目的 分析不同类型和年龄的脑瘫儿童和青少年的粗大运动功能、手功能及沟通功能受损情况及三大功能之间的相互关系,为临床制定康复干预目标和计划提供更多依据。方法 2018年1月-2019年3月应用中文版脑瘫粗大运动功能分级系统-扩展和修订版(GMFCS-ER)、中文版Mini手功能分级系统(Mini-MACS)及中文版MACS、中文版沟通功能分级系统(CFCS)对119例2~18岁脑瘫儿童和青少年进行粗大运动功能、手功能、沟通能力进行评定分级。结果 63.9%的儿童和青少年GMFCS分级和54.7%儿童和青少年CFCS分级处于Ⅰ级和Ⅱ级,52.9%的MACS分级为Ⅱ级和Ⅲ级,偏瘫患儿的三种功能大多集中在Ⅰ~Ⅲ级;119名对象中有22名 (18.5%)三种功能分级水平相同;三种功能分级间具有中等程度相关性(r=0.62~0.70,P<0.001)。结论 三个分级系统是相互补充且相互影响,仅使用一个功能分级系统并不能十分贴切地描述脑瘫儿童和青少年的整体活动功能状态。
Abstract
Objective To analyze the relationship between gross motor function, operation function and communication function impairment and three major functions of children and adolescents with different types and age,in oroler to proviole reference for making rehabilitation strategies. Methods The Chinese version of the cerebral palsy Gross Motor Function Classification System extended and revised version (GMFCS-ER), the Chinese version of mini-MACS and the Chinese version of Manual Ability Classification System (MACS), the Chinese version of Communication Function Classification System (CFCS) were used to perform gross motor function on 119 children and adolescents with cerebral palsy aged 2 to 18 years old.Hand function and communication ability were evaluated and graded. Results 63.9% of children and adolescents had a GMFCS grade and 54.7% had grade Ⅰ and Ⅱ CFCS,52.9% of grades were graded Ⅱ and Ⅲ, and most of the three functions of children with hemiplegia grade Ⅰ-Ⅲ.22 of the 119 subjects (18.5%) had the same levels of three functional grades.Three functional grades had a moderate correlation in assessing children with cerebral palsy (r=0.62-0.70, P<0.001). Conclusions The three grading systems complement each other and influence each other.The use of only one functional grading system does not describe the overall functional status of children and adolescents with cerebral palsy.
关键词
脑瘫 /
粗大运动 /
手功能 /
沟通功能 /
分级
Key words
cerebral palsy /
gross exercise /
hand function /
communication function /
grade
{{custom_sec.title}}
{{custom_sec.title}}
{{custom_sec.content}}
参考文献
[1] Schiariti V, Tatla S, Sauve K, et al.Toolbox of multiple-item measures aligning with the ICF Core Sets for children and youth with cerebral palsy[J].Eur J Paediatr Neuro,2017,21(2):252-263.
[2] 史惟, 王素娟, 杨红, 等.中文版脑瘫儿童粗大运动功能分级系统的信度和效度研究[J].中国循证儿科杂志,2006,1(2):122-129.
[3] Shi W, Yang H, Li C, et al.Expanded and revised gross motor function classification system:study for Chinese school children with cerebral palsy[J].Disabil Rehabil,2014,36(5):403-408.
[4] 史惟, 李惠, 苏怡, 等.中文版脑瘫患儿手功能分级系统的信度和效度研究[J].中国循证儿科杂志,2009,4(3):263-269.
[5] 陆恺, 史惟, 翟淳, 等.复旦中文版脑瘫幼儿手功能分级系统的信度和效度研究[J].中国循证儿科杂志,2017,12(6):410-415.
[6] 王燕娜, 史惟.复旦中文版沟通功能分级系统的信度和效度研究[J].中国循证儿科杂志,2017,12(5):321-327.
[7] 汤加利, 史惟, 郭金颖,等.学龄期脑瘫患儿日常生活活动能力状况及影响因素分析[J].中国康复医学杂志,2014,29(6):552-556.
[8] D′Aquino D, Moussa AA, Ammar A, et al.Selective dorsal rhizotomy for the treatment of severe spastic cerebral palsy:efficacy and therapeutic durability in GMFCS grade Ⅳ and Ⅴ children[J].Acta Neurochirurgica,2018,160(4):811-821.
[9] Kim IS, Park D,Ko JY, et al.Are seating systems with a medial knee support really helpful for hip displacement in children with spastic cerebral palsy gmfcs Ⅳ and V?[J].Arch Phys med Rehab,2019,100(2):247-253.
[10] Elze MC, Gimeno H, Tustin K, et al.Burke-Fahn-Marsden dystonia severity, Gross motor, manual ability, and communication function classification scales in childhood hyperkinetic movement disorders including cerebral palsy:a 'Rosetta Stone'study[J].Dev Med Child Neurol,2016,58(2):145-153.
[11] Hidecker M, Ho N, Dodge N.Inter-relationships of functional status in cerebral palsy:analyzinggross motor function, manual ability, and communication function classification systems in children[J].Dev Med Child Neurol,2012,54:737-742.
[12] 史惟, 杨红, 施炳培,等.国内外脑性瘫痪定义、临床分型及功能分级新进展[J].中国康复理论与实践,2009,15(9):801-803.
[13] 中国康复医学会儿童康复专业委员会.中国脑性瘫痪康复指南(2015):第一部分[J].中国康复医学杂志,2015,30(7):747-754.
[14] 史惟, 丁俊杰, 杨红, 等.痉挛型偏瘫儿童上肢精细运动功能发育进程研究[J].中国循证儿科杂志,2013,8(4):247-251.
[15] 史惟,王素娟.脑性瘫痪儿童运动功能与生存质量之间的相关性分析[J].中国康复医学杂志,2016,31(1):35-40.
基金
上海市宝山区科学技术委员会科技创新专项资金项目(16-E-29)