BSID-Ⅲ认知量表在中国应用初探

叶侃,罗晓明,金华,雷洁,古桂雄

中国儿童保健杂志 ›› 2015, Vol. 23 ›› Issue (10) : 1041-1043.

PDF(450 KB)
PDF(450 KB)
中国儿童保健杂志 ›› 2015, Vol. 23 ›› Issue (10) : 1041-1043. DOI: 10.11852/zgetbjzz2015-23-10-10
科研论著

BSID-Ⅲ认知量表在中国应用初探

  • 叶侃1,罗晓明2,金华3,雷洁3,古桂雄3
作者信息 +

Initiative study on the applicability of BSID-Ⅲ Cognitive Scale in China.

  • YE Kan1,LUO Xiao-ming2,JIN Hua3,LEI Jie3,GU Gui-xiong3.
Author information +
文章历史 +

摘要

目的 检验贝莉婴幼儿发育量表Ⅲ(The Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development,BSID-Ⅲ)认知量表的信度和效度,探讨其在我国引进和使用的可行性。方法 翻译、回译BSID-Ⅲ,在无锡、太原、郴州三个研究点,共1 440名16 d~42个月儿童进行BSID-Ⅲ认知量表测试。结果 重测信度为0.946;内部信度分析, Cronbach'α系数为0.987。校标效度Pearson 相关系数为0.93。结论 BSID-Ⅲ认知量表有较好的信度和效度,临床上可以使用该量表评定儿童的认知水平,在我国范围内引进和应用是可行和必要的。

Abstract

Objective To explore the applicability of BSID-Ⅲ Cognitive Scale in China to test the reliability and validity of BSID-Ⅲ. Methods BSID-Ⅲ were translated into Chinese,and back translated into English.1 440 infants were randomly selected in Wuxi,Taiyuan and Chenzhou,aged from 16 days to 42 months.Cognitive tests were performed in all infants by BSID-Ⅲ. Results Test-retest reliability was 0.946.The internal consistent reliability,Cronbach coefficient was 0.987.Spearman coefficients of validity was 0.93. Conclusion BSID-Ⅲ Cognitive Scale shows good reliability and validity.It is feasible to assess the cognitive development of infants and toddlers in China.It is practicable and necessary to use it.

关键词

贝莉婴幼儿发育量表-Ⅲ / 认知发育 / 信度 / 效度
中图分类号:R179 文献标识码:A 文章编号:1008-6579(2015)10-1041-03 doi:10.11852/zgetbjzz2015-23-10-10

Key words

Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development-Ⅲ / cognitive development / reliability / validity

引用本文

导出引用
叶侃,罗晓明,金华,雷洁,古桂雄. BSID-Ⅲ认知量表在中国应用初探[J]. 中国儿童保健杂志. 2015, 23(10): 1041-1043 https://doi.org/10.11852/zgetbjzz2015-23-10-10
YE Kan,LUO Xiao-ming,JIN Hua,LEI Jie,GU Gui-xiong.. Initiative study on the applicability of BSID-Ⅲ Cognitive Scale in China.[J]. Chinese Journal of Child Health Care. 2015, 23(10): 1041-1043 https://doi.org/10.11852/zgetbjzz2015-23-10-10
中图分类号: R179   

参考文献

[1] Weiss LG.Bayley-Ⅲ Clinical Use and Interpretation[M].US:American Academic Press,2010.
[2] Bayley N.Bayley scales of infant and toddler development [M].Third edition.San Antonio TX:Harcourt Assessment,Inc,2005.
[3] Nancy B.Bayley-Ⅲ scales of infant and toddler development[M].US:American Academic Press,2013.
[4] Bos AF.Bayley-II or Bayley-Ⅲ:What do the scores tell us [J].Developmental Medicine and Child Neurology,2013,55(11):978-979.
[5] Lowe JR,Erickson SJ,Schrader R,et al.Comparison of the Bayley II mental developmental index and the Bayley Ⅲ cognitive scale:are we measuring the same thing?[J].Aacta Paediatrica,2012,101(2):e55-58.
[6] Anderson PJ,De Luca CR,Hutchinson E,et al.Underestimation of developmental delay by the new Bayley-Ⅲ scale[J].Archives of Pediatrics & Adolescent Medicine,2010,164(4):352-356.
[7] Morse SB,Zheng H,Tang Y,et al.Early school-age outcomes of late preterm infants[J].Pediatrics,2009,123(4):622-629.
[8] Chyi LJ,Lee HC,Hintz SR,et al.School outcomes of late preterm infants:special needs and challenges for infants born at 32 to 36 weeks gestation[J].Pediatrics,2008,153(1):25-31.
[9] Milne S,McDonald J,Comino EJ,et al.The use of the BSID scales of infant and toddler development Ⅲ with clinical populations:A preliminary exploration[J].Physical Occupational Therapy Pediatrics,2012,32 (1):24-33.

基金

江苏省卫生计生委2014-2015年度预防医学科研课题(Y2015069);苏州市社会发展科技计划(SS201329)

PDF(450 KB)

Accesses

Citation

Detail

段落导航
相关文章

/