城市流动儿童和非流动儿童统合型房树人测试结果比较

张荣娟

中国儿童保健杂志 ›› 2015, Vol. 23 ›› Issue (3) : 245-246.

PDF(295 KB)
PDF(295 KB)
中国儿童保健杂志 ›› 2015, Vol. 23 ›› Issue (3) : 245-246. DOI: 10.11852/zgetbjzz2015-23-03-07
科研论著

城市流动儿童和非流动儿童统合型房树人测试结果比较

  • 张荣娟
作者信息 +

Comparison of Synthetic House-Tree-Person Test between migrant children and resident children

  • ZHANG Rong-juan
Author information +
文章历史 +

摘要

目的 对比城市流动儿童与非流动儿童在房树人投射绘画上表现的差异。方法 采用统合型房树人绘画测验方法对78例流动儿童和87名非流动儿童进行测试,并根据一定的编码对绘画作品进行评定,对两组被试在各单一条目及各维度上的得分进行比较。结果 两组儿童在攻击(t=3.39)、自卑退缩(t=6.23)、抑郁(t=6.86)和焦虑(t=5.50)各维度差异均有统计学意义(P均<0.01),且各心理维度之间相关显著(r=0.28~0.59,P<0.05)。结论 流动儿童在攻击、自卑退缩、抑郁和焦虑等心理健康指标上得分高于非流动儿童,需加强有效的干预。

Abstract

Objective To compare the performance on the projective drawing of House-Tree-Person Tests between migrant children and resident children. Methods Synthetic House-Tree-Person Test was adopted to 78 migrant children and 87 resident children,and drawing were rated according to some encoding criteria,then scores on each item and dimension were compared between two groups. Results There were great difference in aggression (t=3.39),inferiority and withdrawal (t=6.23),depression (t=6.86) and anxiety (t=5.50) between the two groups (P all<0.01).The relationships between all the psychological dimensions were significant (r=0.28~0.59,P<0.05). Conclusion Migrant children scored higher than resident children on some mental health indicators like aggression,inferiority and withdrawal,depression and anxiety,and some efficient interference should be considered.

关键词

统合型房树人 / 流动儿童 / 心理健康

Key words

Synthetic House-Tree-Person / migrant children / mental health

引用本文

导出引用
张荣娟. 城市流动儿童和非流动儿童统合型房树人测试结果比较[J]. 中国儿童保健杂志. 2015, 23(3): 245-246 https://doi.org/10.11852/zgetbjzz2015-23-03-07
ZHANG Rong-juan. Comparison of Synthetic House-Tree-Person Test between migrant children and resident children[J]. Chinese Journal of Child Health Care. 2015, 23(3): 245-246 https://doi.org/10.11852/zgetbjzz2015-23-03-07
中图分类号: R749.94   

参考文献

[1] 严虎,陈晋东.农村留守儿童与非留守儿童房树人测验结果比较[J].中国临床心理学杂志,2013,21(3):417-419.
[2] Buck JN.The House-Tree-Person technique revised manual[M].VC.W.P.Services,1977.
[3] 蔺秀云,方晓义,刘杨,等.流动儿童歧视知觉与心理健康水平的关系及其心理机制[J].心理学报,2009,41(10):967-979.
[4] 张同延,张函诗.揭开你人格的秘密:房、树、人绘图心理测验[M].北京:中国文联出版公司,2007:25-297.
[5] 童辉杰.投射技术-对适合中国人文化的心理测评技术的探索[M].哈尔滨:黑龙江人民出版社,2004:19-75.
[6] 陈侃.绘画心理测验与心理分析[M].广州:广东高教出版社,2008:69-95.
[7] 李洪伟,吴迪.心理画:绘画心理分析图典[M].长沙:湖南人民出版社,2010:73-141.
[8] 王萍萍,许燕,王其峰.汶川地震灾区与非灾区儿童动态房树人测验结果比较[J].中国临床心理学杂志,2010,18(6):720-722.
[9] 陈侃.焦虑症状的绘画评定研究[J].心理科学,2011,34(6):1512-1515.
[10] 张迪,白春玉,牟均,等.流动儿童心理健康状况与自尊关系的研究[J].中国儿童保健杂志,2013,21(3):300-302.
[11] 李晓巍,邹泓,金灿灿,等.流动儿童的问题行为与人格、家庭功能的关系[J].心理发展与教育,2008,24(2):54-59.
[12] 袁晓娇,方晓义,刘 杨,等.流动儿童压力应对方式与抑郁感、社交焦虑的关系:一项追踪研究[J].心理发展与教育,2012,28(3):283-291.

基金

2014年河南省哲学社科规划课题(2014CJY037)

PDF(295 KB)

Accesses

Citation

Detail

段落导航
相关文章

/