目的 评估家庭干预对早产儿神经心理发育的效果,并探索干预效果的影响因素,为早产儿早期干预提供依据。方法 对786名早产儿进行家庭干预并随访,矫正胎龄6月龄时应用Bayley婴幼儿发育量表(BSID-I)对早产儿智力发育和运动发育进行评估,采用巢式病例对照研究,以多因素logistic回归计算干预效果,并根据早产儿的不同特征分层,计算每层中干预作用的大小。结果 家庭干预能降低早产儿智力发育异常的风险(OR=0.31,95%CI:0.11~0.84),分层分析结果显示干预对于男性早产儿、晚期早产儿、低出生体重早产儿、母亲年龄<30岁、父亲或母亲受教育程度为高中以上的早产儿效果显著(P<0.05)。家庭干预能降低低出生体重早产儿运动发育运动发育异常的风险(OR=0.24,95%CI:0.07~0.90)。结论 家庭干预能促进早产儿的智力发育和低出生体重早产儿的运动发育。早产儿的自身因素和家庭因素都能影响干预的效果。
Abstract
Objective To evaluate effects of family intervention on early neurodevelopment of premature infants,explore factors of intervention effect,and provide evidences to early intervention for premature infants. Method sA total of 786 premature infants were followed up,Bayley Scales of Infant Development(BSID-I) was used to evaluate their mental development and motor development at corrected 6 months age.A nested case-control study was carried out by multivariable logistic regression analysis.Premature infants were stratified to analyze intervention effect in each layer. Results Family intervention could reduce the risk of poor mental development of premature infants(OR=0.31,95%CI:0.11~0.84),and stratification analysis showed that intervention effect was significant in boys,late premature infants,low birth weight premature infants and premature infants whose mothers' age were under thirty or parents' education were over high school.Family intervention could reduce the risk of poor motor development in low birth weight premature infants(OR=0.24,95%CI:0.07~0.90). Conclusions Family intervention can increase mental development of premature infants and motor development of low birth weight premature infants.Factors of premature infants and their family can influence intervention effect.
关键词
早产儿 /
神经心理发育 /
家庭干预
Key words
premature infants /
neurodevelopment /
family intervention
{{custom_sec.title}}
{{custom_sec.title}}
{{custom_sec.content}}
参考文献
[1] Blencowe H,Cousens S,Oestergaard MZ,et al.National,regional,and worldwide estimates of preterm birth rates in the year 2010 with time trends since 1990 for selected countries:a systematic analysis and implications[J].Lancet,2012,379:2162-2172.
[2] 中华医学会儿科学分会新生儿学组.中国城市早产儿流行病学初步调查报告[J].中国当代儿科杂志,2005,7(1):25-28.
[3] 李娟.2005年中国城市产科新生儿出生状况调查[J].中国当代儿科杂志,2012,14(1):7-10.
[4] 朱燕.出生早产儿流行病学特征的前瞻性多中心调查[D].上海:复旦大学,2012.
[5] 李松.早产和低出生体重及小于胎龄儿与脑性瘫痪发病的关系[J].中华儿科杂志,2003,41(5):28-31.
[6] 李蓓,冯菁菁.早产儿早期神经运动发育纵向随访[J].中国儿童保健杂志,2013,21(5):470-472,476.
[7] 刘湘云,陈荣华.儿童保健学[M].江苏:江苏科学技术出版社,2011:114.
[8] 余章斌,韩树萍.系统评价早产对儿童智力发育的影响及早期干预作用[J].中国循证儿科杂志,2012,7(2):113-119.
[9] 易受蓉.贝利婴幼儿发育量表手册(中国城市修订版)[M].长沙:湖南医科大学,1992.
[10] 徐海青.早期家庭干预促进围产期高危儿智能发育的研究[J].中国儿童保健杂志,2001,9(2):97-99.
[11] Spittle A,Orton J,Doyle LW,et al.Early developmental intervention programs post hospital discharge to prevent motor and cognitive impairments in preterm infants[J].Cochrane Database Systematic Reviews,2007,3(1):145-206.
[12] 夏荣华,李振华.早期干预对早产儿智能发育影响的研究[J].中国临床医学,2004,11(4):537-538.
[13] 李莎,静进.早期干预促进低出生体重儿神经心理及体格发育的研究[J].中国儿童保健杂志,2008,16(2):206-209.
[14] 方璐.高危儿早期干预效果及其影响因素分析[D].杭州:杭州师范大学,2012.
PDF(503 KB)
