目的 评价中文版SNAP-Ⅳ评定量表-父母版在学龄前儿童中的适用性。方法 选择门诊诊断为注意缺陷多动障碍(ADHD)的儿童200名以及附近幼儿园的81名正常儿童为研究对象,年龄范围4岁～5岁11个月。请其家长填写SNAP-Ⅳ父母版后,问卷进行内部一致性和验证性因素分析,其中75名家长填写Conners问卷,265名家长填写CBCL量表以检查效标效度。32名家长间隔2周之后再次填写SNAP-Ⅳ以检查重测信度。结果 SNAP-Ⅳ重测信度为0.68~0.84(P<0.001),内部一致性系数为0.84~0.93;SNAP-Ⅳ与Conners问卷及CBCL量表因子相关系数为r=0.38~0.79(P<0.01);验证性因素分析显示,SNAP-Ⅳ 3因子模型结构拟合良好;实证效度在SNAP-Ⅳ各因子评分上,ADHD组显著高于年龄、性别相匹配的正常组(t=-4.22~-9.67,P<0.001)。结论 中文版SNAP-Ⅳ评定量表父母版在学前儿童中具有良好的信度和效度,适用于我国文化背景。
Abstract
Objective To evaluate the reliability and validity of the Chinese version of the Swanson,Nolan,and Pelham,version Ⅳ scale(SNAP-Ⅳ)-parent form for preschooler in China. Method Parents of kindergarten students(4 y 0 m~5 y 11 m,n=81)and parents of non-reference clinical patients with ADHD(4 y 0 m~5 y 11 m,n=200) completed the SNAP-Ⅳ,75 of which completed Conners,265 of which completed Child Bahabior Checklist (CBCL) 32 of them completed SNAP-Ⅳ retest after 2 weeks. Results Retest reliability was 0.68~0.84 and Cronbach α coefficient was 0.84~0.93.Subscales of SNAP-Ⅳ were moderately correlated (r=0.38~0.79,P<0.001)with subscales of Conners and CBCL.Lisrel Confirmatory factor analysis showed that the three factors model of SNAP-Ⅳ was reasonable.Compared with the normal control group,the ADHD group got higher scores in all aspects,which had significant statistically differences (t=-4.22~-9.67,P<0.001). Conclusion The reliability and validity of the Chinese version of SNAP-Ⅳ-parent form are satisfactory among preschooler in China.
关键词
SNAP-Ⅳ评定量表 /
学龄前儿童 /
信度 /
效度
Key words
Swanson Nolan and Pelham-Ⅳ /
preschooler /
reliability /
validity
{{custom_sec.title}}
{{custom_sec.title}}
{{custom_sec.content}}
参考文献
[1] Thapar A,Cooper M.Attention deficit hyperactivity disorder[J].Lancet,2016,387:1240-1250.
[2] Christina MJ,Christoph SH.A meta-analysis and systematic review of the risks associated with childhood attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder on long-term outcome of arrests,convictions,and incarcerations[J].Clinical Psychology Review,2016,48:32-42.
[3] Susan SG,Shang CY,Liu S,et al.Psychometric properties of the Chinese version of the Swanson,Nolan,and Pelham,version Ⅳ scale - parent form[J].International Journal of Methods in Psychiatric Research,2007,34(8):850-861.
[4] 周晋波,郭兰婷,陈颖.中文版注意缺陷多动障碍SNAP-Ⅳ评定量表-父母版的信效度[J].中国心理卫生杂志,2013,27(6):424-428.
[5] Michael SS,Nancy H.The reliability and criterion validity of the diagnostic infant and preschool assessment:A new diagnostic instrument for young children[J].Child Psychiatry & Human Development,2010,41(3):299-312.
[6] 郭茹,毛定安,李介民.3～5岁儿童行为问题调查及中美Conners常模的比较[J].中国当代儿科杂志,2011,13(11):900-903.
[7] 苏林雁,李雪荣.Achenbach儿童行为量表的再标准化及效度检验[J].中国心理卫生杂志,1998,12(2):67-69.
[8] 陈琦,梁万年,孟群.结构方程模型及其应用[M].北京:经济科学出版社,2004.
[9] 张文彤.SPSS统计分析高级教程[M].北京:高等教育出版社,2013.
[10] Yuki I,Keiko I,Yosuke K,et al.Psychometric properties of Japanese version of the Swanson,Nolan,and Pelham,version-Ⅳ Scale-Teacher Form:A study of school children in community samples[J].Brain & Development,2014,36(8):700-706.
[11] Nobuya T,Satomi Y,Sayura Y,et al.Psychometric properties of the Japanese ADHD-RS in preschool children[J].Research in Developmental Disabilities,2016,55:268-278.
[12] Becker SP,Langberg JM,Vaughn AJ,et al.Clinical utility of the Vanderbilt ADHD diagnostic parent rating scale comorbidity screening scales[J].Journal of Developmental & Behavioral Pediatrics,2012,33(3):221-228.
[13] 肖朝华,王庆红,罗甜甜.儿童注意缺陷多动障碍共患病及功能损害研究[J].中国当代儿科杂志,2013,15(9):728-732.
基金
上海市科学技术委员会科研计划项目(14411968600)
PDF(597 KB)
