目的 了解孤独症谱系障碍(ASD)与语言发育迟缓 (LR)儿童在中文版年龄与发育进程问卷(ASQ)中的表现特征及其差异,为孤独症的早期筛查与鉴别提供指导。方法 以2016年9月-2017年2月就诊于佛山市妇幼保健院与广东省妇幼保健院儿童心理门诊并确诊为ASD和LR的16~30月龄儿童为研究对象,其中ASD儿童44例,LR儿童25例。研究人员与家长共同完成ASQ-3与ASQ-SE,筛查评估两组儿童在沟通、粗大动作、精细动作、解决问题、个人-社会、社交-情绪等能区的发展水平。结果 ASD儿童在ASQ-3五大能区及ASQ-SE中的筛查不通过率均高于LR,其中大动作、精细动作、个人-社会能区的差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。调整性别、年龄等混杂因素后,ASD组在大动作(OR=2.52,95%CI:1.24~5.11)和个人-社会(OR=2.15,95%CI:1.18~3.94)能区的表现仍较LR组更差。结论 16~30月龄的ASD儿童,其大动作和个人-社会能区的发育比LR儿童更差。当存在语言发育迟缓的儿童在ASQ-3筛查中合并有大动作和个人-社会能区发育落后时,建议对其进行特异性的孤独症筛查与诊断评估。
Abstract
Objective To compare different screening results of Chinese version of the Ages and Stages Questionnaires (ASQ) between children with autism spectrum disorder (ASD) and language retardation (LR),and to provide guidance for early screening and indentification of autism. Methods A total of 44 ASD and 25 LR children aged 16～30 months with the help of researchers and parents were enrolled to finish the screening of Ages and Stages Questionnaires-Third Edition (ASQ-3) and Ages and Stages Questionnaires:Social-Emotional (ASQ-SE).The 5 domains of ASQ-3 including communication (C),gross motor (GM),fine motor (FM),solving problem (SP),personal-social (PS) and the results of ASQ-SE between two groups were compared. Results Compared with LR group,ASD group had higher proportions of failing GM,FM and PS domains (all P<0.05).Adjusted for age and sex,the performance of ASD group in GM (OR=2.52,95%CI:1.24~5.11) and PS (OR=2.15,95%CI:1.18~3.94) domain were worse than those of LR group. Conclusion Children with ASD aged 16~30 months show poorer development in gross motor and personal-social area than those in children with LR.LR children with gross motor and personal-social development delay in the screening of ASQ should be evaluated for autism.
关键词
孤独症谱系障碍 /
语言发育迟缓 /
年龄与发育进程问卷 /
筛查
Key words
autism spectrum disorder /
language retardation /
Ages and Stages Questionnaires /
screening
{{custom_sec.title}}
{{custom_sec.title}}
{{custom_sec.content}}
参考文献
[1] 静进.孤独症谱系障碍诊疗现状与展望[J].中山大学学报:医学科学版,2015,36(4):481-488.
[2] 王建敏,李侠,农铮,等.监护人重视的首个儿童孤独症异常特征及与就诊时间关系的分析[J].中华流行病学杂志,2015,36(10):1077-1080.
[3] Dale PS,Price TS,Bishop DV,et al.Outcomes of early language delay:I.Predicting persistent and transient language difficulties at 3 and 4 years[J].J Speech Lang Hear Res,2003,46(3):544-560.
[4] 黄敏施,林艳,何慧静,等.婴幼儿沟通和象征性行为发展量表应用研究[J].中国实用儿科杂志,2016,31(10):770-773.
[5] Taylor LJ,Maybery MT,Whitehouse AJ.Do children with specific language impairment have a cognitive profile reminiscent of autism? A review of the literature[J].J Autism Dev Disord,2012,42(10):2067-2083.
[6] Leyfer OT,Tager-Flusberg H,Dowd M,et al.Overlap between autism and specific language impairment:Comparison of autism diagnostic interview and autism diagnostic observation schedule scores[J].Autism Research,2008,1(5):284-296.
[7] Boucher J.Research review:Structural language in autistic spectrum disorder-characteristics and causes[J].J Child Psychol Psychiatry,2012,53(3):219-233.
[8] Esposito G,Venuti P,Maestro S,et al.An exploration of symmetry in early autism spectrum disorders:Analysis of lying[J].Brain & Development,2009,31(2):131-138.
[9] Ming X,Brimacombe M,Wagner G C.Prevalence of motor impairment in autism spectrum disorders[J].Brain & Development,2007,29(9):565-570.
[10] Bhat AN,Landa RJ,Galloway JCC.Current perspectives on motor functioning in infants,children,and aadults with autism spectrum disorders[J].Phy Ther,2011,91(7):1116-1129.
[11] 陶聪,麦坚凝,肖华,等.2～3岁语言发育迟缓儿童的智能发育分析[J].中国儿童保健杂志,2012,20(7):635-636.
[12] 静进.儿童言语及语言障碍的神经机制[J].中国儿童保健杂志,2003,12(5):323-327.
[13] 美国精神医学学会.精神障碍诊断与统计手册(第5版):DSM-5[M].北京:北京大学出版社,2015.
[14] Hosozawa M,Tanaka K,Shimizu T,et al.How children with specific language impairment view social situations:an eye tracking study[J].Pediatrics,2012,129(6):e1453-e1460.
[15] Maskey M,Warnell F,Parr JR,et al.Emotional and behavioural problems in children with autism spectrum disorder[J].J Autism Dev Disord,2013,43(4):851-859.
[16] 朱华,徐萍.2～3岁语言发育迟缓儿童亲子依恋及行为问题现状的分析[J].中国儿童保健杂志,2010,18(4):327-329.
[17] 徐亚琴,顾筱琪,池霞,等.2～3岁发育性语言障碍儿童的气质和心理行为特点探讨[J].中国儿童保健杂志,2011,19(10):884-886.
PDF(455 KB)
