上海市某社区幼儿居家安全环境评估及干预效果评价

张胜冰,王军,周德定

中国儿童保健杂志 ›› 2016, Vol. 24 ›› Issue (5) : 538-540.

PDF(427 KB)
PDF(427 KB)
中国儿童保健杂志 ›› 2016, Vol. 24 ›› Issue (5) : 538-540. DOI: 10.11852/zgetbjzz2016-24-05-28
经验交流

上海市某社区幼儿居家安全环境评估及干预效果评价

  • 张胜冰1,王军1,周德定2
作者信息 +

Assessment and intervention effect of the environment about children's home security in a community in Shanghai.

  • ZHANG Sheng-bing1,WANG Jun1,ZHOU De-ding2.
Author information +
文章历史 +

摘要

目的 评估幼儿居家环境伤害危险因素及干预效果。方法 采用系统抽样法在儿童保健门诊抽取120名满1周岁的幼儿家庭,通过自拟《儿童家庭安全环境评估表》及全球儿童安全网络推荐的5S家居用品安全检查原则,以医务人员入户访视的方式对幼儿居家环境进行危险因素评估,并指导干预。结果 75项家庭环境危险因素,干预前有53项被检出,检出率为0.92%~78.90%之间;其中危险因素检出率在50%以上的有“房门未使用安全门卡或门挡(78.90%)”、“电话机旁无急救电话卡(64.22%)”、“未使用的电源插座无防护(54.13%)”和“非烹饪时灶上放锅(50.46%)”。“房门未使用安全门卡或门挡”等11项环境指标的危险因素在干预前后检出率变化差异有统计学意义(P<0.01)。对环境指标赋值结果显示,干预前平均评估得分(67.9±4.4)分,干预后平均得分(72.9±2.3)分,两者差异有统计学意义(t=15.542,P<0.001)。干预期间幼儿居家伤害发生率为3.67%。结论 通过医务人员上门实施幼儿居家环境危险因素评估和干预,能有效减少幼儿居家伤害发生。预防幼儿居家伤害要加强居家安全防护用品的使用和厨房、卫生间的安全防范。

Abstract

Objective To assess the injury risk factors of children's home environment and the effect of intervention. Methods A total of 120 one-child families were selected in child health clinic by systematic sampling,their family environment were assessed and invented by medical staff door-to-door referring to Self-designed Children's Home Security Assessment form,and the 5S principle of household goods safety inspection recommended by the Safe Kids Worldwide. Results A total of 53 family environmental risk factors were detected in 75 family environmental risk factors before the intervention.The detection rate ranged from 0.92% to 78.90%.There were the door without security card or door stop(78.90%),the telephone without emergency phone cards(64.22%),unused power socket without protection(54.13%) and pan on the stove without cooking with the detection rate of more than 50%.The differences about the detection rate of the 11 environmental risk factors including the door without security card or door stop before and after the intervention were statistically significant(P<0.01).To assign the environmental index showed that the average assignment scores before the intervention were 67.9±4.4,and 72.9±2.3 after.There was statistically significant difference between the scores(t=15.542,P<0.001).The rate of children injury in home was 3.67% during the intervention.Conclusions The children home injury can be effectively reduced children's home environment risk factors assessment and the intervention by the medical staff implement.Prevention of children's home injury needs to strengthen the use of home security products and the safety precaution in the kitchen and bathroom.

关键词

居家安全 / 环境评估 / 干预 / 幼儿

Key words

home safety / environmental assessment / intervention / children

引用本文

导出引用
张胜冰,王军,周德定. 上海市某社区幼儿居家安全环境评估及干预效果评价[J]. 中国儿童保健杂志. 2016, 24(5): 538-540 https://doi.org/10.11852/zgetbjzz2016-24-05-28
ZHANG Sheng-bing,WANG Jun,ZHOU De-ding.. Assessment and intervention effect of the environment about children's home security in a community in Shanghai.[J]. Chinese Journal of Child Health Care. 2016, 24(5): 538-540 https://doi.org/10.11852/zgetbjzz2016-24-05-28
中图分类号: R179   

参考文献

[1] Peden M,Oyegbite K,Ozanne-Smith J,et al.World report on child injury prevention[N].2008.
[2] 刘晓俊.我国儿童伤害流行及研究现状[J].中国学校卫生杂志,2010,31(4):510-511.
[3] Pearce A,Li L,Abbas J,et al.Does the home environment influence inequalities in unintentional injury in early childhood? Findings from the UK Millennium Cohort Study[J].J Epidemiol Community Health,2012,66(2):181-188.
[4] 黄兆胜.儿童伤害监测结果分析[J].中国妇幼保健,2010,25(22):3136-3137.
[5] 张胜冰,周卫国,潘建芳,等.上海市花木社区幼儿居家安全家长认知调查[J].中国儿童保健杂志,2012,20(10):953-955.
[6] 武杰,赵佩丽,刘晓晶,等.北京市某社区0~6岁儿童伤害流行病学调查分析[J].临床荟萃,2012,27(2):160-162.
[7] 陈虹,顾品芳.健康教育干预措施在预防居家儿童伤害中的作用[J].职业与健康,2013,29(14):1718-1721.
[8] 邱贤云,俞继芳,郑琼,等.温州幼儿居家意外伤害的家庭环境因素研究[J].中国妇幼保健,2014,29(7):1039-1042.
[9] 黄丽,关颖,严卫军.上海市松江区0~14岁儿童伤害的特征[J].职业与健康,2011,27(1):56-57.

基金

浦东新区卫生系统优秀社区适宜人才培养计划项目资助(PWRs2015-15)

PDF(427 KB)

Accesses

Citation

Detail

段落导航
相关文章

/