摘要
目的 了解城市留守小学生与非留守小学生焦虑、抑郁和焦虑抑郁共患状况,并研究监护人焦虑、抑郁,亲子依恋,生活质量和安全感对其的影响。 方法 2016年6-9月选取前期初筛的城市留守儿童89人,并按1∶1配对设立对照组,对两组进行问卷调查。问卷内容包括:一般情况、儿童焦虑性情绪障碍筛查表、儿童抑郁量表、儿童焦虑和抑郁问卷、儿少主观生活质量问卷、亲子依恋量表、安全感量表、家长焦虑自评问卷、家长抑郁自评问卷。 结果 1)留守组和对照组小学生焦虑检出率(43.2% vs.32.1%,χ2=2.023,P=0.155)、共患检出率(22.2% vs. 17.3%,χ2=0.314,P=0.575)比较差异都无统计学意义。留守组和对照组小学生抑郁检出率比较,差异有统计学意义(25.9% vs. 13.6%,χ2=6.261,P=0.012)。2)留守组小学生焦虑、抑郁和共患与家庭生活、同伴交往、学校生活、躯体情感、认知成分、情感成分呈显著负相关(P<0.05),同时焦虑和抑郁还与人际安全感和确定控制感呈显著负相关(P<0.05);对照组小学生的焦虑、抑郁和共患均与同伴交往、学校生活、躯体情感、认知成分和情感成分、人际安全感、确定控制感呈负相关(P<0.05),除此之外焦虑和抑郁分别与学校生活和家庭生活呈显著负相关(P<0.05)。3)留守组小学生情感成分对焦虑、抑郁和共患的回归系数分别为-0.42、-0.173、-0.515;对照组小学生,情感成分对抑郁和共患的回归系数分别为-0.134、-3.252,学校生活对共患的回归系数为-3.998。 结论 城市留守小学生的焦虑、抑郁和共患情况较非留守小学生严重,生活质量、亲子依恋、安全感等均会对其产生一定影响,应引起广泛关注。
Abstract
Objective To investigate the prevalence of anxiety, depression, comorbity anxiety and depression among urban left-behind pupils and normal pupils, and to study the influence of attachment, subjective life quality, sense of security, as well as guardians' anxiety and depression. Methods Previously, 89 left-behind children in city were selected from June to September 2016, and control group were chose by 1∶1 matching control group. A questionnaire survey was conducted in two groups. The contents of the questionnaire included general information, Scale of Anxiety Related Emotional Disorders (SCARED), Children's Depression Inventory (CDI) and Revised Children's Anxiety and Depression Scale (RCADS), and so on. Results 1) The anxiety(43.2% vs.32.1%,χ2=2.023,P=0.155)and comorbidity(22.2% vs.17.3%,χ2=0.314,P=0.575)rates of the two groups had no significant difference. But the depression rates of the two groups were significantly different(25.9% vs.13.6%,χ2=6.261,P=0.012). 2) The left-behind students' comorbity anxiety and depression was negatively correlated with the family life, peer interaction, school life, somatic emotion , cognitive and emotional component(P<0.05).At the same time, anxiety and depression were negatively related to interpersonal sense of security and certainty in control (P<0.05); Anxiety, depression and comorbid anxiety and depression in pupils in control group were negatively correlated with peer interaction, school life, physical and emotional, emotional and cognitive component elements, interpersonal safety, determine the sense of control was negatively correlated (P<0.05). In addition, anxiety and depression respectively had negative correlation with school and family life (P<0.05). 3)The regression coefficient of left-behind pupils' affective components on anxiety, depression and comorbid anxiety and depression were-0.42,-0.173 and-0.515,respectively. The regression coefficient of control group pupils' affective components on depression and comorbid anxiety and depression were-0.134 and-3.252.And the regression coefficient of school life on comorbid anxiety and depression was-3.998. Conclusions The anxiety, depression and comorbidity of left-behind pupils are more serious than those of normal pupils, and quality of life, parent-child attachment and security will exert a certain influence on their psychological disturbance. Therefore left-behind pupils in urban area should be given more concern from the whole society.
关键词
城市留守小学生 /
焦虑 /
抑郁 /
焦虑抑郁共患 /
影响因素
Key words
urban left-behind pupils /
anxiety /
depression /
comorbity anxiety and depression /
influencing factors
崔晶, 辛志宇, 马龙, 王哲, 王苗, 王忆军.
哈尔滨市留守与非留守小学生焦虑、抑郁和共患情况及其影响因素调查[J]. 中国儿童保健杂志. 2018, 26(7): 758-761 https://doi.org/10.11852/zgetbjzz2018-26-07-17
CUI jing, XIN Zhi-yu, MA Long, WANG Zhe, WANG Miao, WANG Yi-jun.
Investigation of anxiety, depression and comorbidity among left-behind primary school pupils and normal pupils in Harbin[J]. Chinese Journal of Child Health Care. 2018, 26(7): 758-761 https://doi.org/10.11852/zgetbjzz2018-26-07-17
{{custom_sec.title}}
{{custom_sec.title}}
{{custom_sec.content}}
参考文献
[1] 姜威.城市留守儿童行为问题的社会个案工法介入[J]. 社会法制,2013, 529(19):82.
[2] 雷海玲,杨海.网络环境下城市留守儿童心理问题研究[J]. 教育教学论坛,2014,48(1):5-6.
[3] 李建军.青少年自杀行为的低龄化问题研究[J].贵州大学学报:社科版,2006,24(6):70-72.
[4] 王凯,苏林雁,朱焱,等.儿童焦虑性情绪障碍筛查表的中国城市常模[J].中国临床心理学杂志,2002,10(4):270- 272.
[5] Chorpita BF, Yim L, Moffitt C, et al. Assessment of symptoms of DSM-Ⅳ anxiety and depression in children: a revised child and depression scale[J]. Behaviour Research & Therapy,2000,38(8):835-855.
[6] 丛中,安莉娟.安全感量表的初步编制及信度,效度检验[J].中国心理卫生杂志,2004,18(2):97-99.
[7] 戴晓阳,张进辅,程灶火,等.常用心理评估量表手册[M].北京: 人民军医出版社,2014:218-222.
[8] 王树青,张光珍,陈会昌.大学生亲子依恋、分离-个体化与自我同一性状态之间的关系[J].济南大学学报:社科版,2012, 30(2):76-80.
[9] 张明园,精神科评定量表手册[M].长沙:湖南科学技术出版社,1993:16-19.
[10] 张莉,罗学荣,孟软何. 山西省长治市农村留守儿童情绪问题现状调查[J].中国健康教育,2010,26(2):105-107.
[11] 范方. 留守儿童焦虑/抑郁情绪的心理社会因素及心理弹性发展方案初步研究[D].长沙:中南大学, 2008.
[12] 袭开国.农村留守儿童焦虑现状及其个体差异[J].中国健康心理学杂志,2008,16(4):466-467.
[13] Schwartz D, Dodge KA, Pettit GS, et al. the conduct problems prevention research group friendship as a moderating factor in the pathway between early harsh home environment and later victimization in the peer group[J]. Dev Psychol,2000,36(5):646-662.
[14] Brumariu LE, Kerns KA. Mother-Child attachment and social anxiety symptoms in middle childhood[J]. J Appl Dev Psychol, 2008, 29(5):393-402.
[15] 王继跃,朱红,周君富,等.儿童焦虑症与不同家庭特征的对照研究[J]. 浙江大学校报:医学版,2002,31(5):371-374.