全身运动质量评估联合Dubowitz神经学检查在窒息早产儿神经发育评估中的应用

马艳艳, 申飞飞, 李海英, 索桂海, 吴尤佳

中国儿童保健杂志 ›› 2020, Vol. 28 ›› Issue (4) : 443-446.

PDF(564 KB)
PDF(564 KB)
中国儿童保健杂志 ›› 2020, Vol. 28 ›› Issue (4) : 443-446. DOI: 10.11852/zgetbjzz2019-0656
临床研究与分析

全身运动质量评估联合Dubowitz神经学检查在窒息早产儿神经发育评估中的应用

  • 马艳艳1, 申飞飞2, 李海英2, 索桂海2, 吴尤佳2
作者信息 +

Application of general movements combined with Dubowitz neurological examination in evaluating neurodevelopmental outcomes of premature asphyxiated infants

  • MA Yan-yan1, SHEN Fei-fei2, LI Hai-ying2, SUO Gui-hai2, WU You-jia2
Author information +
文章历史 +

摘要

目的 分析全身运动质量评估(GMs)联合Dubowitz神经学检查在窒息早产儿神经发育评估中的应用价值。方法 选取2017年2月-2018年3月在南通大学附属医院新生儿病房治疗的60例窒息早产儿为研究对象,根据2012年早产儿脑损伤专家共识将研究对象分为脑损伤组(n=28)、非脑损伤组(n=32),分别于生后7 d内(至少2次)、纠正胎龄满40周行Dubowitz神经学检查,在足月前阶段、扭动运动阶段以及不安运动阶段行GMs的初筛和复筛,在纠正胎龄3个月、6个月及12个月时行婴幼儿智能发育量表测定(CDCC)。分析GMs联合Dubowitz神经学检查在窒息早产儿脑损伤中的早期诊断价值及与CDCC的相关性。结果 1)GMs联合Dubowitz神经学检查预测窒息早产儿脑损伤的灵敏度为96.43%,特异度为84.38%。2)GMs联合Dubowitz对早产儿脑损伤的筛查阳性率与纠正胎龄满3个月、6个月、12个月时CDCC(PDI、MDI)评分均具有正相关性(r=0.71、0.66;0.67、0.59;0.73、0.71),其中与12个月CDCC相关性最强。结论 GMs联合Dubowitz神经学检查可作为窒息早产儿脑损伤早期诊断的有效手段。

Abstract

Objective To analyze the application value of general movements(GMs) combined with Dubowitz neurological examination in the evaluation of neurodevelopment in asphyxiated premature infants. Methods A total of 60 premature asphyxiated infants treated in the neonatal ward of the Affiliated Hospital of Nantong University from February 2017 to March 2018 were enrolled in the study,and were divided into brain injury group(n=28) and non-brain injury group(n=32)according to the consensus of experts on brain injury of premature infants in 2012. Dubowitz neurological examination was performed at least twice within 7 days after birth and 40 weeks after correcting gestational age. GMs screening and re-screening were performed in the pre-term stage,writhing movements stage and fidgety movements stage.Children′s Developmental Center of China(CDCC) was conducted at the corrected age of 3,6 and 12 months old.The early diagnostic value of GMs combined with Dubowitz neurological examination in brain injury of premature infants with asphyxia and its correlation with CDCC were analyzed. Results 1)The sensitivity and specificity of GMs combined with Dubowitz neurological examination in predicting brain injury in premature infants with asphyxia were 96.43% and 84.38%,respectively. 2)The positive rate of GMs combined with Dubowitz in screening for brain injury in premature infants was positively correlated with the CDCC(PDI、MDI) score at 3,6 and 12 months of gestational age (r=0.71,0.66;0.67,0.59;0.73,0.71),and the correlation was the strongest at 12 months. Conclusion GMs combined with Dubowitz neurological examination can be used as an effective means for early diagnosis of brain injury in premature infants with asphyxia.

关键词

全身运动质量评估 / Dubowitz神经学检查 / 窒息 / 早产儿 / 脑损伤

Key words

general movements / Dubowitz neurological examination / asphyxia / premature infants / brain injury

引用本文

导出引用
马艳艳, 申飞飞, 李海英, 索桂海, 吴尤佳. 全身运动质量评估联合Dubowitz神经学检查在窒息早产儿神经发育评估中的应用[J]. 中国儿童保健杂志. 2020, 28(4): 443-446 https://doi.org/10.11852/zgetbjzz2019-0656
MA Yan-yan, SHEN Fei-fei, LI Hai-ying, SUO Gui-hai, WU You-jia. Application of general movements combined with Dubowitz neurological examination in evaluating neurodevelopmental outcomes of premature asphyxiated infants[J]. Chinese Journal of Child Health Care. 2020, 28(4): 443-446 https://doi.org/10.11852/zgetbjzz2019-0656
中图分类号: R722.6   

参考文献

[1] 刘俊燕,熊涛,冯虹,等.新生儿窒息多器官功能损害的危险因素分析[J].中国当代儿科杂志,2011,13(12):940-943.
[2] Einspieler C,Bos AF,Libertus ME,et al.The general movement assessment helps us to identify preterm infants at risk for cognitive dysfunction[J].Fron Psychol,2016,7:406.
[3] 李明.早产与足月新生儿神经学评估[M].北京:北京大学医学出版社,2016.
[4] Setänen S,Lahti K,Lehtonen L,et al.Neurological examination combined with brain MRI or cranial US improves prediction of neurologicaloutcome in preterm infants[J].Early Hum Dev,2014,90(12):851-856.
[5] 中国医师协会新生儿专业委员会.早产儿脑损伤诊断与防治专家共识[J].中国当代儿科杂志,2012,14(12):883-884.
[6] Epelman M,Daneman A,Chauvin N,et al.Head ultrasound and MR imaging in the evaluation of neonatal encephalopathy:competitive or complementary imaging studies?[J].Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am,2012,20(1):93-115.
[7] SkiÖld B,Eriksson C,Eliasson AC,et al.General movements and magnetic resonance imaging in the prediction of neuromotor outcome in children born extremely preterm[J].Early Hum Dev,2013,89(7):467-472.
[8] Tomantschger I,Herrero D,Einspieler C,et al.The general movement assessment in non-European low- and middle-income countries[J].Rev Saude Publica,2018,52:6.
[9] Dubowitz LM,Dubowitz V,Palmer P,et al.A new approach to the neurological assessment of the preterm and full-term newborn infant[J].Brain Dev,1980,2(1):3-14.
[10] Molteno C,Grosz P,Wallace P.Neurological examination of the preterm and full-term infant at risk for developmental disabilities using the Dubowitz Neurological Assessment[J].Early Hum Dev,1995,41:167-176.
[11] 李宁,贾飞勇,杜琳.全身运动质量评估:超早期预测早产儿神经发育结局的可靠工具[J].中国当代儿科杂志,2013,15(4):317-320.
[12] Wusthoff CJ.How to use:the neonatal neurological examination[J].Arch Dis Child Educ Pract Ed,2013,98(4):148-153.

基金

江苏省妇幼健康科研项目基金(F201853、F201649);南通市卫健委科研课题(QA2019059)

PDF(564 KB)

Accesses

Citation

Detail

段落导航
相关文章

/