目的 比较两组不同正压通气方式在早产儿呼吸窘迫综合征(neonatal respiratory distress syndrome,RDS)初始治疗中的应用。方法 2012年1月-2014年12月在本院新生儿科住院的符合入选标准的早产儿80例,按照随机数字表随机分为两组,分别给予经鼻持续气道正压通气(nasal continuous positive airway pressure,NCPAP)40例,双相经鼻持续气道正压通气(bi-level positive airway pressure,SiPAP)40例。比较两组正压通气治疗成功率,并发症率。结果 1)需有创呼吸支持SiPAP组(26%)明显低于NCPAP组(52%),治疗成功率SiPAP组高于NCPAP组(P＜0.05);2)两组并发症发病率差异无统计学意义(P＞0.05)。结论 SiPAP治疗RDS较NCPAP疗效好,且未增加不良反应发生率。
Abstract
Objective To compare the advantages and disadvantages of two modes as a primary mode of ventilation in premature infants with neonatal respiratory distress syndrome (RDS). Methods From January 2012 to December 2014,80 preterm infants with RDS who received in our hospital were randomly divided into two groups based on the primary mode of ventilation:nasal continuous positive airway pressure(NCPAP,n=40),bi-level positive airway pressure(SiPAP,n=40).The success rate of treatment and the incidence of different complications were compared. Results 1)Significantly,more infants in the SiPAP group remained extubated compared with those in the NCPAP group,whereas the success rate in SiPAP group was higher in NCPAP group(52% vs 26%,P<0.05).2)No significant difference in the complication was found between two groups(P>0.05). Conclusion The effect of nasal SiPAP for preterm infants with RDS appears to have greater advantage than that of NCPAP obviously,and without increasing the incidence of adverse events.
关键词
经鼻持续气道正压通气 /
双相经鼻持续气道正压通气 /
早产 /
呼吸窘迫综合征 /
新生儿
Key words
nasal continuous positive airway pressure /
bi-level positive airway pressure /
premature /
respiratory distress syndrome /
newborn
{{custom_sec.title}}
{{custom_sec.title}}
{{custom_sec.content}}
参考文献
[1] Sweet DG,Carnielli V,Greisen G,et al.European consensus guidelines on the management of neonatal respiratory distress syndrome in preterm infants- 2010 update[J].Neonatology,2011,49(1):27-33.
[2] 植荣昌,李寅环,黄春萍,无创正压通气在急性肺损伤/急性呼吸窘迫综合征中的随机对照研究[J].中国呼吸与危重症杂志,2012,11(6):522-527.
[3] 邵肖梅,叶鸿帽,丘小汕.实用新生儿学[M].4版.北京:人民卫生出版社,2011:395-398.
[4] Bancalari E,Claure N.Principles of respiratory monitoring and therapy[M]//Gleason CA,Davaskar SU.Avrey's Diseases of the Newborn,9th ed.Philadelphia:Elsevier Saunders,2012:612-632.
[5] DiBlasi RM.Neonatal noninvasive ventilation techniques :do we really need to intubate?[J].Respir Care,2011,56:1273-1294.
[6] 高翔羽 黑明燕 双水平气道正压通气在早产儿呼吸窘迫综合征中的应用 中华儿科杂志,2013,51(10):756-757.
[7] Victor S.EXTUBATE:a randomised controlled trial of nasal biphasic positive airway pressure vs nasal continuous positive airway pressure following estuation in infants less than 30 weeks' gestation:study protocol for a randomised controlled trial[J].Trials,2011,12:257-264.
PDF(377 KB)
