目的 建立快速自动命名和快速交替刺激测试(RAN/RAS Tests)学龄前本土化测试常模。方法 本研究通过采用随机分层抽样调查方法,利用本土化后的RAN/RAS测试对南京市区8所幼儿园的314名学龄前儿童进行调查。结果 1)314名儿童(男156名,女158名)分为4个年龄组,性别比为1∶1.01;2)不同性别测试得分差异均无统计学意义(P＞0.05);各个年龄组各个条目得分,随着年龄的增长而逐渐下降(P<0.001);3)时间信度相关系数范围为0.92~0.95,测试者重测信度相关系数范围为0.98~0.99,效度检测提示两两相关系数具有统计学意义。结论 本土化后的RAN/RAS测试各指标有着显著的年龄梯度,符合发育规律,可作为国内发展性阅读障碍的早期评估工具。
Abstract
Objective To develop norms for rapid automatized naming and rapid alternating stimulus (RAN/RAS) tests for preschool children. Methods A multi-stage sampling procedure was used to randomly select 314 primary school students aged 5~6 years for the study from 8 kindergartes in Nanjing. Results 1)A total of 314 students were randomly selected to participate in the study for 4 groups with sex ratio of 1∶1.01.2)The scores of the boys and girls did not differ significantly on any of the measures (P>0.05); the scores decreased as the age increased(P<0.001).3)Time reliability correlation coefficient ranged from 0.92 to 0.95,and retest reliability correlation coefficient ranged from 0.98 to 0.99.The validity test showed that the correlation coefficient was statistically significant. Conclusions The scores of RAN/RAS tests norms have significant age gradient and are in line with the law of development.The norms derived in this study are proposed as the norm RAN/RAS scores for preschool children.
关键词
阅读障碍 /
快速命名 /
本土化常模 /
学龄前儿童
Key words
dyslexia /
rapid automatized naming /
norm /
preschool children
{{custom_sec.title}}
{{custom_sec.title}}
{{custom_sec.content}}
参考文献
[1] 吕佳,杜盼,沈彤,等.发展性阅读障碍成因研究进展[J].中国特殊教育,2013(7):56-61.
[2] Del Tufo SN,Myers EB.Phonemic restoration in developmental dyslexia[J].Front Neurosci,2014,8(8):134.
[3] Schulte-Korne G.Specific learning disabilities from DSM-IV to DSM-5[J].Z Kinder Jugendpsychiatr Psychother,2014,42(5):369.
[4] Paracchini S,Diaz R,Stein J.Advances in dyslexia genetics-new insights into the role of brain asymmetries[J].Adv Genet,2016,96:53.
[5] 丁颖,李燕芳,邹雨晨.发展性障碍儿童的脑发育特点及干预[J].心理科学进展,2015,23(8):1398-1408.
[6] 董琼,李虹,伍新春,等.语素意识、语音意识和快速命名在学前儿童言语能力发展中的预测作用:来自追踪研究的证据[J].心理与行为研究,2014,12(2):207-211.
[7] Lyon GRE.Frames of reference for the assessment of learning disabilities:New views on measurement issues[M].Baltimore:Paul H Brookes Publishing,1994,279-332.
[8] Schiff R,Levie R.Spelling and morphology in dyslexia:A developmental study across the school years[J].Dyslexia,2017,Jan 25.Doi:10.1002/dys.1549.
[9] Yeung PS,Ho SH,Wong YK,et al.Longitudinal Predictors of Chinese word reading and spelling among elementary grade students[J].Appl Psycholinguist,2013,34(6):1245-1277.
[10] Jones MW,Snowling MJ.What automaticity deficit Activation of lexical information by readers with dyslexia in a rapid automatized naming stroop-switch task[J].J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn.2016;42(3):465-74.
[11] Moll K,Jones M.Naming fluency in dyslexic and nondyslexic readers:differential effects of visual crowding in foveal,parafoveal,and peripheral vision[J].Q J Exp Psychol,2013,66(11):2085-2091.
[12] Spring C,Capps C.Encoding speed,rehearsal,and probed recall of dyslexic boys[J].J Educ Psychol,1974,66(5):780.
[13] Wolf M.Rapid alternating stimulus naming in the developmental dyslexias[J].Brain & Language,1986,27(2):360-379.
[14] Wolf M,Bowers PG.The double-deficit hypothesis for the developmental dyslexias[J].J Educ Psychol,1999,91(3):415-438.
基金
国家自然科学基金(30801255);江苏省医学重点人才(RC2011022)
PDF(557 KB)
