双水平正压通气在早产儿呼吸支持中的应用进展

张慧杰; 温晓红

doi:10.11852/zgetbjzz2018-26-08-13

PDF(485 KB)

中国儿童保健杂志 ›› 2018, Vol. 26 ›› Issue (8) : 858-861. DOI: 10.11852/zgetbjzz2018-26-08-13

综述与讲座

双水平正压通气在早产儿呼吸支持中的应用进展

张慧杰, 温晓红

作者信息 +

Progress on application of bi-level continuous positive airway pressure in respiratory support of premature infants

ZHANG Hui-jie, WEN Xiao-hong

Author information +

文章历史 +

摘要

呼吸系统疾病是早产儿最常见的疾病,部分早产儿生后需要呼吸支持,其方法多样。现今,在其治疗效果上更加注重减少并发症,尤其是支气管肺发育不良等慢性肺疾病对早产儿生存质量的影响。无创通气在治疗早产儿呼吸系统疾病的疗效得到肯定,本文就双水平气道正压通气近几年应用于早产儿呼吸系统疾病进行综述。

Abstract

Respiratory diseases are the most common in preterm infants,some need respiratory support with various treatment methods after birth.Nowadays, more attention is paid to reduce complications in its treatment, especially chronic lung disease like bronchopulmonary dysplasia, and the impact on quality of the life of premature infants.The efficacy of non-invasive ventilation in the treatment of respiratory diseases of premature infants is confirmed.This review summarizes the application of bi-level positive airway pressure ventilation in premature infants with respiratory diseases in recent years.

导出引用

张慧杰, 温晓红. 双水平正压通气在早产儿呼吸支持中的应用进展[J]. 中国儿童保健杂志. 2018, 26(8): 858-861 https://doi.org/10.11852/zgetbjzz2018-26-08-13

ZHANG Hui-jie, WEN Xiao-hong. Progress on application of bi-level continuous positive airway pressure in respiratory support of premature infants[J]. Chinese Journal of Child Health Care. 2018, 26(8): 858-861 https://doi.org/10.11852/zgetbjzz2018-26-08-13

中图分类号： R179

参考文献

[1] Jeon GW.Respiratory support with heated humidified high flow nasal cannula in preterm infants[J].KJP, 2016, 59(10):389-394.
[2] Fischer HS, Bührer C.Avoiding endotracheal ventilation to prevent bronchopul-monary dysplasia:a meta-analysis[J].Pediatr, 2013, 132(5):1351-1360.
[3] O′ Brien K, Campbell C, Brown L, et al.Infant flow biphasic nasal continuous positive airway pressure (BP- NCPAP) vsinfant flow NCPAP for the facilitation of extubation in infants′ ≤ 1,250 grams:a randomized controlled trial[J].BMC Pediatr, 2012, 12(1):43.
[4] Sunbul FS, Fink JB, Robert H, et al.Comparison of HFNC,bubble CPAP and SiPAP on aerosol delivery in neonates:an in-vitro study[J].Pediatr Pulmonol, 2015, 50(11):1099-1106.
[5] Zhou B, Zhai JF, Jiang HX, et al.Usefulness of DuoPAP in the treatment of very low birth weight preterm infants with neonatal respiratory distress syndrome[J].Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci, 2015, 19(4):573-577.
[6] Lampland AL, Plumm B, Worwa C, et al.Bi-level CPAP does not improve gas exchange when compared with conventional CPAP for the treatment of neonates recovering from respiratory distress syndrome[J].Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed, 2015, 100(1):31-35.
[7] Roberts CT, Davis PG, Owen LS.Neonatal non-invasive respiratory support:synchronised NIPPV,non-synchronised NIPPV or bi-level CPAP:what is the evidence in 2013[J].Neonatology, 2013, 104(3):203-209.
[8] Solevg AL, Kann IC.N-BiPAP treatment in infants with respiratory distress syndrome:a population study[J].Early hum dev, 2015, 91(10):577-581.
[9] Salvo V, Lista G, Lupo E, et al.Noninvasive ventilation strategies for early treatment of RDS in preterm infants:an RCT[J].Pediatr, 2015, 135(3):444-451.
[10] Sweet DG, Carnielli V, Greisen G, et al.European consensus guidelines on the management of respiratory distress syndrome-2016 update[J].Neonatology, 2017, 111(2):107-125.
[11] McAdams RM, Hedstrom AB, DiBlasi RM, et al.Implementation of bubble CPAP in a rural Ugandan neonatal ICU[J].Respir Care, 2015, 60(3):437-445.
[12] Lista G, Castoldi F, Fontana P, et al.Nasal continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) versus bi-level nasal CPAP in preterm babies with respiratory distress syndrome:a randomised control trial[J].Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed, 2010, 95(2):85-89.
[13] 唐玉英, 李涛, 付生军, 等.双水平正压通气和经鼻持续气道正压通气治疗早产儿呼吸窘迫综合征的疗效和并发症分析[J].中国循证儿科杂志, 2014, 9(4):288-293.
[14] Dargaville PA, Aiyappan A, De Paoli AG, et al.Minimally-invasive surfactant therapy in preterm infants on continuous positive airway pressure[J].Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed, 2013, 98(2):122-126.
[15] Garib M, Salama N, Deraz S.Early versus late extubation after surfactant replacement therapy for respiratory distress syndrome[J].Egypt Pediatr Ass Gazette, 2015, 63(1):1-5.
[16] Sweet D, Bevilacqua G, Carnielli V, et al.European consensus guidelines on the management of neonatal respiratory distress syndrome[J].Neonatology, 2014, 52(10):749-755.
[17] Sadeghnia A, Barekateyn B, Badiei Z, et al.Analysis and comparison of the effects of N-BiPAP and Bubble-CPAP in treatment of preterm newborns with the weight of below 1500 grams affiliated with respiratory distress syndrome:a randomised clinical trial[J].Adv Biomed Res, 2016, 5:3.
[18] Morton SU, Smith VC.Treatment options for apnoea of prematurity[J].Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed, 2016, 101(4):212-225.
[19] Ishihara C, Ibara S, Ohsone Y, et al.Effects of infant flow Bi-NCPAP on apnea of prematurity[J].Pediatr Int, 2016, 58(6):456-460.
[20] Shah PS, Sankaran K, Aziz K, et al.Outcomes of preterm infants 29 weeks gestation over 10-year period in Canada:a cause for concern[J].J Perinatol, 2012, 32(2):132-132.
[21] Manley BJ, Doyle LW, Owen LS, et al.extubating extremely preterm infants:predictors of success and outcomes following failure[J].Pediatr, 2016, 173:45-49.
[22] Thomas PE, LeFlore J.Extubation success in premature infants with respiratory distress syndrome treated with bi-level nasal continuous positive airway pressure versus nasal intermittent positive pressure ventilation[J].J Perinat Neonatal Nurs, 2013, 27(4):328-334.
[23] Macedo TAI.Nasal bilevel versus continuous positive airway pressure in preterm infants:a randomized controlled trial[J].Clin Trials, 2015, 5:3.
[24] Garg S, Sinha S.Non-invasive ventilation in premature infants:based on evidence or habit[J].J Clin Neonatol, 2013, 2(4):155-159.
[25] Meneses J, Bhandari V, Alves JG.Nasal intermittent positive pressure ventilation vs nasal continuou spositive airway pressure for preterm infants with respiratory distress syndrome:a system atic review and meta-analysis[J].Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med, 2012, 166(4):372-376.
[26] Ricotti A, Salvo V, Zimmermann LJI, et al.N-SIPPV versus bi-level N-CPAP for early treatment of respiratory distress syndrome in preterm infants[J].Matern Fetal Neonatal Med, 2013, 26(13):1346-1351.
[27] Millar D, Lemyre B, Kirpalani H, et al.A comparison of bilevel and ventilator-delivered non-invasive respiratory support[J].Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed,2016,101(1):21-25.