目的 对比丽水市3~6岁城乡学龄前儿童体质现状,分析影响儿童体质的因素。方法 抽取丽水市城乡6所幼儿园共804名学龄前儿童进行问卷和体质调查。结果 除6岁男童外,其他城镇儿童体质总得分均高于同龄乡村儿童(P<0.05),城乡差异主要体现在身高、体重、体质指数(BMI)、立定跳远、10 m折返跑、双脚连续跳;体质总得分与室内身体静态活动平均每天时间、父亲身高、父母亲教育程度存在正相关(P<0.05)。结论 社会、学校和家庭各个层面应该共同努力从营养、建立良好生活方式、加强体育锻炼等多方面全面促进城乡儿童健康发展。
Abstract
Objective To compare the urban and rural preschool children aged 3~6 physical fitness of Lishui city,and to explore the influence factors of children's physical fitness. Method A total of 804 preschool children of Lishui city urban and rural six kindergartens were studied by questionnaire investigation and physical test. Results In addition to the 6-year-old boy,other town total scores were higher than in the same age children constitution village children(P<0.05),the urban and rural differences in height,weight,body mass index (BMI),standing long jump,a reverse layup 10 meters,feet jump; Physical fitness total score and indoor static body constitution activity time,father height,parents' education level had weak positive correlation (P<0.05). Conclusion Society,schools and families should joint efforts from all levels of nutrition,to establish a good lifestyle,exercise more aspects of the comprehensive promote the healthy development of children.
关键词
学龄前儿童 /
体质 /
对比
Key words
preschool children /
physical fitness /
contrast
{{custom_sec.title}}
{{custom_sec.title}}
{{custom_sec.content}}
参考文献
[1] 窦义蓉,曹型厚,曹型远.重庆市 6 岁学生体质健康状况分析[J].中国学校卫生,2012,33(3):356-357.
[2] 张保国,王静,王小迪.2010年淄博市3~6岁儿童体质监测数据分析及生活方式调查[J].中国儿童保健杂志,2014,22(11):1201-1205.
[3] 国家国民体质监测中心.2014年国民体质监测工作手册[M].北京:人民体育出版社,2014:69-74.
[4] 徐建国.苏州市2008年3~6岁城乡学龄儿童体质状况对比分析[J].长春大学学报,2010,20(6):97-99.
[5] 杜亚婷,杨晨,齐东明.北京市昌平区3~6岁集体儿童体质发展现状分析[J].中国儿童保健杂志,2015,23(7):733-735.
[6] 王晓东.胎龄、喂养方式因素与幼儿体质水平的关联性研究[J].体育科学,2007,27(12):47-51.
[7] 李健.生活方式对3~6岁幼儿体质影响的研究[J].中国学校卫生,2008,29(5):458-459.
[8] 李一辰,潘迎,赵娟.北京市3~6岁儿童生活方式对体质影响的研究[J].中国儿童保健杂志,2011,19(6):563-565.
[9] 李一辰,潘迎,孟杰,等.北京市3~6岁儿童体质影响因素分析[J].中国儿童保健杂志,2013,21(11):1192-1194.
基金
浙江省中青年学科带头人培养经费资助(pd2013469)