目的 比较Alberta婴儿运动量表(AIMS)在早产儿运动发育评估中的应用价值,为改善早产儿预后提供参考依据。方法 选取2018年1-12月间在宁夏医科大学总医院就诊的1～15月龄婴幼儿182例,分为观察组(早产儿组,98例)与对照组(足月儿组,84例),根据AIMS评估结果进行早期干预。3个月后再次对两组给予AIMS评估。结果 两组婴幼儿干预后比较:各体位AIMS评分和AIMS总分差异均有统计学意义(t=4.097、5.315、4.802、2.334、5.083,P＜0.05或＜0.001),而AIMS百分位数比较差异无统计学意义(P=0.664)。结论 AIMS可评估早产儿运动发育状况,并根据评估结果制定早期干预方案,可在临床推广。
Abstract
Objective To compare the application value of Alberta Infant Motor Scale (AIMS) in the early intervention between preterm and full-term infants. Methods A total of 182 infants aged 1 to 15 months were selected from the General Hospital of Ningxia Medical University from January to December 2018 and were divided into observation group(premature infant group,98 cases) and control group (full-term infant group,84 cases).According to AIMS evaluation results,early intervention was conducted.The two groups were evaluated again after 3-month early intervention by AIMS. Results There were significant differences between the two groups on AIMS scores of each position and total AIMS scores training(t=4.097,5.315,4.802,2.334,5.083,P＜0.05 or ＜0.001).There were no statistically significant difference between the two groups on AIMS percentiles after 3-month treatment(P=0.664). Conclusion AIMS plays acrucial rule in assessing the motor development of preterm infants and the early intervention programs can be made according to the assessmen result,So that it can be popularized in clinic.
关键词
Alberta婴儿运动量表 /
早产儿 /
早期干预
Key words
Alberta Infant Motor Scale /
preterm infants /
early intervention
{{custom_sec.title}}
{{custom_sec.title}}
{{custom_sec.content}}
参考文献
[1] 胡亚美,江载芳.诸福棠实用儿科学[M].7版.北京:人民卫生出版社,2012:409.
[2] World Health Organization.Born too soon:the global action reporton pretermbirth[R].Geneva:WHO,2012.http://apps.who.int/iris/handle/10665/44864#sthash.178nch Cn.dpuf.
[3] Johnson S,Evans TA,Draper ES,et al.Neurodevelopmental outcomes following late and moderate prematurity:a population-based cohort study[J].Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed,2015,100(4):301-308.
[4] Woythaler MA,McCormick MC,Smith VC.Late preterm infants have worse 24-month neurodevelopmental outcomes than term infants[J].Pediatrics,2011,127(3):e622-629.
[5] 王清清,苏卫东,黄育丹,等.晚期早产儿早期智能发育及其影响因素研究[J].中国新生儿科杂志,2016,31(1):9-13. [6] 梁秋雁,张盘德,杨杰华,等.高危脑瘫婴幼儿早期康复干预对运动功能的影响[J].中国康复医学杂志,2009,24(12):1137-1139.
[7] 王桂芝,陈燕惠,曾仁和.新生儿缺血缺氧性脑病早期干预效果评估[J].中国康复医学杂志,2010,25(8):747-750.
[8] 王翠,黄真.Alberta婴儿运动量表[J].中国康复医学杂志,2009,24(9):858-861.
[9] Piper MC,Darrah J,黄真,等.发育中婴儿的运动评估-Alberta婴儿运动量表[M].北京:北京大学医学出版社,2015:163-174.
[10] 王翠,李一芳,黄真,等.Alberta婴儿运动量表的效度研究[J].中国康复医学杂志,2018,33(1):55-58.
[11] 王玮,王翠,席宇诚,等.Alberta婴儿运动量表在高危儿中的信度研究[J].中国康复医学杂志,2012,27(10):913-916.
[12] 王翠,席宇诚,黄真,等.Alberta婴儿运动量表在正常婴儿中的信度研究[J].中国康复医学杂志,2009,24(9):896-899.
[13] Albuquerque PL,Mqf G,Lima MC,et al.Concurrent validity of the Alberta Infant Motor Scale to detect delayed gross motor development in preterm infants:A comparative study with the Baley Ⅲ[J].Dev Neurorehabil,2017,21(1):134-135.
[14] Lipkind HS,Slopen ME,Pfeiffer MR,et al.School-age outcomes of late preterm infants in New York city[J].Am J Obstet Gynecol,2012,206(222):e1-e6.
[15] Murray E,Fernandes M,Fazel M,et al.Differential effect of intrauterine growth restriction on childhood neurodevelopment:a systematic review[J].BJOG,2015,122(8):1062-1072.
[16] 殷张华,钱继红,王蓓,等.晚期早产儿近期并发症及智能发育前瞻性研究[J].中国新生儿杂志,2015,30(2):112-116.
[17] Kerstjens JM,De Winer AF,Bocca-Tjeertes IF,et al.Developmental delay in moderately preterm-born children at school entry[J].J Pediatr,2011,159(1):92-98.
[18] Novak L,Morgan C,Adde L,et al.Early,accurate diagnosis and early intervention in cerebral palsy,advances in diagnosis and treatment[J].JAMA Pediatr,2017,171(9):987-907.
[19] 黄真.婴幼儿脑性瘫痪:目标性活动优化早期生长和发育[M].北京:北京大学医学出版社,2016.
[20] 李晓捷.人体发育学[M].北京:人民卫生出版社,2014:1-23.
[21] 王翠,李一芳,黄真,等.Alberta婴儿运动量表与Peabody粗大运动发育量表在高危儿中的预测能力研究[J].中国康复医学杂志,2019,34(3):293-296.
[22] Piper MC,Darrah J.Motor assessment of the developing infant[M].Alberta:Saunders,1994.
[23] 黄真,杨红,陈翔,等.高危儿评定与干预:中国脑性瘫痪康复指南(2015)第二部分[J].中国康复医学杂志,2015,30(8):858-866.
PDF(516 KB)
