.关于家庭因素与儿童问题行为关系的初步探讨[EB/OL].华夏心理,2002.http://www.psychcn.com/enpsy/200201/294932324.shtml.
[3] Maarten P,Tinne De L,Carolien VS,et al.Purposeful delay and academic achievement:a critical review of the Active Procrastination Scale[J].Learn Individ Differ,2019,73:42-45.
[4] 曾晓丹.高一学生地理学习成绩的非智力因素影响分析[J].地理教学,2017,61(16):6-10.
[5] 程灶火.家庭教养方式问卷[M]//杨玉凤.儿童发育行为心理评定量表.北京:人民卫生出版社,2016:525-527.
[6] Piñeiro I,Estévez I,Freire C,et al.The role of prior achievement as an antecedent to student homework engagement[J].Frontiers in psychology,2019.DOI:10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00140
[7] Zahid A,Muhammad A,John P.Emotional intelligence predicts academic achievement in Pakistani management students[J].Int J Mgt Edu,2019,17(2):286-293.
[8] 毕扬,黄贵英.隔代教育在家庭教育中的利弊探讨[J].科学咨询,2019,14(1):29-31.
[9] 阙攀.隔代教育的不良影响及解决对策[J].盐城师范学院学报:人文社会科学版,2011,31(2):122-124.
[10] Mekonnen M,Elina L,Hannu S.Academic achievement and self-concept of deaf and hard-of-hearing and hearing students transitioning from the first to second cycle of primary school in Ethiopia[J].Int J Inclusive Edu,2019,23(6):609-623.
[11] Moses O.Access,poverty and learning achievement for primary school leavers in Kenya: analysis of evidence from 47 counties[J].J Compar Int Educ,2019,49(1):1-15.
[12] Joergensen AC,Kjaer Urhoj S,Nybo Andersen AM.Primary school achievement and socioeconomic attainment in individuals affected by parental cancer in childhood or adolescence: a Danish nationwide register-based study[J].J Epidemiol Community Health,2018,72(11):982-989.
[13] 雷晓梅,刘利,吕晔,等.小学高年级学生焦虑障碍与父母教养方式的相关分析[J].中国儿童保健杂志,2016,24(12):1249-1252,1256.

基金

陕西省自然科学基础研究计划一般项目(面上)(2019JM-002);陕西省软科学研究计划项目—面上项目(2016KRM104)

PDF(669 KB)

Accesses

Citation

Detail

段落导航
相关文章

/