目的 分析年龄与发育进程问卷在高危儿系统管理中的应用,为建立更为高效的系统管理模式提供依据。方法 将2012年3月-2013年3月出生于某社区的高危儿作为研究对象,选取125例作为高危儿观察组,使用年龄与发育进程问卷在发育关键月龄对高危儿进行筛查,在同一社区选取127名高危儿作为高危儿对照组,按照原有方式进行系统管理。在随访2年后对两组高危儿的随访率、转诊率以及与两组儿童未来生存质量有关的智能发育水平、社会-情绪进行对比分析。结果 高危儿观察组的随访率为92.8%、转诊率为43.2%,均高于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。高危儿观察组的智能发育得分(90.25±3.16),高于高危儿对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.01)。社交-情绪得分(65.91±1.03)低于高危儿对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论 将年龄与发育进程问卷用于高危儿系统管理,能提高高危儿的随访率和转诊率,提升高危儿的智能水平和社会-情绪能力,进而改善高危儿的生存质量。
Abstract
Objective To investigate the application of the ages and stages questionnaires in high-risk infants systematic management,and to provide evidences for building a more efficient system management mode. Methods A total of 252 high-risk infants who were born in a community from March 2012 to March 2013 were divided into two groups:the 125 cases who were selected as the observation group were examined by the ages and stages questionnaires in important period of the growth,the other 127 cases as a control group were examined by the original systematic management.After 2 years of follow- up,the follow-up rate,the referral rate,the intelligence development level and social-emotional level related to the future quality of life were analyzed. Results The follow-up rate of observation group was 92.8%,and the referral rate was 43.2%,which were higher than those of control group,the difference was statistically significant (P<0.05).The intelligence development level of observing group score (90.25±3.16),higher than that of high-risk infants in the control group,the difference was statistically significant (P<0.01).Social-emotional score (65.91±1.03),below the control group,the difference was statistically significant (P<0.05). Conclusion The application of the ages and stages questionnaires in of high-risk infants systematic management can improve the follow-up rate and referral rate of high-risk infants,raising the level of intelligence and social-emotional ability in high-risk infants,and then improve the quality of survival in high-risk infants.
关键词
年龄与发育进程问卷 /
高危儿 /
系统管理
Key words
Ages and Stages Questionnaires /
high-risk infants /
systematic management
{{custom_sec.title}}
{{custom_sec.title}}
{{custom_sec.content}}
参考文献
[1] O'Shea TM,Allred EN,Kuban KC,et al.Intraventricular hemorrhage and developmental outcomes at 24months of age in extremely preterm infants[J].J Child Neurol,2012,27(1):22-29.
[2] 蔡荣兰.系统干预管理对脑损伤高危儿神经发育及脑瘫发生率的影响[J].中国儿童保健杂志,2016,21(5):534-537.
[3] 姚国英,卞晓燕,SQUIRES Jane,等.年龄与发育进程问卷中文版的婴幼儿发育筛查界值标准研究[J].中华儿科杂志,2010,48(11):824-828.
[4] Squires J,Twombly E,Bricker D,et al.年龄与发育进程问卷使用指南[M].卞晓燕,陈静仪,柴臻,等.上海:上海技术出版社,2013:16-17,22. [5] Hou S,Yuan L,Jin P,et al.A clinical study of the effects of lead poisoning on the intelligence and neurobehavioral abilities of children[J].Theor Biol Med Model,2013,10(10):13-14.
[6] Li TY,Zhang X,Wei XP,et al.Impact of antioxidant vitamins and heavy metal levels at birth on neurodevelopment of children assessed at two years of age[J].Zhonghua Er Ke Za Zhi,2011,49(6):439-444.
[7] 陈宇,李晶,刘惠娟.年龄与发育进程问卷和发育筛查测验229例结果分析[J].中国儿童保健杂志,2012,20(1):78-79.
[8] 魏梅,卞晓燕,Squires Jane,等.年龄与发育进程问卷中国常模及心理测量学特性研究[J].中华儿科杂志,2015,53(12):78-79.
[9] 帖利军,史晓薇,刘黎明.高危儿系统管理和早期干预模式的研究进展[J].中国妇幼健康研究,2011,22(2):238-240.